Kid who wants to know wrote:
Regarding the still unrevealed marathoner from 30-35 years ago - fair enough - I can respect your desire not to out the runner, but on the other hand, it does seem like this type of attitude that contributes to the problem. Not that revealing a 2:12 guy from the mid 80s would solve anything I suppose.
And some of us youngsters are enough of a student of the sport to know how good that era was. The number of American guys who broke 2:20 at Boston and NYC that year is mind boggling. I have looked at the results and wondered--was it drugs, or are 75% of those dudes just doing other endurance sports today?
Me not revealing something someone told me when neither of us could have ever imagined something like an internet forum where people lap this up (25 years after the admission) is not contributing to the problem.
What would it solve? You would just shame him and drop his name every chance you ever got. I choose not to.
We don't have any shortage of track athletes to shame if you look up the Dubin Inquiry, East German track and field research files uncovered by Werner Franke at the Stasi headquarters, the BALCO scandal, the current Russian scandal, the current rash of Kenyan positives, the USA sprinter positives ...
There is no shortage of examples that the sport is not drug-free.