I tend not to use the treadmill unless its hailing or something. I would 99% of the time rather run outside.
As for the jog recoveries, depending on what type of workout you're doing, you guys should try and cover some distance during that 60 second recovery. It really makes the workout very aerobic.
I ran 1:56 my sophomore year in college, and I always thought I should have run faster. I did one workout where I ran 4x400 in 57, 56, 56, 55 with 5:00 recoveries, another where I did 12x200 with 200 rest in 25-26, and another when I ran a 600 in 1:25, 300 recovery, a 300 in 39, 150 recovery, 150 in 19 (all on indoor tracks). Yet I only ran 1:56 (and even that was out of the blue. I was mostly running 2:00 and then ran 1:58 and 1:56). I always thought 1:53 was doable.
But now I see what the issue was. I was not aerobically strong at all. I could pound out fast repeats, which is fine if you're running a 400, or even a 600. My muscle memory was great and I taught my muscles how to run fast. But my aerobically, I was incredibly weak (even though I could generally hammer a 10 miler).
If you look at that 200 workout, yes, I had a 200 jog, but I would stop after the interval, stretch for maybe 10-20 seconds, then start a stumble, then by 100 out, the stumble would turn to a jog and then before the interval, I would come to a creep again, and then take off. All in all, I was EASILY taking 2+ minutes to get through 200 meters.
Had I slowed up my intervals to say 28-29 (which would have been cruising back then... now its probably closer to 34-5) but went straight into my 200 recovery and did that in 60 seconds, I think I aerobically would have had a lot of trouble (though muscularly it would have been fine). I think if I had done that more, I would have been a lot better.
Looking back, our best 5k guys and milers always "hammered" their recoveries. I thought they were pretty stupid. Turns out the joke was on me and, quite frankly, it clearly is why I was a workout hero. Anyone can pound an interval with sufficient rest while tricking themselves that they're only taking 200 meters recovery. Not everyone can run controlled and run an uptempo recovery. THAT takes aerobic strength! I always though "workout heros" had mental issues more then physical ones. Afterall, how could they run so fast in a workout and then bomb in a race? I think its probably more like 5 out of 10 are not aerobically fit, and if you watch their workout, are likely taking their rests easier then their better teammates. I think 3 out of 10 are probably leaving their races on the track and 2 out of 10 are headcases. Of course, all may END UP head cases because they're not performing at the level they feel like they should be, but I don't think it starts that way.
The other thing that I found interesting is that you can be seemingly aerobically strong (i.e. be able to run a hard 10 miles) and fast (i.e. hammer a 200) but not be able to bridge the gap. I suppose its possible to have a high AT and be fast, but be very poorly trained in that V02Max range.
I think that is very much me. Hopefully its a weakness I can work on and make a strength. If so, I think I can do pretty well in the next few months.