Racket wrote:
VS-SJW-IR-TS idiot wrote:
I admit complete lack of expertise and understanding in your system, and am prepared to be found completely wrong. Some may be interested to listen to the following Radiolab podcast:
I would put the actual chances at .01%-.05%.
If it somehow does happen (and I don't even know how it could) then you'll likely see quite an uprising.
In case it does happen, I've been saving my celebratory champagne bottles to use as Molotov cocktails.
Meanwhile, file under he who pays the piper calls the tune.
First Sheldon Adelson's paper had that huge "Biden Wins" headline. Today, it has a brutal editorial telling Trump he lost:"(Trump) does a disservice to his more rabid supporters by insisting that he would have won the Nov. 3 election absent voter fraud. That’s simply false."
"There is no evidence, however, that fraud cost Mr. Trump the election, no matter how much the president tweets the opposite and his supporters wish it so...He would remain well behind Mr. Biden in NV even if unverified GOP claims of thousands of illegal votes were dropped..."
"...rhetoric from Trump surrogates alleging widespread illegal activity has been devoid of detailed evidence supporting the charge that there was a concerted effort to 'steal' the election through corruption."
"An electoral system that involves the participation of 150 million Americans will have its share of issues, but it’s an insult to reason and logic to argue that isolated irregularities constitute proof of a grand national conspiracy."
The coup de grace: "Mr. Trump lost this election because he ultimately didn’t attract enough votes and failed to win a handful of swing states that broke his way in 2016."
Adelson is like Reagan emissary Paul Laxalt sent to tell Ferdinand Marcos: "Cut and cut cleanly."
H/T @RalstonReports
So I guess we can assume Adelson will not be contributing to the legal defense fund?