Suzy Favor Hamilton name dropped from Big 10 award

What good is a SFH post without pics?

https://www.instagram.com/p/BvZgaeEgYax/

T.M.A.D.H.A.S.F.N.E.

.Trump2020OP-the real one......... wrote:

What good is a SFH post without pics?

https://www.instagram.com/p/BvZgaeEgYax/

T.M.A.D.H.A.S.F.N.E.

That’s not a pic of SFH. That is a pic she posted of Naked Yoga Girl.

However, SFH does post beautiful, tasteful nude photos of herself . Kudos to her!

Some people only look on the surface about her story. She was in the throws of undiagnosed mental illness and trying to self harm herself with her secret actions. This is actually more common than people are aware of. After being outed she finally got the help she needed and now is doing very well creating awareness and of mental illness and providing a platform for others to address and deal their own battles/struggles.

Her own photos are a way for her explore her sexuality and build self confidence/esteem in a healthy way. Her photos are usually accompanied with a writing delving into aspects being empowered and empowering others.

Let’s drop the stigma of mental illness. It is on the rise amongst our youth and we are seeing more and more athletes in the news usually because the couldn’t cope and weren’t getting the proper care or addressing it at all.

Everyone’s brain is different. Everyone acts the way they do based on their genetics and their upbringing yet we now forgive behavior that crosses a line but we scorn behavior that comes close to a line. The behavior that absolutely crosses the line, we call mental illness. We used to call homosexuality a mental illness but now we say it is ok because that is how someone’s brain is wired. Someone like Suzy, we try to get help to change her just like we used to do for homosexuals. It is all about what society views as moral behavior. There are people that each of us dislikes due to their personality but we should really not blame them either because they are also merely a product of their genes and their environment.

The left isn't maintaining laws against prostitution. It's progressive places that have legalized it.

Tried reading this thread but the ads keot interfering with my experience.

Every time I was reading your responses the page would move or fold due to the Click to Continue.

Legislator wrote:

Isn't it really the left who judges? The right doesn't care about what type of life people live. The left however, wants to force their morality on others. Legislating morals is favored by the left much more than the right. The right would like employers to hire who they choose or to rent to who they choose or to serve who they choose. Nobody is questioning the organization's right to choose her as their featured speaker. In fact, Republicans will fight to allow organizations to feature whoever they want. See what happens if a speaker comes to a college that the lefty students don't agree with though. They resort to violence in an effort to stifle free speech. All of a sudden the left cheers for the students not allowing the speaker to enter the arena.

This is your perception based on your news sources. You listen to right leaning sources who demonize "liberals". Violence is wrong in almost every case, but is not limited to conservatives or liberals, democrats or republicans. Neo Nazis usually vote as conservative republicans. When they went to Charlottesville, they were there to promote a message of hate and defend it with violence. They were easily provoked by protestors.

The method of liberals is typically to introduce laws that enforce equality. The method of conservatives is to appoint judges to rule against such laws. Neither method is always effective. They are just two methods of imposing a belief system on others via the law so it gains legitimacy.

College speakers are often liberal people. That is because institutions of higher education favor the educated and favor those who tend to write and speak of things that are esoteric and are intended for the greater good of society - a typically liberal idea set. So when someone who tends to speak and write of exclusion, racism, violence, etc. they are typically not invited or are protested. Violence is pretty rare, but it does happen and is usually the fault of 2 people, not just one.

It is ridiculous to act as if either side is the moral untouchable.

I don't have cable. The only news outlets I watch are the ones I get with my rabbit ears, CBS, NBC, PBS, and ABC. Antiabortion speakers are the epitome of anti-violence, yet they are often shouted down at colleges or worse, met with violence. Speakers who want to discuss the facts about the number of fake hate crimes that are reported are also not welcomed. Speakers who want to discuss the facts regarding children being raised in 2 parent households are not welcomed. None of these speakers have anything to do with exclusion or racism or violence. They merely want to present facts. Colleges should want to hear about facts so that students can then form an educated opinion regarding a particular topic. My experience is that Republicans accept people for who they are but Democrats are not willing to do the same.

Suzy Favor is still a big name here at Stevens Point, WI. Awards banquets constantly mention her

Realistically, I think her husband is either a fool or deserves an award. Who in their right mind would actually help her get ready to go get laid as a call girl and stay married to her?

Legislator wrote:

I don't have cable. The only news outlets I watch are the ones I get with my rabbit ears, CBS, NBC, PBS, and ABC. Antiabortion speakers are the epitome of anti-violence, yet they are often shouted down at colleges or worse, met with violence. Speakers who want to discuss the facts about the number of fake hate crimes that are reported are also not welcomed. Speakers who want to discuss the facts regarding children being raised in 2 parent households are not welcomed. None of these speakers have anything to do with exclusion or racism or violence. They merely want to present facts. Colleges should want to hear about facts so that students can then form an educated opinion regarding a particular topic. My experience is that Republicans accept people for who they are but Democrats are not willing to do the same.

You have a perception that is clearly biased toward Republicans/conservatives always being right, moral and accepting of others. Some are, some are not. Some conservatives went out of their way to eat at Chik-fil-a when they made anti LGBT statements and donated to anti LGBT causes. This was a large movement and clearly not a sign of acceptance. Some liberals chose not to eat there again. Not all, but some.

The majority of college speakers are academic or industry leaders such as authors or scientists or executives. There are probably examples similar to what you describe above, but those would be a very, very small percentage of speakers at colleges.

SFH falls under the Author category. People are free to protest her appearance.

There are many examples of anti-abortion activists doing violent things. "Discussing" fake hate crimes is usually denial of their existence. There are FBI and police statistics on hate crimes, but the "discussion" probably does not include those.

Conservatives have traditional views and that is fine. But everyone does not have a financially stable 2 parent household. Single parents or dual working parents or poor people are not evil and all of their children do not turn out evil. I am a Liberal / Democrat and I can accept them and LGBT people and religious people and atheists. I can accept that your views are different from mine and not resort to violence. I am not likely to change your opinion, but hopefully this discussion has made us both think about another point of view.

One person's rights end where another person's begin. Live and let live. Everyone would do well to remember that.

Legislator wrote:

The right doesn't care about what type of life people live.

Except when women get legal abortions.

Disney56 wrote:

Realistically, I think her husband is either a fool or deserves an award. Who in their right mind would actually help her get ready to go get laid as a call girl and stay married to her?

A real man that truly understands and knows how to be caring of another and not abandon someone. To be there while they work through their shadow side.

Her husband obviously understood the issue was deeper than just sex.

Devine Warrior wrote:

Disney56 wrote:

Realistically, I think her husband is either a fool or deserves an award. Who in their right mind would actually help her get ready to go get laid as a call girl and stay married to her?

A real man that truly understands and knows how to be caring of another and not abandon someone. To be there while they work through their shadow side.

Her husband obviously understood the issue was deeper than just sex.

Some guys, especially those with small peens, are into being cucked by their wives.

SFH goes down.

Oh the irony in your quote. The right does not care about why type life someone lives. An abortion is taking a life which is the complete opposite caring about life. Did you know that there is a $250k fine for destroying an eagle’s egg but there is no punishment for destroying an unborn human baby?