Lee Harvey Oswald: Innocent or Guilty?

Keepin it Real wrote:

Recent evidence suggests he is indeed innocent.

Take a look at a HIGH RESOLUTION video of the Zapruder film now available on YouTube. If you look closely you will notice that it is PLAIN AS DAY that JACKIE KENNDY pulls out a gun and shoots JFK in the head! Nothing else happens! All that junk about Oswald and the grasy knoll etc. are just made up diversions. So the JFK riddle boils down to ONE question and ONE answer. The question: how does a rich catholic woman get a divorce from her rich catholic husband? The answer: A bullet to the head! The simplist explanation that fits the facts is the best one.

Edumacation wrote:

Oswald shot at Kennedy, but did not hit him.

The kill shot came from behind Kennedy, and was fired by one of his secret service agents. That agent shot wildly toward Oswald's position from a rapidly accelerating and moving car. He ended up hitting Kennedy in the back of the head by mistake.

All of this can easily be proven but never will be.

Well then you should prove it...

Keepin it Real wrote:

Recent evidence suggests he is indeed innocent.

What evidence? Been listening to Alex Jones again?

dontflushwhileyousit wrote:

I recently watched some news special that took the 8mm film and converted it to computer animation to prove that the shot came from the book depository. It seemed reasonable enough.

The issue isn't really whether or not Oswald shot Kennedy. The issue is who made Oswald kill Kennedy.

There is a theory that a 4th shot was fired, also from the Book Depositry, from another window. Or that Oswald fired once or twice, but the kill shot was from another sniper.

Wasn't Oswald just an average shot when he was a soldier?

Jack Ruby was just too convient.

Winklevoss Twin 1 punks brojos wrote:

dontflushwhileyousit wrote:

I recently watched some news special that took the 8mm film and converted it to computer animation to prove that the shot came from the book depository. It seemed reasonable enough.

The issue isn't really whether or not Oswald shot Kennedy. The issue is who made Oswald kill Kennedy.

There is a theory that a 4th shot was fired, also from the Book Depositry, from another window. Or that Oswald fired once or twice, but the kill shot was from another sniper.

Wasn't Oswald just an average shot when he was a soldier?

Jack Ruby was just too convient.

what does convient mean?

asfsdafasdfs wrote:

Winklevoss Twin 1 punks brojos wrote:

There is a theory that a 4th shot was fired, also from the Book Depositry, from another window. Or that Oswald fired once or twice, but the kill shot was from another sniper.

Wasn't Oswald just an average shot when he was a soldier?

Jack Ruby was just too convient.

what does convient mean?

Damn right Jack Ruby was convenient. Ruby didn't kill Oswald; he silenced him. For this reason I am firmly convinced certain persons in Dallas PD were part of a conspiracy. Maybe not the conspiracy to kill Kennedy, but clearly the conspiracy to silence Oswald.

Now, call me delusional....but.........

Jack Ruby was just too convient.[/quote]

No doubt that someone/people didn't want this to go to trial - not that Oswald didn't kill JFK, but that he didn't act alone, as in it wasn't his idea alone. I think that is patently obvious, as otherwise he was just a "nutjob", which doesn't seem to be the case. Nowadays it would be seen as a guy trying to get his 15 minutes of fame on Network TV (this wasn't televised, hence the Zapruder film), or on you tube by a camera phone (didn't exist then), and he did try to get away (hence the killing of Tippett).

Easy to dismiss Ruby as a zealous patriot, who acted on his own - I don't buy that either. Of course this was Texas, so everyone brought guns into Jails with them as a matter of course, right? - lesson learned that maybe screening potential assassins was a good idea in this environment. Having said that, either JR really believed in Omerta (hence why he was tapped), or he gave up a huge payday before he died by not revealing his connections to the crime. So still a quandary either way, which is why it is a mystery 50 years later. That and who really killed Marilyn Monroe (year earlier), is why the Kennedy's remain iconic figures in American lore (since no one normally cares about politicians shortly after they die) to this day. Did Sirhan also act alone? Lots of people wanted the Kennedy's dead, but who would actually arrange for this to happen? Lots of people hate Obama (and other politicians), but he hasn't been assassinated. Why the Kennedy's? Can't believe that these two (Oswald and Sirhan) are the only two "nutjobs" who had motive and opportunity, a little too convenient.

fwiw - Jack Ruby spent a fair amount of time visiting Jimmy Hoffa in prison in the weeks leading up to the assassination. Hoffa happened to be in prison for jury tampering which he believed (as do many others) was a set up by JFK.

sgh wrote:

fwiw - Jack Ruby spent a fair amount of time visiting Jimmy Hoffa in prison in the weeks leading up to the assassination. Hoffa happened to be in prison for jury tampering which he believed (as do many others) was a set up by JFK.

Jack Ruby also had terminal cancer - the perfect assassin scenario........assassin of Oswald that is.

Let me please introduce myself......

voting innocent

CIA/bankers/the UN/LBJ had Jack killed

U.S.A. has always had problems, but since Jack's death......if you are looking for a Defining Moment when U.S. started it's decline this is it!....Since that time Authoritism and Communism have escalated/accelerated at a dangerous rate!

Todays Americans (problems)...is no accident

READ: best seller

"None Dare Call It Conspiracy"

By Gary Allen ..with Larry Abraham

around $12 dollars..get it and wake up!

Only anti-SEMITES think Jack Rubinstein had anything to do with the murder of JFK.

umm, okay?

So there was a white teacher at my school. A mother of an African American student came into the school and blasted this women for being a racist. This White lady promptly introduced this mother to her African American husband and two African American children. Sometimes we ought to think before we react.

Edumacation wrote:

Oswald shot at Kennedy, but did not hit him.

The kill shot came from behind Kennedy, and was fired by one of his secret service agents. That agent shot wildly toward Oswald's position from a rapidly accelerating and moving car. He ended up hitting Kennedy in the back of the head by mistake.

All of this can easily be proven but never will be.

sorry, but it's physically impossible.

one of the weakest of the theories out there.

the video and photos clearly show the top/side of JFK's head exploding, not the back and not the front. the shot came more from above, not directly behind

Today, no prominent liberal would dream of driving through Dallas with the top down.

Wørd wrote:

Today, no prominent liberal would dream of driving through Dallas with the top down.

No liberal in their right mind would drive through Dallas period.

Oswald did it. There are very few successful conspiracies.

codger wrote:

sgh wrote:

fwiw - Jack Ruby spent a fair amount of time visiting Jimmy Hoffa in prison in the weeks leading up to the assassination. Hoffa happened to be in prison for jury tampering which he believed (as do many others) was a set up by JFK.

Jack Ruby also had terminal cancer - the perfect assassin scenario........assassin of Oswald that is.

For a guy with terminal cancer in 1963 he held on for 9 years to die from a pulmonary embolism