duckshirt wrote:
SmalltimeT wrote:A conservative and fairly accurate prediction would be in the 2:03-2:06 range, I think much slower than a 2:06 would be deemed a poor performance. Best case scenario I think 2:01ish. A 50 second 400 guy moving up to the 8 for the first time usually runs close to 2 flat give or take 2 seconds and men have better endurance. This is a race for the ages though as we distance runners always want to know how sprinters would fair moving up.
are you sure men have better endurance? look how close the marathon world records are (2:03:59 to 2:15:xx)
11 minutes is not a long time, right.
Look how close the 100m are! They're separated by like 1 second!