Well, I said that *I think* he could have gone under 13 because he never actually did. We're just making predictions here, even if you use some program with complex algorithms to try and compare other times to get a prediction it is still a prediction. And it pretty much means nothing as Morceli has retired and will never race again so the chances of him running 12:55 are most likely zilch.
And I stand by my earlier post: he could probably have gone under 13:00, and close to 12:50. Both of those can be true, it's not like I said he can run 12:45 but not under 12:50.
So no, I won't give a number...what if he leans at the tape or coasts the last 10 meters, what if he has pacing for 2k or 3k or 4k, what if he pulls a muscle in the last 60m and that affects the time by .35 seconds? Maybe he runs 12:48.45 in the ideal race, maybe he runs 12:51.29 but the one thing I am sure about is that it doesn't matter that much.
So yea, you can go and input your data into your stupid little website and then post the results here to the hundredth place like you thought them up, feel good about yourself but in reality they don't mean anything.
That's all I have to say to you on that topic.
Daniel K Komen has ran 3:29 and is a great time trialer...maybe he could break 13:00 and join the club.