Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Truth or Dare wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Why care what the guy says that sells you the ETFs?
Because he’s got to be smarter than the guy who has lost millions of his investors' money.
No, smart enough to know there will be plenty of investors holding passive investments to the bottom.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
We’ll run the numbers when the S&P 500 is at 950.
Truth or Dare wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
We’ll run the numbers when the S&P 500 is at 950.
Why wait? You can’t just ignore the damage he has done to people’s life savings. This guy has already personally destroyed many people’s chances at a comfortable retirement. Meanwhile he pads his own pockets. He should be vilified, not celebrated. I can’t understand why anyone with a conscience would defend him.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Truth or Dare wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
We’ll run the numbers when the S&P 500 is at 950.
Why wait? You can’t just ignore the damage he has done to people’s life savings. This guy has already personally destroyed many people’s chances at a comfortable retirement. Meanwhile he pads his own pockets. He should be vilified, not celebrated. I can’t understand why anyone with a conscience would defend him.
That is because you are narrow minded.
Truth or Dare wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Truth or Dare wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Why care what the guy says that sells you the ETFs?
Because he’s got to be smarter than the guy who has lost millions of his investors' money.
No, smart enough to know there will be plenty of investors holding passive investments to the bottom.
If that happens, they’ll still be better off than if they had invested with him. He’s the worst.
seattle prattle wrote:
Hussman's Equity funds:
HSGFX - Strategic Growth Fund
HSIEX - Strategic International Fund
HSVLX - Strategic Value Fund
check out their charts. It's consistently down, down, and yet more down.
It's hard to find a single year when they didn't lose money.
If there was a way to short his funds, i'd be all over it.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
seattle prattle wrote:
Hussman's Equity funds:
HSGFX - Strategic Growth Fund
HSIEX - Strategic International Fund
HSVLX - Strategic Value Fund
check out their charts. It's consistently down, down, and yet more down.
It's hard to find a single year when they didn't lose money.
If there was a way to short his funds, i'd be all over it.
I think you would be as unwise to short his funds as it is to hold TNA.
Zo wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
[quote]seattle prattle wrote:
Hussman's Equity funds:
HSGFX - Strategic Growth Fund
HSIEX - Strategic International Fund
HSVLX - Strategic Value Fund
check out their charts. It's consistently down, down, and yet more down.
It's hard to find a single year when they didn't lose money.
If there was a way to short his funds, i'd be all over it.
I think you would be as unwise to short his funds as it is to hold TNA.
Why would U wrote:
What makes you think he does not understand what "short his funds" means?
Try to include some actual facts and logic and stay away from name calling in your response.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
vox clamantis in deserto
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
You better watch your step I may call you a “Harvey Weinstein look-a-like.”
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Huh?? wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
“As we saw within a few sessions of the 2000 and 2007 peaks, it's a concern when weak participation & divergent internals are joined by high-level leadership reversals. The S&P 500 set a new high yesterday, but only 2.5% of NYSE issues did the same, with just as many new lows.”
John Hussman, 9/21/2018
So the S&P set a new record high with fully 1 in 40 issues also setting new highs. And you think this is bad news?
It is not a broad market advance like 2017 thru January 2018. I will leave it up to you to interpret.
Zo wrote:
Why would U wrote:
What makes you think he does not understand what "short his funds" means?
Try to include some actual facts and logic and stay away from name calling in your response.
He said he thinks it “unwise” to short these funds that have a history of going down. Anyone who understands what it means to short something realizes this would be an ideal shorting opportunity, if it were possible.
mellon wrote:
Following his 3 1/2 years of post is not all bad.
mister wrote:
mellon wrote:
Following his 3 1/2 years of post is not all bad.
You would assume a compliment would have subdued his nastiness.
I guess not!
