These are not examples of a medical procedure that cannot be reversed. When a person takes an injection of a chemical and biological formulation, that formulation will stay in their body and there is no option for removal. You cannot be reverse vaccinated.
You. Again. Jesus every time you come here you get proven wrong. Again and again. For every person who dies BECAUSE of a covid vaccine, there are literally hundreds of millions who don't.
The overwhelming majority of those hundreds of millions never needed the so-called "vaccines" in the first place. I have taken ZERO of those shots. I was infected with omicron in January. 2 days of mild flu-like symptoms followed by 10 days of a gradually clearing head cold. My outcome was identical to people who had 1, 2, 3, or 4 shots.
Pfizer, Moderna, J&J, AZ. All of them and more are in on the biggest scam in history.
How about we allow people to receive compensation for organ donations? Every single other person involved in the procedure makes tremendous amounts of money. The organ shortage would be ended overnight if the government moved out of the way with their arcane regulations against selling organs.
If people could be compensation, we wouldn’t be reliant on family members to do the altruistic thing, which really isn’t altruistic when you consider they are just trying to ensure their genetics continue to survive.
So, when you are barred from eating at a restaurant because you don't have shoes on, and they have a "no shirt, no shoes" policy the restaurant is stopping you from eating right?
When you show up to a stadium to watch a basketball game, and they say "sorry no bags unless they are clear bags" but you brought your back pack with you, the Arena is stopping you from watching the game?
When you go grocery shopping and you want a tube of toothpaste, but you don't have any money the store stopping you from maintaining oral health?
These are not examples of a medical procedure that cannot be reversed. When a person takes an injection of a chemical and biological formulation, that formulation will stay in their body and there is no option for removal. You cannot be reverse vaccinated.
Try again.
If your case was about immune selection then I would agree. You cannot revert all your T and B cells to naive...
But most chemical and biological materials get cleared/degraded over time below the point of activity.. In fact every drug you've ever taken has a well established biological half life! Furthermore your claim could easily apply to anything you eat or drink too? It's just nonsense.
These are not examples of a medical procedure that cannot be reversed. When a person takes an injection of a chemical and biological formulation, that formulation will stay in their body and there is no option for removal. You cannot be reverse vaccinated.
Try again.
If your case was about immune selection then I would agree. You cannot revert all your T and B cells to naive...
But most chemical and biological materials get cleared/degraded over time below the point of activity.. In fact every drug you've ever taken has a well established biological half life! Furthermore your claim could easily apply to anything you eat or drink too? It's just nonsense.
An expert on the long term effects of mRNA trace amounts. Impressive considering the shots have been around for less than 16 months.
There is no good reason why someone should need to get a vaccine before giving a kidney if they don’t want to. Inform them of the risks, then proceed.
This should actually be a great example where anti-vaxxers would re-think their beliefs and admit how wrong they have been. But, instead, they just amplify their stupidity.
How about we just start with - who did the research and determined that kidney transplants were safe? How many people suffer complications after a kidney transplant? Why must kidney transplant patients take so many different drugs (hello big pharma) every day to stay alive.
How about just any surgery and the anesthesia? Who did that research? Who thinks that's safe? What complications occur from that? What big pharma companies are involved in that process and developed those drugs?
But no - you don't question all the background research for a transplant and surgery etc., the huge risks involved, all the endless drugs required during and that must be taken forever after - that's all ok, no problem there, but you've "done the research" and vaccines are bad and you are in a better position than the doctor to determine if you need to take that.
If the patient can decide about being vaccinated, what about anesthesia, can they decide which anesthetic they want and how much, maybe none at all? What about all the immunosuppressive drugs after - can they tell the doctor they won't agree to take any of them? Should the doctor be required to give the surgery even though they know the patient will refuse to follow medical advice and take immunosuppressive drugs for the rest of their lives so they will likely die after the surgery? Why not?
Nope - you all know so much more than the doctors and scientists, why not just do the kidney transplant yourselves? Why rely on a doctor at all. Why doesn't this dad just perform the surgery himself with his own medical knowledge.
Idiots.
(A) First successful kidney transplant: 1954
(B) First human clinical trials using mRNA against an infectious agent (rabies): 2013.
Idiots can perform simple calculations. (A) 68 years ago, (B) 9 years ago.