I agree! Also those behind school vaccine mandates that have been around since the 60s! and the vaccine requirements for entry to US on non-tourist Visas...! great idea!
You mean the school mandates that were easily avoided with religious exemptions? Compared to unavoidable mandates linked to employment?
Oh, and like the people who push "vaccine" mandates on citizens care ever cared about the requirements for legal entry to the USA, when the border is wide open and the illegals come by the millions, not only unvaxxed, but carrying all sorts of diseases. Utter hypocrites.
I was fine w a school closure mandate while we were still trying to figure out how to control and treat it, but that was pretty much settled by October of 2020 and certainly by February of 2021 when all high risk people had the opportunity to get vaccinated. School aged children were never the demographic we should’ve been focusing on.
You make a good point about illegal immigration, but you left out the most glaring part of all. They have smuggled in enough fentanyl to kill every single US citizen, using precursor chemicals from China. I heard somebody comparing it to Anthrax, and, as such, this should be a war on terror, marshaling far more assets than we do to fight it. But, apparently senior lives north of 75 matter more than college kids aged 22 who are inadvertently taking laced substances. And votes.
But if you test for something that shouldn't be there at all AND you find a tiny amount, isn't that a point of concern? Shouldn't the level be 0 pg/ml? Is the vaccine just floating around in the air? How did it get into a milk sample? Why does it disappear after 48 hours? Look at this time line.
Day T0: mRNA not there
T1: mRNA detected
T2: mRNA detected
T3 and beyond: mRNA not detected.
I don't think the contamination hypothesis holds water... or in this case, milk. :)
Let me add that I'm not arguing that I'm right and you're wrong. I'm not a scientist... and we don't know that this represents a danger. I just don't understand how mRNA that we're told does not leave the vicinity of the injection site could get into breast milk.
The point is it does migrate. There are no valid, robust pharmacokinetic studies to say otherwise, nor does anyone really know what it means.
But the more important part that keeps being glossed over is that these mRNA jabs fail to elicit a secretory IgA response in the mucosa, which is exactly what you would want to stop, not just diminish, but stop the spread and eradicate the virus. A nasal vaccine.
We have a “data analyst” on here producing one non-peer reviewed, not very well-controlled paper that says the jab reduces relative transmission compared to natural immunity. Not stops it, just reduces it, and he believes that that one myopic, non-peer reviewed study allows him to “declare victory.” So compelling and scientific. Not to mention, it fails to look at T cell & B cell morphology in totality.
At least 2600bro has some credibility. If you want to get the vaccine, be my guest. It makes sense in certain high risk demographics. I personally would take a nasal vaccine. I won’t touch these new, bivalent boosters. There are no compelling and robust data, not yet anyway. Just watch Offit’s clip above.
What? The original papers showed tissue distribution. Fisky man you gotta stop. You’re looking for conspiracies.
In this paper they use RT-qPCR which is an extremely sensitive method for detecting RNA. Labs have had blood vials break in a centrifuge and coffee cups 4 rooms away have tested positive via qPCR for viruses in the blood.
They even state: The vaccine detection limit was 1 pg/mL of EBM. Remember, a vaccine contains 10-30 micrograms of mRNA so this study detects a positive if 1/10,000,000th of the mRNA in the vaccine makes it into a mL of breast milk.
But if you test for something that shouldn't be there at all AND you find a tiny amount, isn't that a point of concern? Shouldn't the level be 0 pg/ml? Is the vaccine just floating around in the air? How did it get into a milk sample? Why does it disappear after 48 hours? Look at this time line.
Day T0: mRNA not there
T1: mRNA detected
T2: mRNA detected
T3 and beyond: mRNA not detected.
I don't think the contamination hypothesis holds water... or in this case, milk. :)
Anything you inject into your body will be found at some low level (e.g. 0.1 ppm) throughout the body, we have a circulatory system after all. A little mRNA making its way to the milk ducts in a woman is not a surprise.
You mean the school mandates that were easily avoided with religious exemptions? Compared to unavoidable mandates linked to employment?
Oh, and like the people who push "vaccine" mandates on citizens care ever cared about the requirements for legal entry to the USA, when the border is wide open and the illegals come by the millions, not only unvaxxed, but carrying all sorts of diseases. Utter hypocrites.
I was fine w a school closure mandate while we were still trying to figure out how to control and treat it, but that was pretty much settled by October of 2020 and certainly by February of 2021 when all high risk people had the opportunity to get vaccinated. School aged children were never the demographic we should’ve been focusing on.
You make a good point about illegal immigration, but you left out the most glaring part of all. They have smuggled in enough fentanyl to kill every single US citizen, using precursor chemicals from China. I heard somebody comparing it to Anthrax, and, as such, this should be a war on terror, marshaling far more assets than we do to fight it. But, apparently senior lives north of 75 matter more than college kids aged 22 who are inadvertently taking laced substances. And votes.
Schools shouldn’t have been closed fall/winter of 2020/2021 - a terrible policy failure - and we should do a lot more to get opiates off the streets. No arguments from me there.
