Apparently a 3:34-3:35 runner produced the fastest 200m split ever in a 1500m.
That is impressive in and of itself, whether the first 1200 was 2:54 or 3:24 or 2:24 or 3:54.
So it is just as impressive if it came off 3.54 than if it was off 2.54? I guess it depends on whether you think a 1500 is a race over the full distance and not just the last 200. Let's see if he is better than 3.34-35.
I wouldn't/didn't say "just as", but I would/did say "impressive regardless".
How can the fastest 200m split ever in an elite 1500m national championship race not be impressive?
Silence. He has nothing to offer on the subject of thread and indeed wouldn't know what it is.
Yapping puppies recognise racists and can warn people to ignore you as you won’t accept medical textbooks nor science.
So you still haven't identified the subject of the thread. Nothing from you on that subject. You also continue to fail your own advice to ignore me. You find it impossible. Do you want my autograph?
So it is just as impressive if it came off 3.54 than if it was off 2.54? I guess it depends on whether you think a 1500 is a race over the full distance and not just the last 200. Let's see if he is better than 3.34-35.
I wouldn't/didn't say "just as", but I would/did say "impressive regardless".
How can the fastest 200m split ever in an elite 1500m national championship race not be impressive?
When it is effectively a 200m race and not 1500. Call me when he beats 3.30.
motivation for take away: https://www.instagram.com/robertfarken/?hl=deAfter a painful end of the 23 summer season I managed to stay healthy through the wint...
The national indoor champs will be exciting, he against Bartelsmeyer and Probst
Man, his tattooed arm looks really cool 🤢
We get it, everyone over 50 on letsrun hates tattoos. Why do we have to see the same comments over and over. This is letsrun not letstattoo. Let people live jfc