It never ends said:
If you take someone that trains several years and has reached a peak with "simple" training, whatever that may be, then after learning pose they become faster, that is proof in the pudding. It is merely necessary to show that the athletes had trained hard for XX years and had competed to the best of their ability before learning pose.
You can't use the argument that improved PRs aren't proof merely because people can improve PRs by following other regimens. You are isolating pose by definition as invalid by that assumption.
Life is subjective, we all have our opinions. What I have said is clearly not the first time it has been said on either this forum in letsrun or Posetech regarding an essential part of the pose concept being an application of perceptions in conjunction with specific patterns of motion, form, and balance defined by the pose constructs. What I said complements what other Pose posters have said, not contradicts it.
I don't think anyone is laughing.
I don't see any lack of connection or relevance to the topic at hand except your inability to respond to my specific points and substitution of insults for logic.
Actually, perceptions has also been discussed. You are the one who prefers redirecting all discussions back to physics because this topic is easy to ridicule.
Having been on the pose site quite a bit, I would agree that use of physics is not providing any better understanding of the technique. In that sense pose proponents are their own worst enemies in this forum domain. However, that there is an actual method behind it that works for a lot of runners of all calibers, ranging from recreational, healthy, injured, competitive amateur, even to highly competitive. However, the posters on this forum have redirected every attempt at discussing form and technique, which would normally be the points of interest on other forums that aren't as antagonistic and hostile as letsrun.com.