Is it any wonder wrote:
You are certain the marker will correct downward 19% this October but think it foolish to get out of the market? WTF?
he didn't say either of those things. lurn 2 reed.
Is it any wonder wrote:
You are certain the marker will correct downward 19% this October but think it foolish to get out of the market? WTF?
he didn't say either of those things. lurn 2 reed.
Learn to spell correctly. Thank you. Have a nice day sir.
lurn 2 reed wrote:
he didn't say either of those things. lurn 2 reed.
I already know how...c-o-r-r-e-c-t-l-y
You do not seem like you do based off of your previous post. Google can aid in helping you, but you've got to put some time in to see real improvement. Best of luck friend.
lurn 2 reed wrote:
I already know how...c-o-r-r-e-c-t-l-y
Like Clintons crash in his last year, Total destruction everyone likes to deny and hide. Was good for us as we planned the Naz to dive as it was 4400 at the time, we froze everything when Clinton had 10 months left..everone lost at least 65 percent, Obamay's last year..watch.
Big tooth investor wrote:
In every midterm election year since 1962 the market has corrected an average of 19%. Following each correction the market has gained an average of 32% in the next 12 months. There's your history lesson.
As for why would anyone remain in the market, I'd say it's foolish to try to time things like this. Most who do try will get burned.
"In every..." does not go very well with "...has corrected an average..."
Also, citing an average does not go very well with "will almost certainly be a correction before year's end in the area of 19%".
Mrr82 wrote:
, taxes taken in go up, more money is going around
Does not compute.
Two days before the day after tomorrow?
What the What wrote:
Big tooth investor wrote:In every midterm election year since 1962 the market has corrected an average of 19%. Following each correction the market has gained an average of 32% in the next 12 months. There's your history lesson.
As for why would anyone remain in the market, I'd say it's foolish to try to time things like this. Most who do try will get burned.
"In every..." does not go very well with "...has corrected an average..."
Also, citing an average does not go very well with "will almost certainly be a correction before year\'s end in the area of 19%".
Your first sentence is nonsense. The poster wrote perfectly good, and understandable, English.
I see nothing in what you quoted to substantiate your second sentence.
This is the important stuff!
In every midterm election year since 1962 the market has corrected by an average of 19%. Following each correction the market has gained an average of 32% in the following 12 months.
Grammarian wrote:
What the What wrote:"In every..." does not go very well with "...has corrected an average..."
Also, citing an average does not go very well with "will almost certainly be a correction before year's end in the area of 19%".
Your first sentence is nonsense. The poster wrote perfectly good, and understandable, English.
I see nothing in what you quoted to substantiate your second sentence.
INCORRECT!
1) Unless you are going to claim that the standard deviation for these was zero then no, it is simply NOT true that "In every midterm election year since 1962 the market has corrected an average of 19%."
It may be true that there have been market corrections averaging 19%. However it is certainly NOT true that every midterm election year...has corrected an average of 19%.
2) Nothing to substantiate? That is really funny. So, if the average height of an adult male in the US is 5' 9" then it is almost certainly true that Dwight Howard is 5' 9"?
Please try to think prior to posting.
You are an idiot. Try doing some research before spouting off. That way you might not put your foot in your mouth.
A few basics to note: 1) No one knows crap about the future. What you have is a bunch of people trying to understand history and some even get doctorate degrees to impress us. 2) The market ceased to move on the so called fundamentals, it is now a huge Ponzi Scheme, based on speculation. 3) The market is rigged, meaning not everyone has an equal chance to make or lose money. 3) Money has to be parked somewhere and the inventory will continually grow , but perceived value will grow and wane also on speculation. So having this in mind your bet is as good as anyone's for a correction and resurgence. If you have the stomach to play its the age old recommendation of hedging your bets, don't get greedy and play for the long haul.
As soon as Obama is reelected for a 2nd term! The whole country will crash down around us! I saw it discussed on TV, I know it will happen! Buy gold! Head for the hills! Stockpile guns!!
How's your lunch? wrote:
You are an idiot. Try doing some research before spouting off. That way you might not put your foot in your mouth.
Excellent logical reasoning. Well-supported by data and examples.
Well done, sir. Well done indeed!
As others have suggested mid-to late 2016. Maaaaybe, the market will hold into early 2017, but not longer than that.
And I also agree with the poster that the eventual fall will not be based on the underlying economics, but rather a shift in investor attitude (which is only partially driven by economic reality).
Big tooth investor wrote:
Is it any wonder wrote:Can you give us the details as to why you think history "teaches" us "..there will almost certainly be a correction before year's end in the area of 19%"? And that "History also tells us the market will then bounce back in excess of 30%"?
And why anyone would remain in the market for an almost certain correction of 19%?
In every midterm election year since 1962 the market has corrected an average of 19%. Following each correction the market has gained an average of 32% in the next 12 months. There's your history lesson.
As for why would anyone remain in the market, I'd say it's foolish to try to time things like this. Most who do try will get burned.
^this x 100.
Pointing Out the Obvious wrote:
Big tooth investor wrote:In every midterm election year since 1962 the market has corrected an average of 19%. Following each correction the market has gained an average of 32% in the next 12 months. There's your history lesson.
As for why would anyone remain in the market, I'd say it's foolish to try to time things like this. Most who do try will get burned.
^this x 100.
Dumb as always, huh POTO?
I recently read the same thing about mid-term election years. So not dumb, WtW.
WtW, I believe there is a thread about advice active on the board. If you have not read it, I believe one piece of advice is "keep quiet and let people think you are an azzhole, don't' open your mouth and prove it".