Runthedistance wrote:
Kenyans are the most tested, that is a bad thing, Kenyans are not tested enough, that is a bad thing. Kenyans use EPO, I am not saying Kenyans use EPO. These are the people who are out to malign Kenya and they don't care about the facts. Kenyans are going to rule middle and long distane running and there is nothing you can do about it. Think anyway you want and lets do what we do best.
You're the one that doesn't listen to facts, and responds to posts whilst tearful without actually comprehending what is being said to you.
1. Kenya are NOT the most tested: They're the most tested by the IAAF (well, Jamaica fanboys say the same thing about Jamaica, but hey I'll give you it because the bottom lip is trembling again.)
2. Kenyans are not tested enough: Yes, I agree. IAAF carried out 14 blood tests AROUND THE WORLD in 2010 out of competition. The only remotely reliable way of catching a EPO/blood doper. How many of those were in Kenya? Even if it's all of them (which it's not.) it's hardly going to catch anyone.
UK anti doping, for example, does many more tests in a year (of British athletes only) than the IAAF does in an entire year out of competition. So to suggest that Kenya gets tested more than Britain is a fallacy. I'm sure many other countries are the same.
3. Kenya is going to rule middle and long distance: Along with Ethiopia and other countries that purchase Africans I agree. I've never said any different. If you'd actually read anything I've wrote whilst not being all emotional and angry, you'd notice that I've always said that East Africans are not dominant in running because of doping, they would be in charge anyway even if nobody doped.
Does this make sense to you, or are you still crying?