king99 wrote:
yeah ..thats me the ultimate BS artist, for some reason and i'm not sure why..i can see there is almost an incredible elitist attitude thrown around on these boards, an fair amount of obscene language and classless inuendo as just demonstrated by yourself..its this "I'm a better runner than you are mentality therefore I know more than you" attitude that has people even defending the folks that critiqued Rojo's comment on Galloway ,even though I agree with most of your brothers assessment..A source is just that, a Source ..if they wanted to post it themselves they would have, right?? However it might compromise their position..I would say this..my source could be wrong..however it;s not something I , he or someone made up...
By the way the deal I heard was not 8 it was 5..so in between the 3 and 8 number..
King I didn't call you a bs artist. I'm just saying that anyone can post on here what they want and pretend to be reliable when they may not be, but now I tend to agree with you.
However, I don't think your sources are too different than mine. A 5 year deal for $250,000 with a lot of it guaranteed I wouldn't rule that completely out. These contracts are highly subjective. I would definitely rule out 8 years at $250,000 guaranteed however. So we agree more on this one than we disagree. The tough thing with these contracts is that unless we see the actual contract we won't know for sure. It could be 3 years guaranteed, with less the next 2 years, 5 years guaranteed, who knows. If a figure is quoted it could be a figure that is way above the base. So it all is speculation. My main point was not to just believe something because it is in the Washington Times. I too think Webb will be a Nike man anyday now.