The notion of Boise schools running at altitude and that seriously impacting them is a joke. You're talking about maybe 4 seconds over 3200m, and probably less. Landon Heemeyer solo'd a 9:03 in Boise and then ran 8:59 in a race in Portland where he got dusted over the last lap.
The bigger factor for the Boise schools is that they get not windy weather and better fields when they venture to Oregon and California. Now Pocatello, Idaho Falls, Blackfoot, etc., they deal with a lot more wind, significantly weaker fields, and ~4500'+ of elevation.
Herriman is scary. If it was Rocky Mountain, one of the darlings of this site, that had these times, everyone would be saying they are a clear favorite for the title.
Herriman's 9th would be Rocky's number 3 returner.
Scoring through 7 would go Rocky, Rocky, Herriman, Herriman, Herriman, Herriman, Herriman, Herriman, Herriman, Herriman, Rocky, Rocky, Rocky, Rocky, Rocky. The scoring would be 25 to 36. The team average times would be 9:26.4 vs 9:38.8.
Herriman is scary. If it was Rocky Mountain, one of the darlings of this site, that had these times, everyone would be saying they are a clear favorite for the title.
Herriman's 9th would be Rocky's number 3 returner.
Scoring through 7 would go Rocky, Rocky, Herriman, Herriman, Herriman, Herriman, Herriman, Herriman, Herriman, Herriman, Rocky, Rocky, Rocky, Rocky, Rocky. The scoring would be 25 to 36. The team average times would be 9:26.4 vs 9:38.8.
Nobody was implying that Rocky Mountain will be winning NXN. Especially not over Herriman.
I was pointing out that schools within the Northwest and Southwest that run at altitude are generally better than their times reflect. THIS INCLUDES HERRIMAN.
American Fork top 5 nonseniors Simmons - 8:34 (will win the title so he will get the 1 point) Jaster - 9:14 Evans - 9:21 Bradshaw - 9:21 Pack - 9:29 (but had a rough start to the track season but was #2 on the team at NXN) Orr - 9:45 Moore - 9:56 I think that AF has a solid top 4, and will be solid through 5 if Pack is healthy and on his A-game at NXN. But the problem is, if any of their top 5 has an off day, their whole team will have an off day if no one else steps up. It would be helpful if they develop a 6 and 7 over the summer.
The thing about Ventura is that they are really good, but they only have a top 5 (just like American Fork), that happen to be worse than AF. Ventura is like a beta version of American Fork.
AF has one low stick in Danny Simmons, who will most likely win NXN, but Ventura has two in Anthony Fast Horse (4:08/8:51) and Micah Grossman (4:09/9:01). They also have a stud freshman who has run 4:30 and possibly could step up next year
I would also not count out Great Oak. they weren’t expected to even make it nxn last year and they got 6th
Actually, at the beginning of last season, they were expected to make it (they got 7th at RL 2021 and returned most of their varsity).
I think I remember hearing somewhere that in the middle of XC 2022 there were guys sick
Firman was also flukey. They were the chute next to Rocky Mountain and two over from the middle barrier. Rocky cut over quickly and Great Oak got shot out the back.
Firman was also flukey. They were the chute next to Rocky Mountain and two over from the middle barrier. Rocky cut over quickly and Great Oak got shot out the back.
Mostly true. If you take a look at the splits, all of Great Oak's scorers got out at around 2:40 for the k, which was only around 6 seconds back from the top pack.
Saying they got "Shot out the back" makes it sound like it was impossible for them to move after the start, but that doesn't seem to be the
1k is plenty of time for runners to work back up. Great Oak was at the back of the middle section rounding the first bend, which is about 200 meters in. Also, 6 seconds is the difference between 20th and like 60th. That’s a lot of bodies to have to move around the rest of the race. Boise was the team against the middle barrier and they were also had a terrible start.