I (24, male, thin but never particularly athletic) started running relatively late (age 19) and from the jump I was focused on keeping easy runs easy and running as much mileage as possible. Within a year I was running 50 miles per week, and within another I was doing those 50 mpw with consistent, hard (but not too hard) workouts — usually a tempo and a track workout every week, a 90+ minute LR every Sunday, plus regular strides/hills. 50 mpw is high volume for a guy running 9+ minutes/mile, but I listened to my body and I never got injured.
My HR kept dropping, my workouts kept improving, and yet my race times never improved. After three years of (relatively) consistent training like this, my SB mile time worsened from 6:11 to 6:31 (both indoor, same track) and my 5k PR squeaked from ~22 minutes to 21:37. By September 2023 I was doubling 4x/week running 60 miles/9 hours of weekly volume and even though my body felt great it was just too much. To train so much and stay so slow can turn you into a bit of a headcase. I got so frustrated I quit for 9 months, but as of last Monday I'm back.
It's not up for debate whether those years of high volume helped me — even after 9 months off, an easy run at around 9' pace still has me at a HR of ~140-150, and my body became very efficient with recovery. But I'm 6 feet tall, I've got pretty long legs, and it felt like my 9-10' easy pace was so physiologically different from 6-7' pace that nothing besides pure aerobic gains translated. Luckily, the aerobic gains are still there, even after almost a year of no running.
I'm tired of banging my head against the wall with high, uber-slow mileage. I think, at least for the summer, I'm going to stick to ~30 mpw max, not worry about workouts besides strides, and see if I can pick up the pace a bit. Does this make any sense from a training perspective, or would I be better served just sucking it up and getting back on the mileage grind? Would appreciate some perspective.