geesh Radcliffe admits being on drugs and look at the headline

DR = OY

....?

YOU be the judge...

It would certainly explain a lot.

Well, Dunes certainly has a hard-on for OY. But wait, if Pete is right about Dunes being a her, I guess that would be impossible.

Now the name Dunes Runner I always assumed was Herb Elliot/Percy Cerutty inspired. That would still make me peg Dunes as a guy. But is it possible that 'Dunes Runner' is really in reference to Kobo Abe's Kafka-esque modern classic: "Woman in the Dunes" ??

So the question is: is Dunes Runner a Herb Elliot wannabe, or really another Woman in the Dunes ?

LA/Pure running wrote:

So the question is: is Dunes Runner a Herb Elliot wannabe, or really another Woman in the Dunes ?

I think it was just a typo. I think she meant to use "prunes runner" due to all the prune juice she has to drink to ward off urinary tract infections

dunes runner wrote:

she's failed to produce any test results that weren't positive.

There's a lot of rubbish on this board sometimes, but that is the most bizarre and mind-baffling thing I have ever read. Paula may or may not be on drugs, but dunes runner is definitely on something.

Take a look at this Dunes runner.

Take a good look at this part.

"UK Sport has already revealed that Radcliffe has tested negative for drugs five times in the last year."

Is that good enough evidence for you or are you going to continue saying stupid things that have no evidence to support them???

I'm still trying to figure out where in that article Radcliffe "admits being on drugs"

Average_Joe wrote:

dunes runner wrote:

If she hasn't failed a drug test then where are the results of her drug tests.

The same place that all negative drug tests are. Sitting in somebody's file somewhere at a drug testing lab. Nobody goes out and "publicizes" negative results. What's the point? As long as they pass, nobody cares. They only care about the postive ones.

Where are the results of all of the tests Yegorova has passed? If we don't have them all, does that mean she's a dirty drug cheat then?

See that's exactly what I'm talking about.

They take her positive drug tests and put them in a file with everyone else's negative results.

Then we hear all this publicity about how clean of a runner she is.

"UK Sport reveals Radcliffe has tested negative for drugs five times."

Uh huh.

Well now we know who's running things don't we.

UK Sport.

Somewhere, out there, a village is being deprived of an idiot.

You have raised the bar for everyone in terms of ignorance and incoherence on this board - which is no mean feat.

Next time, double the recommended dosage, take a nice long nap and avoid heavy machinery.

Martin

dunes runner wrote:

See that's exactly what I'm talking about.

They take her positive drug tests and put them in a file with everyone else's negative results.

Then we hear all this publicity about how clean of a runner she is.

"UK Sport reveals Radcliffe has tested negative for drugs five times."

Uh huh.

Well now we know who's running things don't we.

UK Sport.

1. Nope. Sorry. They do no such thing.

2. Yegorova's Federation, however definitely covers up all her drug tests. They bury the paperwok. All the time. She's dirty.

My evidence for this is accusation? It's in the same cabinet with all your evidence that Radcliffe ever tested postive.

3. UK Sport does not run the rest of the sporting world, Brainiac. To wit:

- 2002 Chicago Marathon in which Paula set the world record last year.

- 2001 and 2002 World Cross Country Championships which Paula won

- 2002 European Championships in which Paula ran 30:01 in August of last year to set the European record

All of these events drug test. UK Sport has does not control them or their drug testing procedures. No positive results from any of them. At Chicago, after they were going to let her go without testing her (due to an IAAF surprise test which she had just passed), Paula demanded to be tested. Let's see Yegorova do that. Not likely

Once again,

Another retarded post by Dunes Runner.

Martin wrote:

Somewhere, out there, a village is being deprived of an idiot.

True but I think it helps if you to these "debates" as a form of entertainment. If nothing else, it is a chance to practice good lines. The one of yours (quoted here above) is priceless.

All of these events drug test. UK Sport has does not control them or their drug testing procedures. No positive results from any of them. At Chicago, after they were going to let her go without testing her (due to an IAAF surprise test which she had just passed), Paula demanded to be tested. Let's see Yegorova do that. Not likely.

If she took the tests, and supposedly passed, then were are the test results?

If there are, really, any test results for her, then where are they?

It doesn't surprise me that Martin has no clue, with all the drugs he's taking and listed on another thread.

But some of the rest of you should be able to figure it out.

dunes runner wrote:

If she took the tests, and supposedly passed, then were are the test results?

We've been over this already. They're in the cabinet along with all other other negative tests.

Where are Yegorova's results? How do we know she really passed?

At this point I have no interest in Dunes' opinion on drugs or PR or OY, but I am intrigued about the sex of this whacky person.

C'mon Dunes, male or female? Settle that debate.

If you really want access to her negative drug tests, why don't you contact the iaaf or great britain atheltics and ask for them. they'll probably tell you hell no because there's something called a consent form. if you've ever had a drug test you'll sign one. it basically allows certain people to see the results and others cannot. we never will see lagat's positive test because it isn't released; the iaaf just reports it to the media and announces their sanction.

Title IX fanatic to the point of wanting to kill for it. Dunes = womyn.

Dunes Runner, girl or boy, you're a PRICK.

We realize the point of your posting is just to aggravate everyone on this board, but really, are you as dumb as you post?