Pit Bull Terrier pulls 5000 lbs

what in the butt your what wrote:

What the What wrote:

You can't possibly be that stupid. Seriously, there is no way.

Can you ask why I brought up mass in the first place???

Pretty sure this whole thing started with someone being impressed with a dog pulling a 5,000 lb sled. What I correctly pointed out was that there is no way to know whether or not this is impressive without knowing something about the friction involved. I arbitrarily picked a billion pounds as something "pullable".

Seriously, do you need someone to re-read the entire thread for you?

Perhaps you have this itch to point out that weight and mass are not one and the same, making you very clever, no?

Someone chose the Empire State Building as a reference point. I chose the human body on a bike - resized to weigh a billion pounds.

Honestly, you could not pick up on all of this? If you actually have trouble following this then I seriously doubt that you even have a high school diploma let alone an advanced degree from Berkeley.

Anyway, it's been fun.

Your trolling caught me. Or your stupidity. Either way I give you credit.

That's right you got caught. You got caught lying about having a PhD in math from UC Berkeley.

He put up a picture of his degree from Berkeley in engineering and you stopped posting cold.

Have a pic of your PhD in math from Berkeley yet? Did it take you 3 hours to respond? Or were you making it up? Of course you were.

The things you wrote were not at the level of a PhD. So no, you don't have a PhD in math from Berkeley.

What the What . . . you is a BIATCH!!!!

What the What just got Shut The F*ck Up!

M.S. engineer wrote:

A little recap of What the What and his mathematical brilliance:

What the What wrote:

No offense but that is dumber than hell.

/OK, let's do the math, shall we?

Air resistance is proportional to mass ^ (2/3). Which just goes to show that you are a moron…

But thank you for playing anyway….

/Here is perhaps the stupidest thing ever posted on LRC: . . .

Perhaps I should give you credit for being a reasonably good troll. Certainly you are either monumentally stupid or a reasonably good troll.

/OK, you cannot possibly be that stupid…

Mass is somehow related to volume.

Volume is somehow related to surface area.

Surface area is somehow related to cross sectional area.

Cross sectional area is somehow related to air resistance.

Troll away. Or stupid away. Whichever applies.

/OK, so you are taking stupid to a whole new level here.

"The cross sectional area of an object can be equal for a 2 pound book as a 50 pound slab of steel the same size. They could have the same drag if they were the same size regardless of mass."

But obviously you are trolling as we all know that two objects of the same material clearly will have the same volume regardless of their mass.

Well done

7+/10

PhD - Mathematics - UC Berkeley

/You can't possibly be that stupid. Seriously, there is no way.

…

Seriously, do you need someone to re-read the entire thread for you?

…

Honestly, you could not pick up on all of this? If you actually have trouble following this then I seriously doubt that you even have a high school diploma let alone an advanced degree from Berkeley.

Anyway, it's been fun.

Your trolling caught me. Or your stupidity. Either way I give you credit.

/OK, that settles it.

You really ARE that stupid. Holy shit!

/Honest question - and not I am not kidding - are you brain damaged or something?

ALL of the students from EVERY course I have taught at Berkeley would have ZERO trouble with any of this. The fact that it is above your head (or you are just too stubborn to admit to your having missed the obvious) leads me to believe that you are not bright enough to get into UC as a freshman undergrad.

Still no defense using actual equations huh? You just keep saying "you're so stupid!" I wouldn't expect any more from you.

You don't think I went to Berkeley for my BS and MS? PROOF!

http://i57.tinypic.com/258uj5f.jpg

Let's see your "PhD" from Berkeley

SUCK IT

What the What wrote:

M.S. engineer wrote:

I am a mechanical engineer. The poster above provides the correct formula for drag force as low Navier Stokes conditions

You said air resistance is proportional to mass by 2/3 power? Where is this from?

I'd seriously like to know where such a simplistic calculation came from. It would make our extremely expensive and complex fluid mechanics software suite obsolete.

The cross sectional area of an object can be equal for a 2 pound book as a 50 pound slab of steel the same size. They could have the same drag if they were the same size regardless of mass.

The drag of a horizontal airfoil is much lower than if the airfoil was vertical despite weighing the same. That is not only due to the change in cross sectional area incident to the wind, but also the drastic change in Cd. Every wonder why wings are shaped the way they are?

The list goes on...

May I ask what type of work are you in and what is your highest level of education?

OK, so you are taking stupid to a whole new level here.

"The cross sectional area of an object can be equal for a 2 pound book as a 50 pound slab of steel the same size. They could have the same drag if they were the same size regardless of mass."

But obviously you are trolling as we all know that two objects of the same material clearly will have the same volume regardless of their mass.

Well done

7+/10

PhD - Mathematics - UC Berkeley