Mr. Obvious wrote:
Sprintgeezer wrote:Makhloufi and anybody associated with him is a massive liar.
Disgusting.
Are you going to answer my question? Or just continue to smear somebody based on your subjective biases?
No, I'm not going to answer, because it doesn't deserve it.
MAKHLOUFI IS OUT, HOPEFULLY FOREVER.
Mission accomplished, for now. There remains more to do.
Mack daddy was doping last year, if you deny it you mind as well say lance is clean as well.
Get Real wrote:
Anyone with a brain who watched that race (and the semi-final) knew Makhloufi was doping. I'm sure others in the race were as well, but he made it too obvious.
Why? What are these criteria I can use to identify dopers based on watching their races?
Do they apply to good white American boys or only dirty Arabs?
Nobody really gets viral infections! all of those remedies at the drugstore are just a coverup!
Qosol Wayne wrote:
You guys are pathetic , makhloufi been diagnosed with hepatitis A one month ago and missed training around 5 week, ignorant think athlete get back up from iaaf if that is the case why exposé guy,Powell , VCB !!!!!!!!
Show some sympathy and respect to makhloufi for him to recover from the illness.
Much more likely he was diagnosed with positivis A and positivis B and was forced to bow out of worlds with a "viral infection" that he picked up from WADA.
I think it had something to do with last year, when allegations of his Olympic doping went viral.
You seriously need to be banned. So sick of the baseless accusations on this site. These are real athletes you're talking about, where just a simple accusation can have consequences.
1 - Get a life.
2 - Brojos, your site is a f**king joke. This place is the National Enquirer of running.
From now on he will be referred as DrugFlukey. So let it be written, so let it be done. Makhloufi is Drugflukey.
Mr. Obvious wrote:
Define outlier? Who is an outlier who is currently competing? How come Makloufi does not qualify as one?
He does not NEED to qualify as one. His performance was not any kind of outlier. If Silas, Asbel, Nick Willis, and Chepseba were healthy and in form, most if not all would have beaten him in London and we would never be having this discussion despite that he would have run just as fast.
Sprintgeezer, what on earth kind of evidence is there that he was doping?
The only real reason anyone has is that he's Algerian, probably doesn't speak English, and therefore we don't know anything about him. But there is nothing about his performance or progression that is suspicious.
So you decided to include Rudisha in your list? King David has been kicking butt for a long time. He was running well before injury.
I am getting tired of defending you ageing imbecile
Simpson? As in JB? Based on what!?
Top reasons Makhloufi is an obvious cheater:
1. He improved from 3:32 to 3:30 in one year, and runs 1:43-high, putting him near the same category as Alan Webb (the clean WR holder as everyone knows)
2. He's not white, or not white enough at least, and doesn't have access to the Nike campus, where clean champions are made
3. He beat un-beatable Manzano and Centro at the Olympics, along with Iguider and the Norwegian dude with his ballsack nearly hanging out of his speedsuit to round out the top 5.
(Side note: The last lap for both Makh and Leo was a blazing 52.6, but given Leo's history at world championships this shouldn't be suspicious for him)
4. He's had "trouble training" this year with "illness." Obviously dodging the World Championships is a great move for his athletics career and can totally see why he would want to do that.
killarney wrote:
Mr. Obvious wrote:Define outlier? Who is an outlier who is currently competing? How come Makloufi does not qualify as one?
He does not NEED to qualify as one. His performance was not any kind of outlier. If Silas, Asbel, Nick Willis, and Chepseba were healthy and in form, most if not all would have beaten him in London and we would never be having this discussion despite that he would have run just as fast.
Well, that was kind of my point but SprintGeezer says the issue and definition don't even need to be addressed and are silly, despite him being the one to bring up the term in the first place.
It's fun to smear people's reputation with no evidence!!!
Ridiculous wrote:
You seriously need to be banned. So sick of the baseless accusations on this site. These are real athletes you're talking about, where just a simple accusation can have consequences.
1 - Get a life.
2 - Brojos, your site is a f**king joke. This place is the National Enquirer of running.
This sure didn’t age well.
https://www.insidethegames.biz/articles/1100011/makhloufi-subject-to-doping-probe-franceMr. Obvious wrote:
killarney wrote:
He does not NEED to qualify as one. His performance was not any kind of outlier. If Silas, Asbel, Nick Willis, and Chepseba were healthy and in form, most if not all would have beaten him in London and we would never be having this discussion despite that he would have run just as fast.
Well, that was kind of my point but SprintGeezer says the issue and definition don't even need to be addressed and are silly, despite him being the one to bring up the term in the first place.
It's fun to smear people's reputation with no evidence!!!
See above post.
Leo MF Manzano is the 2012 Olympic Gold Medalist!
pinched wrote:
Ridiculous wrote:
You seriously need to be banned. So sick of the baseless accusations on this site. These are real athletes you're talking about, where just a simple accusation can have consequences.
1 - Get a life.
2 - Brojos, your site is a f**king joke. This place is the National Enquirer of running.
This sure didn’t age well.
https://www.insidethegames.biz/articles/1100011/makhloufi-subject-to-doping-probe-france
Yeah, they found aminoacids. Oh the drama!