Any guys not circumcised but wish they were??

Imagine the uproar if guys insisted that all women be neat and tidy down there. No excess flaps etc.

Beef curtain wrote:

Imagine the uproar if guys insisted that all women be neat and tidy down there. No excess flaps etc.

true.

you don't have to circumcise your son.

washing it has never really been a hassle for me.

to be honest, its an unnecessary procedure.

Plus you'll save money.

if your son is angry that you didn't(which I highly doubt), tell him money was tight in this poor economy.

forget the lotion wrote:

not being circ'd has been awesome for me. no lotion needed during self induced action.

Do circumcised guys need lotion to JO?

[/quote]

Do circumcised guys need lotion to JO?[/quote]

Yes, or else the friction can cause it to fall off in some cases.

From my own personal experience, no. I never understood the association with lotion and masturbation.

never knew that wrote:

forget the lotion wrote:

not being circ'd has been awesome for me. no lotion needed during self induced action.

Do circumcised guys need lotion to JO?

i think it's a cosmetic thing. They just look better cut. more normal. but that's a societal thing.

I think the ridicule is overrated. He just needs to be prepared for it. To be honest, I was surprised at the other kids. When they pointed it out - I would say that is how we were all born and, if they persisted, I just asked the other guys why they were checking me out so much. That usually shuts them up.

I will not get graphic but I would think it makes sex easier and more pleasurable but I obviously have no experience to compare it to.

And, in my experience, girls do not care.

I would not change and would my son decide himself when he is a teenager.

don't do it. Once it's cut it's gone for good.

Cut dicks are boring. Give him a chance at real fun later.

Because they don't see many of them, the females here in the states are often fascinated with an uncut dick and play with it forever and ever.

you can still get circumsized later in life. It is still considered to be a minor surgery at either age.

the only people who really advocate not doing it are those who aren't cut themselves. misery loves company.

chicks do not dig foreskin.

snip it.

Don't do it. I had to give it a lot of thought recently, as I have an infant boy. At first I was very clear about wanting him circumcised- for many of the same reasons mentioned in this thread. But I finally came to the conclusion I grew up in a different world than boys born today. When I was born, over 90% of boys were circumcised in the US. There was a stigma attached to having foreskin. Those days are gone for new baby boys. Only 50% of boys born in the US are now circumcised. That is all I needed to hear. That percentage will continue to drop as we continue to ask the question; why? I predict as these percentages change, we are only a few decades away from the reverse stigma. Boys without foreskin will be perceived as having ignorant parents who chose mutilation based on a bizarre tradition nobody understands anymore.

When you look into the eyes of your baby boy, please consider the excruciating pain he will have to go though (that's right; excruciating!) for his cosmetic surgery. Be the Dad with vision and wisdom. Protect him from this archaic custom. Don't do it.

We just had a baby boy. I chose not to snip him because there is really no reason to and it cost more than leaving his wang alone. Having a baby is expensive enough.

All of this is a great read! You can't lose either way so it's not a big decision. It's a total social norm thing however many people posted that the social norm is now shifting... so who knows about social norms in the future?

What is funny is that a few people have suggested that some women are turned off by foreskin. Yet no one has mentioned a woman who is turned off by a circumcised penis. So if you are a betting man... I'd say circumcise your son as too take away that 5% of women being turned off by him. But like I said... in twenty years social norms may change at women may be turned off by circumcised penises!!!!! Wouldn't that be an "I told you so" for all the dudes on this board defending their non circumcision.

never knew that wrote:

Do circumcised guys need lotion to JO?

Wait, do uncircumcized guys not? Please tell me your foreskin does not have THAT much mucus inside it. If so, that might be the most disgusting thing I've ever heard.

Oh wow, I just Googled "smegma". Then I saw the Google image search. That is horrifying.

Snip it man, snip it.

How could circumcised look more normal when it actually isn't? Do you think you would look at a circumcised African woman and say she looks "normal"?

I have never had a day where I regretted having foreskin.

If I want to be circumcised I have that choice. The reason you don't hear circumcised guys say they would have rather been un-circumcised is because they can't be.

Let your son make decisions about his own body.

It would be like Pistorious saying he was glad he didn't have real legs.

omg wut wrote:

Oh wow, I just Googled "smegma". Then I saw the Google image search.

That's pretty gay (you looking up penises on Google images). Why don't you look up images of botched circumcisions?