• YP
      • RE: Down goes the Dow 7/18/2017 7:17PM - in reply to YP
      • YP
      • Someone is pretending to be me. I made only one post today prior to this one.
    • Zs Top
      • RE: Down goes the Dow 7/18/2017 7:30PM - in reply to YP
      • Zs Top
      • There are a lot of trolls on this thread. If you are bearish I would register my handle. Most of the posters are raving bulls.
    • YP
    • Zs Top
      • RE: Down goes the Dow 7/18/2017 7:43PM - in reply to YP
      • Zs Top
      • True. But when confronted with opposing views some posters are viscous. It apparently is challenging their religion. This is also true in a bull market. The believers are born of Hell's Fire.
    • Zs Top
      • RE: Down goes the Dow 7/18/2017 7:49PM - in reply to YP
      • Zs Top
      • Yes.

        True Believers.

        Born of Hell's Fire.

        Don't challenge the Religion.
    • Trews
      registered
      • RE: Down goes the Dow 7/18/2017 7:57PM - in reply to YP
      • Trews
        registered
      • Igy wrote:
        Maybe Igy knows more than you.
        Igy wrote:
        True. But when confronted with opposing views some posters are viscous.
        LOL
    • Zs Top
    • Trews
      registered
      • RE: Down goes the Dow 7/18/2017 8:08PM - in reply to Zs Top
      • Trews
        registered
      • Another Igy lie. Dishonest as the day is long.

        Also, can't do math or English. LOL
    • The Uncle
      • RE: Down goes the Dow 7/19/2017 9:25AM - in reply to Flagpole
      • The Uncle
      • Flagpole wrote:
        The Uncle wrote:
        Flagpole wrote:
        The Uncle wrote:
        Flagpole wrote:
        Uncle Beemer wrote:
        Aren't you the guy who swore never to return to Letsrun if Trump won?
        Where do people get these ideas? I never said anything of the sort.
        You didn't?

        Wow.
        Correct. I didn't. If you think I did, then go find that proof - you won't be able to, because I never said anything of the sort.
        No worries.

        I started another thread and someone will dig up exactly what you did say.
        Looks like that other thread was deleted. No one will be able to find a post of mine that says I wouldn't ever come back if Trump won, because I never said that or anything even close.
        Not close? You did, I think you will admit, proclaim that HRC had 100% chance of winning as late as the evening of the election while belittling those who did not agree with you. If you did not swear to never post on letsrun.com again, you should have had the decency to have done so.
    • Flagpole
      registered
      • RE: Down goes the Dow 7/19/2017 11:56AM - in reply to The Uncle
      • Flagpole
        registered
      • The Uncle wrote:
        Flagpole wrote:
        The Uncle wrote:
        Flagpole wrote:
        The Uncle wrote:
        Flagpole wrote:
        Uncle Beemer wrote:
        Aren't you the guy who swore never to return to Letsrun if Trump won?
        Where do people get these ideas? I never said anything of the sort.
        You didn't?

        Wow.
        Correct. I didn't. If you think I did, then go find that proof - you won't be able to, because I never said anything of the sort.
        No worries.

        I started another thread and someone will dig up exactly what you did say.
        Looks like that other thread was deleted. No one will be able to find a post of mine that says I wouldn't ever come back if Trump won, because I never said that or anything even close.
        Not close? You did, I think you will admit, proclaim that HRC had 100% chance of winning as late as the evening of the election while belittling those who did not agree with you. If you did not swear to never post on letsrun.com again, you should have had the decency to have done so.
        You are a funny one. Yes, I said Trump had ZERO chance to win, and so far I have been proven wrong about that, BUT, if there is proven collusion with the Russians to help Trump win, then that is cheating, and I will declare that I was right all along...cheaters don't get to claim victory. BUT, what I never said was that I would never post here again if Trump won...whether you believe decency says I should have or not (it doesn't), I didn't do that which is what you said, so you were wrong. That's ok, you can be wrong.
    • Logic 101
      • RE: Down goes the Dow 7/19/2017 12:18PM - in reply to The Uncle
      • Logic 101
      • The Uncle wrote:
        Not close? You did, I think you will admit, proclaim that HRC had 100% chance of winning as late as the evening of the election while belittling those who did not agree with you. If you did not swear to never post on letsrun.com again, you should have had the decency to have done so.
        Using that logic, someone who almost 4 years ago was betting the Dow would go below 13,000 should also have the decency to no longer post on letsrun.
    • Portia
      registered
      • RE: Down goes the Dow 7/19/2017 1:03PM - in reply to Logic 101
      • Portia
        registered
      • We dredged up this “Picture This†history lesson, which we scribed and published years ago, because we keep hearing about valuations being too rich, this is the second longest bull market in history, the economy stinks, there is a stock market crash coming, the Hindenburg Omen, etc. Ladies and gentlemen, there is an old stock market axiom that states, “If you don’t change your indicators to adjust for the changing causal relationships, you are doomed to fail!†In past missives we have expressed the view that there are more high growth/high margin companies in the SPX that ever before, and that the tectonic shift by companies from tangible assets to intangible assets on their balance sheets, by definition suggests PE ratios should be higher than their historic norms. Moreover, to reiterate, if you take out the aberrationally low PEs of the 1970s/1980s that were driven by double-digit inflation/interest rates, and tally the average PE from the beginning of each year starting with 1990 through January of 2017, the average PE for the SPX has been 23.85.

        https://www.advisorperspectives.com/commentaries/2017/07/11/picture-this