Wait what's being suppressed here? Remdesivir for example is used fairly extensively in treating COVID patients. Also, I'm not sure I follow how "the left" is wrong about anything here... are you saying that "the left" doesn't think drug therapies are legitimate?
Yeah, this aspect really bothered me and kinda soured me on the vaccines. I lost a lot of trust for institutions through all this, and it makes me very sad.
Wait what's being suppressed here? Remdesivir for example is used fairly extensively in treating COVID patients. Also, I'm not sure I follow how "the left" is wrong about anything here... are you saying that "the left" doesn't think drug therapies are legitimate?
Remdesivir was complete failure put forth as a straw man by Pharma. Fluvoximine, zinc,Vitamin D3/K2 and most of all Ivermectin have been extremely effective in countries that were spared the Pharma Death Grip. This is one of the biggest war crimes in history, tens of thousands, maybe more died early and miserable deaths for corporate profit.
Wait what's being suppressed here? Remdesivir for example is used fairly extensively in treating COVID patients. Also, I'm not sure I follow how "the left" is wrong about anything here... are you saying that "the left" doesn't think drug therapies are legitimate?
Remdesivir was complete failure put forth as a straw man by Pharma. Fluvoximine, zinc,Vitamin D3/K2 and most of all Ivermectin have been extremely effective in countries that were spared the Pharma Death Grip. This is one of the biggest war crimes in history, tens of thousands, maybe more died early and miserable deaths for corporate profit.
Yes exactly. People don't comprehend the corporate greed and its pull. Enough money can accomplish any agenda, no matter how sick and twisted. They slander any silence any competition or opposing narrative. The sheep don't even realize what's going on because they're either too ignorant, scared, gullible, lazy, benefitting from covid histeria or flat-out dumb.
If these 1435 studies were published, how can you say they were suppressed?
Because they are Russian/GQP trolls and don't care about facts.
There is nobody that doesn't know about any of this and most of that sht doesn't work, at least to the extent it will cure or prevent covid-19. The fools prescribing IVM are running online teleheath scams pocketing $$ for the "exam" and referring you to their buddies pharmacy for overpriced IVM.... that doesn;t do sht.
Tens of thousands of people in the US have died because they refused to get vaccinated.
If these 1435 studies were published, how can you say they were suppressed?
Because they are Russian/GQP trolls and don't care about facts.
There is nobody that doesn't know about any of this and most of that sht doesn't work, at least to the extent it will cure or prevent covid-19. The fools prescribing IVM are running online teleheath scams pocketing $ for the "exam" and referring you to their buddies pharmacy for overpriced IVM.... that doesn;t do sht.
Tens of thousands of people in the US have died because they refused to get vaccinated.
And you don't think big pharmas prescribing of their vaccines is to pocket money and help the pharma industry thrive? Your post is kind of ironic. The government and even big pharma create the problem and they also create the "solution." The fact you can't see this is the reason why their BS is enabled to run roughshod all over hell and back. You are their prototypical prey.
If you take crappy, poorly controlled studies (that are often just straight-up fraud) and combine them by cherry picking only positive numbers, you can get an eye popping p-value and effect size that is total garbage. This has always been true. Scientists know this. Doctors know this. Some armchair experts are now discovering this.
If these 1435 studies were published, how can you say they were suppressed?
Most people aren't reading scientific journals. The media and big tech are the ones suppressing.
There's a reason this stuff doesn't make it out of the primary lit. They are garbage studies that, at best, suggests the need for larger, better controlled studies. THOSE are the studies that make it into the popular media... if they are positive. They never are, because 99% of these drugs don't work. And that's OK! It was worth a try, but smart people moved on years ago, literally.
Wait what's being suppressed here? Remdesivir for example is used fairly extensively in treating COVID patients. Also, I'm not sure I follow how "the left" is wrong about anything here... are you saying that "the left" doesn't think drug therapies are legitimate?
The point that everyone has missed so far is that Remdesivir is NOT an early treatment. Remdesivir is only used AFTER the patient has been sent home and told to come back if it got worst. Only when covid gets worse and the patient is hospitalized is Remdesivir used. As such, it's not early stage. By the time Remdesivir is authorized for use, the patient has already moved into the cytokine storm stage of the disease. Here's the protocol straight from the covid treatment guidelines at the NIH.
Intravenous remdesivir is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of COVID-19 in hospitalized adult and pediatric patients (aged ≥12 years and weighing ≥40 kg)
If these 1435 studies were published, how can you say they were suppressed?
Most people aren't reading scientific journals. The media and big tech are the ones suppressing.
You can speak for yourself -- I don't get my information from media and big tech.
What is c19early.com if it isn't media? Who is behind c19early.com? Big Pharma?
People who read that website still don't read the scientific journals, so are unable to judge the quality of the conclusions, or even know what the conclusions were, and for whom the conclusions apply, and yet are convinced that the conclusion of a website that lacks "about us" information is the unbiased truth, and that "media and big tech" are lying.
I read someone picked apart the many studies behind the many Ivermectin info-mercial websites, finding most of the studies to be of poor quality and with fundamental flaws, with the better ones simply concluding that it helps victims in countries with worms recover a couple days faster, or unremarkably, that worms delay recovery, so treating the worms helps.
