Brojos, why didn't you interview the Goucher's/Magness?

Rest assured they will get to talk when Sleazy answers. We're all waiting for his lies er.. explanations.

A Mallard wrote:

Seeing as how they were all at the meet on Friday, would have been interesting to have you guys put them on the spot instead of just the NOP Crew.

"Put them on the spot" for what exactly?

A Mallard wrote:

Seeing as how they were all at the meet on Friday, would have been interesting to have you guys put them on the spot instead of just the NOP Crew.

But they WANT Galen and Alberto to be guilty. No sense doing thorough journalism when you're decidedly biased.

See if they're telling the truth/if their stories add up/find out what's motivating them? There are plenty of reasons to put them on the spot, but only an unbiased reporter would question the accusers.

farandbaranced wrote:

See if they're telling the truth/if their stories add up/find out what's motivating them? There are plenty of reasons to put them on the spot, but only an unbiased reporter would question the accusers.

That has been done already. Maybe they wanted to ask the people who haven't been interviewed thoroughly on the matter instead? Biased to get both sides perhaps?

lorper wrote:

A Mallard wrote:

Seeing as how they were all at the meet on Friday, would have been interesting to have you guys put them on the spot instead of just the NOP Crew.

"Put them on the spot" for what exactly?

Agreed. They've already come forward while Alberto has hid behind words written for him by his attorneys.

No I call B S on this .

If the others ( magness and gouchers ) were there and available for interviews , then LRC should have interviewed them as intensely and pointedly as the rowbury or levens or Cain .

The fact they didn't shows me that they are irresponsible one sided and sensationalists.

Remember how they pimped Henry Rono a few years ago, all the time knowing that he had social issues and it wouldn't well ?

They haven't done any investigation of their own, just surfing the wave of accusations ....

You can check my IP address and it isn't in Oregon.

Sad really, but that's the Brojos .

Egun wrote:

No I call B S on this .

If the others ( magness and gouchers ) were there and available for interviews , then LRC should have interviewed them as intensely and pointedly as the rowbury or levens or Cain .

The fact they didn't shows me that they are irresponsible one sided and sensationalists.

Remember how they pimped Henry Rono a few years ago, all the time knowing that he had social issues and it wouldn't well ?

They haven't done any investigation of their own, just surfing the wave of accusations ....

You can check my IP address and it isn't in Oregon.

Sad really, but that's the Brojos .

Look above. They have already been interviewed thoroughly. Brojos WERE getting the other side of the story, like people have been asking for.

lorper wrote:

A Mallard wrote:

Seeing as how they were all at the meet on Friday, would have been interesting to have you guys put them on the spot instead of just the NOP Crew.

"Put them on the spot" for what exactly?

For being arseholes.

Silly question wrote:

lorper wrote:

"Put them on the spot" for what exactly?

For being arseholes.

They don't seem like arseholes to me, and that's hardly something that is easy to put someone on the spot for. People have struggled ever holding Salazar accountable for that.

No shortspan , LRC has not interviewed these people.

LRC is not doing full journalistic coverage, they have picked a side and are looking for a bump on MUA's to show their advertisers why they can charge more sheckles.....

I challenge the Brojos to interview all of the people.

They won't, that's not who they are.

Rather quote (perhaps unstable) john cook ....

Egun wrote:

No shortspan , LRC has not interviewed these people.

LRC is not doing full journalistic coverage, they have picked a side and are looking for a bump on MUA's to show their advertisers why they can charge more sheckles.....

I challenge the Brojos to interview all of the people.

They won't, that's not who they are.

Rather quote (perhaps unstable) john cook ....

I didn't say that LRC had interviewed them, but that they have in fact been thoroughly interviewed. So it makes sense to not redouble efforts when there are those out there who have not discussed the matter/s.

You people are just idiots in the extreme.

For one thing, just how many "employees" do you think Letsrun.com has? They're not CNN or even a local TV station, for Christ's sake.

For another, even if LRC *did* have a half-dozen people with mikes and cameras to send to Portland, and knew that Magness would be there in addition to the Gouchers, why are you so certain that those people would be willing to speak on camera again? And maybe I missed something, but didn't those people just appear on camera, speaking about this very issue?

You are all relentlessly, virulently stupid human beings. If Letsun HAD tracked down the Gouchers and Magness and left Rowbury alone. the same dickheads would have accused them of going after biased sources whose ideas are already out there instead of trying to get a fresh voice (Rowbury) in the mix.

Tell you what, if you want to to know of Kara and Adam and Steve M. have something to say that they haven't already contributed, and you have such a firm grasp on what it takes to be a real journalist, set up interviews with them yourselves instead of pissing and crying all over this forum. Losers.

Really?

Redoubling efforts?

Wow, if you don't see this as one sided journalism , then I'm not sure what you see.

The Brojos are great at pointed questions to 18 year olds, when a feisty rowbury looks straight through them they cower....

They are looking for an increase in monthly average users.

That's it.

Period .

Egun (actually psycho A Duck the sockpuppets), you epitomize the idiots who support NOP.

The whistleblowers have come out of the dark and provided hours of interviews for Epstein and the bbc reporters. Innocent NOPers and Alberto's violent temper have gone into hiding.

[quote]Egun wrote:

The Brojos are great at pointed questions to 18 year olds, when a feisty rowbury looks straight through them they cower....

/quote]

Which one of the Brojos did the Rowbury interview? I didn't know either of them had a British accent, and they both claimed to be in New York this weekend anyway.

No, I am not a Salazar supporter at all .

In fact my many interactions over the decades with him have been pretty terse, dating back to the 70 's at the Loucks meet in white plains .....

I am challenging the Brojos to do their own full diligence on this , not hooking their wagon to others work .

To date they have not .

Again they are pouring gasoline on a match to benefit from the user numbers to the LRC website.

If they really want answers , really do the work .

DROOLING LIKE YOU wrote:

[quote]Egun wrote:

The Brojos are great at pointed questions to 18 year olds, when a feisty rowbury looks straight through them they cower....

/quote]

Which one of the Brojos did the Rowbury interview? I didn't know either of them had a British accent, and they both claimed to be in New York this weekend anyway.

It might not have been one of the Johnsons, but someone was there doing interviews.

In fact, they had time to interview Chris Derrick and ask for HIS thoughts on the NOP.

My question again: Why are the Brojos asking people completely unrelated to the allegations (Chris Derrick/Matt Tegenkamp/Ben True) about their thoughts, but NOT the Gouchers and Magness if they were readily available at the meet?

There's still questions to be asked that Epstein and BBC didn't cover. For example; Kara spent 7 years working with Salazar, saw him "as a father", won a WC Medal with his coaching, and then bailed because he offered her Cytomel, even though she already had thyroid issues?

A Mallard wrote:

My question again: Why are the Brojos asking people completely unrelated to the allegations (Chris Derrick/Matt Tegenkamp/Ben True) about their thoughts, but NOT the Gouchers and Magness if they were readily available at the meet?

Might as well repeat myself.

What makes you so sure that Magness and the Gouchers were available for interviews just because they were at the meet?

And what make you certain that LRC had the resources on-site to conduct all of these "missing" interviews?

(Mostly, though, I was responding to the idiotic post by "Egun," who claimed that Rowbury stared the BroJos down or whatnot when the BroJos were 3,000 freaking miles away.)