Example 3:
Relative to interest rates, stock prices are reasonable. We'll never go back to 5% rates, there isn't going to be a 50% stock market decline.
Example 3:
Relative to interest rates, stock prices are reasonable. We'll never go back to 5% rates, there isn't going to be a 50% stock market decline.
Nothing there.
Log this wrote:
Example 3:
Relative to interest rates, stock prices are reasonable. We'll never go back to 5% rates, there isn't going to be a 50% stock market decline.
That’s the funniest one. Just this side of ignorant.
LOL. You mentioned looking like an idiot. Take a long, hard look in the mirror.
Oh so original.
Log this wrote:
Example 2:
It’s your short term calls that you’ve periodically made that look very silly (sornette, recession, various other technicals analysis)
Charting your ignorance:
https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/2018-02-13.png?itok=mzI2qY8fwondering wrote:
What is the significance of using 12 year returns?
Bump.
Here is another article from a bad person:
Feels like we put in a bottom. WHat do you think?
Short term, perhaps, always hard to say. Buy on the dip has worked well so far. But then, it ignores anything fundamental.
I have been waiting a few days to see if it drops down back near the lows, in which case, i would buy. But i get the feeling with prices holding steady, and modest buying, that another dip isn't going to happen. So, if no dip early tomorrow, i probably will buy. Thx.
wondering wrote:
What is the significance of using 12 year returns?
Bump.
Above, last reply to you.
seattle prattle wrote:
I have been waiting a few days to see if it drops down back near the lows, in which case, i would buy. But i get the feeling with prices holding steady, and modest buying, that another dip isn't going to happen. So, if no dip early tomorrow, i probably will buy. Thx.
Might as well flip a coin in my opinion. In the end it will be a bad trade unless you are extremely fortunate.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Above, last reply to you.
Sorry I missed that before. So it’s essentially a market cycle...at least this time.
Least exciting market correction ever. I was hoping for a huge crash today but the inflation numbers weren't quite severe enough. Looks like it'll be another year or two until we get a proper economic collapse
Racket wrote:
Looks like it'll be another year or two until we get a proper economic collapse
Be patient! It's only been 3 years since the expert prediction. Another couple of years wait seems reasonable.
Just think how soft that mattress is going to feel with 2 more years of cash in it.
mellon wrote:
Racket wrote:
Looks like it'll be another year or two until we get a proper economic collapse
Be patient! It's only been 3 years since the expert prediction. Another couple of years wait seems reasonable.
Just think how soft that mattress is going to feel with 2 more years of cash in it.
That's a good point. Plus, the taller the tree, the harder the fall. Hopefully the Dow climbs over 30k and then gets obliterated. The price of homes will get cut in half and only me and supposedly Flagpole will be in a position to weather the storm. Although in that case, I'd be out dancing in the rain.
wondering wrote:
What is the significance of using 12 year returns?
It’s called "cherry picking". Rather than use the typical 10 year return timeframe, this guy chose 12 years to include the last crash and make things look worse than they really are.