Down goes the Dow

Reggie T wrote:

So?

So things are looking good for those in the market.

Wow, this thread is interesting!

Recognizer of Lameness wrote:

Wow, this thread is interesting!

Thanks. I made it.

Klondike5 wrote:

Recognizer of Lameness wrote:

Wow, this thread is interesting!

Thanks. I made it.

Thanks, dude. Can I interest you in some grammar battles?

All three major indices finish up today.

Yannix wrote:

All three major indices finish up today.

Yay!!!

chadhall wrote:

Try to keep up wrote:

Did you even read the responses in that thread? You got shot down pretty good. Very funny.

I saw that thread. Klondike was all "sic is Latin" while making fun of someone using the word "refutate". He got slammed pretty good for that. I don't think he knows what hit him.

You are joking, right?

You do know that "sic" is Latin and that refutate is not a word?

Maybe not.

Recognizer of Lameness wrote:

Yannix wrote:

All three major indices finish up today.

Yay!!!

But why? Because the Dems and GOPers might join together to further ruin the non elite classes? Or kick the can down the road another six weeks?

The market has ceased to be a legit barometer of the worth of stocks and bonds. It is purely speculation

Barry Dander wrote:

Recognizer of Lameness wrote:

Yay!!!

But why? Because the Dems and GOPers might join together to further ruin the non elite classes? Or kick the can down the road another six weeks?...

No. Because this thread has taken lameness to a whole new level.

Grammar wars? Daily (sometimes hourly) market updates (up or down) as if that proves anything at all... This is approaching world record proportions.

Recognizer of Lameness wrote:

Barry Dander wrote:

But why? Because the Dems and GOPers might join together to further ruin the non elite classes? Or kick the can down the road another six weeks?...

No. Because this thread has taken lameness to a whole new level.

Grammar wars? Daily (sometimes hourly) market updates (up or down) as if that proves anything at all... This is approaching world record proportions.

I was talking to the guy who was saying Yay because the market went up today.

Your post has nothing to do with our exchange. You are lame

K5 wrote:

You are joking, right?

You do know that "sic" is Latin and that refutate is not a word?

Maybe not.

Did you learn nothing from your beat down last night in your other thread? You don't know as much Latin as you think you do. Otherwise you would know that 'refutate' is a LATIN word.

Barry Dander wrote:

Recognizer of Lameness wrote:

No. Because this thread has taken lameness to a whole new level.

Grammar wars? Daily (sometimes hourly) market updates (up or down) as if that proves anything at all... This is approaching world record proportions.

I was talking to the guy who was saying Yay because the market went up today.

Your post has nothing to do with our exchange. You are lame

Except of course for that small detail that I AM THE GUY WHO WAS SAYING YAY!!! (although it was not because the market went up - it was for the reason that I just stated).

Small, insignificant detail, I know.

maybe agip is czech

Is there any explanation why the non-existent verb "refutate" is so

widespread among Czechs writing in English apart from its incidence in

Czech-English dictionaries?

Gerry

or latin

http://www.wordsense.eu/refutate/

chadhall wrote:

Did you learn nothing from your beat down last night in your other thread? You don't know as much Latin as you think you do. Otherwise you would know that 'refutate' is a LATIN word.

I'm pretty sure those responses in the other thread were from trolls. Anyway Latin is a dead language.

chadhall wrote:

K5 wrote:

You are joking, right?

You do know that "sic" is Latin and that refutate is not a word?

Maybe not.

Did you learn nothing from your beat down last night in your other thread? You don't know as much Latin as you think you do. Otherwise you would know that 'refutate' is a LATIN word.

I kind of doubt refutate is a Latin word.

And I also kind of doubt that agip would slip into Latin for one word, and then admit he had intended to use the actual word, refute, in a later post were refutate in fact Latin.

You're not very sharp chadhall. I suppose you are an multi-millionaire Ivy League just like agip.

K5 wrote:

chadhall wrote:

Did you learn nothing from your beat down last night in your other thread? You don't know as much Latin as you think you do. Otherwise you would know that 'refutate' is a LATIN word.

I kind of doubt refutate is a Latin word.

And I also kind of doubt that agip would slip into Latin for one word, and then admit he had intended to use the actual word, refute, in a later post were refutate in fact Latin.

You're not very sharp chadhall. I suppose you are an multi-millionaire Ivy League just like agip.

___

'an multi-millionaire'

klondike, when you want to use an indefinite article preceding a consonant, you write 'a' not 'an'

here's a link to help:

but I very glad that I was able to help you learn how to use compound adjectives correctly, as you did with 'multi-millionaire' I do what I can.

Ah.

The multi- millionaire Ivy Leaguer with a perfect family who goes by agip refutates my post by, yet again, pretending he does not know the difference between a typo and a grammar error.

Using an before multi-millionaire instead of a is typical grammar error among the uneducated people make I guess. I often see people mistakenly refer to an monkey, an mansion, an mountain, etc. I am sure he is not being dishonest.

K5 wrote:

Ah.

The multi- millionaire Ivy Leaguer with a perfect family who goes by agip refutates my post by, yet again, pretending he does not know the difference between a typo and a grammar error.

Using an before multi-millionaire instead of a is typical grammar error among the uneducated people make I guess. I often see people mistakenly refer to an monkey, an mansion, an mountain, etc. I am sure he is not being dishonest.

__

ok, gotcha. If you make a typo that means nothing, but if I make a typo it is some kind of evidence?

Please explain.