"Live" - whatever. I saw the full race. It was a good race and Simpson finished strongly, closing on Keino. However I clearly remember the article with the doping admission some months later, so it bemuses me there is now no record of it. I can't think of who it might have been if not Simpson because it referred to Kingston and Simpson's race. It may have been that he was persuaded to withdraw his admission because he hadn't been busted.
When caught lying his answer is "whatever".
It was a trivial point. Made by a trivial mind. I said I saw the race. Which I did. It is irrelevant whether or not it was "live".
Not drivel ; only to point out the contradictions and your inability to justify attacking a fine gentleman.
Fine gentlemen have been known to dope. I guess every thread on this site about Kipchoge and every other runner suspected or accused of doping - including those convicted, like Houlihan - requires an "apology" to you. You will be a long time waiting.
Not drivel ; only to point out the contradictions and your inability to justify attacking a fine gentleman.
Fine gentlemen have been known to dope. I guess every thread on this site about Kipchoge and every other runner suspected or accused of doping - including those convicted, like Houlihan - requires an "apology" to you. You will be a long time waiting.
You invent a story from your own mind of which every detail has been ridiculed. You said there was published evidence yet you can’t find anything to substantiate it.
This is different from from saying there are suspicions.
Apologise for saying that Alan Simpson said he took drugs.
Fine gentlemen have been known to dope. I guess every thread on this site about Kipchoge and every other runner suspected or accused of doping - including those convicted, like Houlihan - requires an "apology" to you. You will be a long time waiting.
You invent a story from your own mind of which every detail has been ridiculed. You said there was published evidence yet you can’t find anything to substantiate it.
This is different from from saying there are suspicions.
Apologise for saying that Alan Simpson said he took drugs.
You invent a story from your own mind of which every detail has been ridiculed. You said there was published evidence yet you can’t find anything to substantiate it.
This is different from from saying there are suspicions.
Apologise for saying that Alan Simpson said he took drugs.
Fine women too. Tuohy is the most likely currently.
You are entitled to your opinion - ill-informed as it is. However, liar soorer will no doubt demand an apology from you. Or maybe he is only concerned about a "fine old gentleman in a Yorkshire nursing home".