that's true but wrote:
Who has he even beaten in an important race? Lagat at trials, not so important, second basically as good as first; lagat's beaten him about 20x...medaled against a weak field in the olympics, with two bekeles on the downsides of their careers, and a bunch of Americans at us championships. i like rupp and watching the record attempts and everything, but this is not surprising in the last. I would have been SHOCKED if he had beaten an in-shape Willis.
Who has he beaten in an important race? Seriously? Rupp has beaten a lot of top runners in big races such as diamond league and at they olympics and world championships. He has beaten a lot of sub 12:55 and 26:50 guys. Now I'm sure you'll have laundry list of excuses of why those guys couldn't beat Rupp on those days, and conveniently forget that is what racing is.
He is not the man of distance running in the world, he's just trying to keep climbing to the top. Seems to me he has done a damn fine job of it. People have said things like Rupp will:
Never win an NCAA title - 7
Never win a "race that matters" - how many US championships?
Never win an olympic medal - silver
Never break 4:00 in the mile - 3:50
Never break 13:00 for 5000 - 12:58
Never break 27:00 for 10000 - 26:48
etc. etc.
So he goes on to do all of those things and then some, and then keep improving and he somehow gets torn apart because he's not the greatest runner in every event in history.
Wake me up when the only guys we can talk about having a better range from 1500 - half marathon aren't guys like
Bekele 1
Geb
Tergat
Komen
Farah