2022 FIFA World Cup Thread

richie scissor wrote:

Cartier-Bresson wrote:

FIFA, we're still waiting for the pictures.

If you're referring to Japan's 2nd goal, it's easy to see how that would not be ruled out of play.

Cartier-Bresson wrote:

post nups wrote:

I’m what world was the play leading up to Davies’ goal offsides? If there was any conspiracy for Alphonso, he would’ve certainly had a second penalty against Belgium.

It seems to be you that has an agenda based on your subsequent paragraph.

Take a look at the actual match, Bruv.

Or maybe see an ophthalmologist.

Got no agenda, just watching what I see on TV. Tanaka's "goal" an even bigger joke.

Davies is hype.

Congratulations on your nuptials.

Laryea Offside Canada v Croatia

Cartier-Bresson wrote:

richie scissor wrote:

If you're referring to Japan's 2nd goal, it's easy to see how that would not be ruled out of play.

It's not, actually. The ball is still moving. Japanese player has yet to make contact.

Just show us the video/photos they used to reverse the ref's decision.

Not real complicated.

Yet more weirdness from this World Cup and it's not even half over.

richie scissor wrote:

Cartier-Bresson wrote:

It's not, actually. The ball is still moving. Japanese player has yet to make contact.

Just show us the video/photos they used to reverse the ref's decision.

Not real complicated.

Yet more weirdness from this World Cup and it's not even half over.

How would I have the exact videos/photos that the refs used? It's easy to see how it could have been in play, and at the very least not reason to overturn.

Image:pbs.twimg.com/media/Fi68VPtXoAACCi4?fo...

Show me an image that proves it's clearly out of play. The onus is on you.

richie scissor wrote:

Cartier-Bresson wrote:

It's not, actually. The ball is still moving. Japanese player has yet to make contact.

Just show us the video/photos they used to reverse the ref's decision.

Not real complicated.

Yet more weirdness from this World Cup and it's not even half over.

How would I have the exact videos/photos that the refs used? It's easy to see how it could have been in play, and at the very least not reason to overturn.

Image:pbs.twimg.com/media/Fi68VPtXoAACCi4?fo...

Show me an image that proves it's clearly out of play. The onus is on you.

richie scissor wrote:

Cartier-Bresson wrote:

It's not, actually. The ball is still moving. Japanese player has yet to make contact.

Just show us the video/photos they used to reverse the ref's decision.

Not real complicated.

Yet more weirdness from this World Cup and it's not even half over.

How would I have the exact videos/photos that the refs used? It's easy to see how it could have been in play, and at the very least not reason to overturn.

Image:pbs.twimg.com/media/Fi68VPtXoAACCi4?fo...

Show me an image that proves it's clearly out of play. The onus is on you.

Cartier-Bresson wrote:

richie scissor wrote:

How would I have the exact videos/photos that the refs used? It's easy to see how it could have been in play, and at the very least not reason to overturn.

Image:pbs.twimg.com/media/Fi68VPtXoAACCi4?fo...

Show me an image that proves it's clearly out of play. The onus is on you.

Hardly.

The onus is on FIFA.

Duh.

Ben Wah wrote:

richie scissor wrote:

How would I have the exact videos/photos that the refs used? It's easy to see how it could have been in play, and at the very least not reason to overturn.

Image:pbs.twimg.com/media/Fi68VPtXoAACCi4?fo...

Show me an image that proves it's clearly out of play. The onus is on you.

I think if it were ruled initially out of play it would've been hard to reverse the call just as it was to uphold it.

Tweet:twitter.com/GNev2/status/1598409336388...

richie scissor wrote:

Cartier-Bresson wrote:

Hardly.

The onus is on FIFA.

Duh.

How can you be so certain that it is wrong if you can't provide anything showing as much?

post nups wrote:

Cartier-Bresson wrote:

Take a look at the actual match, Bruv.

Or maybe see an ophthalmologist.

Got no agenda, just watching what I see on TV. Tanaka's "goal" an even bigger joke.

Davies is hype.

Congratulations on your nuptials.

Laryea Offside Canada v Croatia

I watched the whole match and your link is not loading anything, which is sad because I’m starting to laugh at you if you are telling me Laryea was offsides on Davies’ goal. I’m guessing you will realize this.

Cartier-Bresson wrote:

richie scissor wrote:

How can you be so certain that it is wrong if you can't provide anything showing as much?

You just do not get it.

FIFA has not released the photo evidence that led them to reverse the call. Show me the next few frames after the photo in your post, Mr Onus. You know, the ones where the ball is magically going the other way.

You can't because FIFA won't let you.

Why is that so difficult to understand?

Kingrey wrote:

The World Cup is very even now days. The rest of the world has caught up to the European countries for the most part. There are probably only 2 or 3 who are still above the rest of the world. France, Brazil and maybe Portugal come to mind.

- Germany eliminated in group play

- Argentina barely made it through

- Morocco wins their group

- England can’t win vs the USA

The US has a very good chance to beat the Netherlands and beyond. The rest of the world isn’t that good anymore. Any country can be beat these days. US could very well make it to the semis. France is still the team to beat.

post nups wrote:

Cartier-Bresson wrote:

Take a look at the actual match, Bruv.

Or maybe see an ophthalmologist.

Got no agenda, just watching what I see on TV. Tanaka's "goal" an even bigger joke.

Davies is hype.

Congratulations on your nuptials.

Laryea Offside Canada v Croatia

I watched the whole match and your link is not loading anything, which is sad because I’m starting to laugh at you if you are telling me Laryea was offsides on Davies’ goal. I’m guessing you will realize this.

richie scissor wrote:

Ben Wah wrote:

I think if it were ruled initially out of play it would've been hard to reverse the call just as it was to uphold it.

Tweet:twitter.com/GNev2/status/1598409336388...

Do you believe that image shows it to be out of play?

richie scissor wrote:

Cartier-Bresson wrote:

You just do not get it.

FIFA has not released the photo evidence that led them to reverse the call. Show me the next few frames after the photo in your post, Mr Onus. You know, the ones where the ball is magically going the other way.

You can't because FIFA won't let you.

Why is that so difficult to understand?

You're sure it's out of play without anything to show as much. Brilliant criticism!

Cartier-Bresson wrote:

post nups wrote:

I watched the whole match and your link is not loading anything, which is sad because I’m starting to laugh at you if you are telling me Laryea was offsides on Davies’ goal. I’m guessing you will realize this.

You won't be laughing when your urologist tells you you blew your load too much on your honeymoon.

Try this

Ben Wah wrote:

richie scissor wrote:

Do you believe that image shows it to be out of play?

I think it's inconclusive. The point is if they ruled out I don't think the other view is conclusive enough to overturn that. There's no real close up shot over the overhead image.