grasshoppers need to learn that you can't run sub 13 in a non-sub 13 race. that is if you're playing tactics with the field.
rupp is only a couple of seconds off a sub 12:50 guy. how can you conclude that he somehow can't run a good 5k?
predicting times is a pretty simple affair.
the bro-joes, even canova seem to lose track of the simple realities.
if you beat a 12:50 guy and that 12:50 guy is in shape.
that's the league you're in. that's the time you can run, sure. if you can go 330 1500m and 12:35 10k, the 12:50 is a given in terms of potential. go ahead and name a guy that could do both over and under times that did not run the great 5k.
if rupp was in the perfect race and a bunch of african boys were, by good fortune on their games, he could easily scoot to a 12:50 in 5th place. what would that prove? nothing.
a superior performance would be 13 flat in the rain with a see-saw pace.
kiprop for example was the world's best 1500 runner for quite some time before he laid down a fast time. he was even wondering himself, wtf.
you simply gotta be in shape and catch that good race to clock the times vert is so often speculating about.
it's hit and miss unless you are legend.