BB1985 wrote:
That's exactly what I'm saying. If Webb's senior high school time was good enough to be top 100 in college... and he wasn't even training to be a 400 m runner then... The reason I'm curious is as follows: If he is fast enough to be an elite college 400 m runner, then do you simply have to possess the natural ability to be a world class sprinter to be one of the top distance runners. Because people dog on his kick and raw speed, but it does seem to me that had he always trained for the 400 m instead of longer races, that he could've been relevant collegiately. Which led to my El G question. Could he have been one of the best 400 m runners in the world.
And no I wasn't trolling. Jeremy Wariner's 100m I could not find. I was just curious. I don't think he should move down, or up. Just curious. I've got a friend who is a 400 m runner who says he could beat Wariner in the 100 m. I call BS, this guy can run sub-10.3, sub 21, sub 46... I thought Wariner could go sub-10.2, maybe even sub 10.1, but I don't know if he's done it or not.