Historically yes, the NYRR has not done a great job in helping our mid-level distance guys. However, more recently, I think they have done better. Last year they hosted the 10000 on the west coast, and road championships along the way. Not to mention sponsorship of clubs and scholarships also. The NYCM has been friendlier to our 'B' level runners too.As a loose analogy, I can see NYRR (and the BAA, Chicago organizers) as the Yankees/Bosox. They got the big money to spend and they do, going after the already established stars-U.S. and foreign. The smaller races are more like the Rays, Twins. Have less to work with, and need to be a little more creative to be successful. There is room for all to co-exist. (After all, all players hope to hit the huge contract with the Yanks/Sox/Phillies, etc). BTW, I am a registered Yankee hater.But the main goal is to grow the pyramid. Bigger base can support more stars.
malmo wrote:
LI Runner wrote:Malmo,
Not sure I understand the reference to MW. Is it because NYRR might cater to the already established U.S. elite runners?
That's precisely my point. All the money that NYRRC pissed away on Ritzenhein, who could only muster 2:14 in ideal conditions, would have been better spent on providing incentive/opportunity for an additional 50 athletes.
NYRRC had historically turned their backs on American athletes, and only made a feigned effort at catering to them in recent years.
Now here we have a small marathon in Vermont, offering $750 bonus to those who qualify for the OT. Certainly won't change anyone's life, but will at least pay for most the travel expenses for those athletes who are on the cusp. Makes me want to drive up to Vermont and man the water stations for them.
Joe Connelly should be applauded.