We have a “data analyst” on here producing one non-peer reviewed, not very well-controlled paper that says the jab reduces relative transmission compared to natural immunity. Not stops it, just reduces it, and he believes that that one myopic, non-peer reviewed study allows him to “declare victory.” So compelling and scientific. Not to mention, it fails to look at T cell & B cell morphology in totality.
The iconic: "If something is not 100% effective, it doesn't work" standard that antivaxxers recently invented because they were so mad vaccines worked as well as they do. Imagine if they applied that standard to their vaunted IVM+zinc+rabbit's foot+prayer+full moon regimens, lol.
The fact is that the vaccine does reduce Omicron transmission. Effect size isn't gigantic, but taking a chunk out of exponential growth leads to millions of prevented cases down the line.
This is, of course, on top of the outstanding efficacy against severe disease that has never been in doubt.
This was the first study to look at vaccinated transmission with Omicron. Happy to see evidence that the vaccine doesn't prevent transmission.
The point is it does migrate. There are no valid, robust pharmacokinetic studies to say otherwise, nor does anyone really know what it means.
This is true of anything you eat, inject, breathe, and touch. Some small traces of it find their way around your whole body.
Even Mrs. Covidiocy ends up with a little bit of covidiot DNA circulating after you two canoodle. Do we know what it means....? No. Are exceedingly trace amounts of common biological material cause for concern? No.
The point is it does migrate. There are no valid, robust pharmacokinetic studies to say otherwise, nor does anyone really know what it means.
This is true of anything you eat, inject, breathe, and touch. Some small traces of it find their way around your whole body.
Even Mrs. Covidiocy ends up with a little bit of covidiot DNA circulating after you two canoodle. Do we know what it means....? No. Are exceedingly trace amounts of common biological material cause for concern? No.
Did you can find THALLIUM - the most deadly heavy metal - in virtually every single plant? No one can say how deadly eating plants might be, only sheep would continue to eat plants!
"...One of the strongest things here is the rechallenge we know about medications There is the Naranjo Scale (The Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) probability scale): When there is an adverse event that re
An Israeli journalist by the name of Yaffa Shir-Raz obtained video footage that was supposed to remain private, showing Israeli researchers discussing known adverse events associated with covid “vaccines.”
In the video, the researchers are heard calling out the Pfizer injection by name, as the company’s mRNA (messenger RNA) injection was administered exclusive of all others in Israel.
The Israeli Ministry of Health (MoH) commissioned the investigation and later held a meeting about it to discuss. That meeting happened virtually this past June, the video footage of which was supposed to remain an internal affair.
The video was leaked, however, revealing that the Israeli government has known for several months now – and likely even long before – that Fauci Flu shots are deadly. (Related: Israel is the same country that called for endless covid booster shots to be taken annually like flu shots.)
According to the researchers, a phenomenon known as rechallenge was observed, meaning adverse events reoccurred or worsened following injection with additional doses or “boosts” of the covid vaccination.
The Journal of Insulin Resistance is a peer-reviewed, clinically oriented journal covering advances in disorders of insulin resistance. Articles focus on clinical care and advancing therapy for patients with insulin resistanc...
Dr. Anthony Fauci and his wife’s net worth grew by $5 million during the COVID-19 pandemic as thousands of US residents struggled financially, according to a government spending watchdog group.
The combined wealth of the 81-year-old retiring director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and his bioethicist wife, Christine Grady, soared from $7.5 million in 2019 to $12.6 million at the end of 2021, according to a report from the non-profit OpenTheBooks.
All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version). To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected artic...
Dr. Marik is the 2nd most published person in the world in critical care medicine. His H-Index is 105. Most Nobel prize laureates have an H-index of 40.
My friends who believe the vaccine are safe have told me they would reconsider their position if any of their doctors came out against the vaccine. I told them that doctors are afraid to speak out bec
Here is my interview with Dr. Marik on the subject where he describes how he was personally retaliated by the medical community after he discovered early treatment work and the vaccines are unsafe. It’s really stunning. They actually had to fabricate patients who don’t exist.
Note also that Dr. Marik was a believer in the COVID vaccine; he took it just like he was told. It took him months looking at the evidence before he changed his mind. I asked him in the interview, “Now that you realize the vaccines are not safe, could you have gotten it wrong this time?” He said, “No, the evidence is very clear.”
He regrets not having done his homework and trusting others when he took the shot.
It was only after he looked at the data directly himself, he said the data was crystal clear. When he started speaking out, he was retaliated against by the medical community.
Yes while people and children struggled, lost their business/jobs, Fraudchi was profiting at their expense as were all the other who benefitted from the pandemic. Sickening really, pun intended. If he really cared he would donate his profits to those people. Nope. Never. Lot of collateral damage still unfolding, not to even mention the vaccine deaths/ailments that will follow (watch for a huge spike in cancers too). They'll have the same old song and dance though, saying "you can't prove it was the vaccine. Go get your bi-annual booster if you want to keep your job and rights." Wake up people.
Death rates are calculated as the number of deaths in each group, divided by the total number of people in this group. This is given per 100,000 people.
If you have decided to not get vaccinated against COVID-19, a new data analysis from The Associated Press concludes you may have a higher risk of dying compared to those who have chosen to be vaccinated. The analysis was rele...
Dan M still struggles with the idea that things can change, a common malady among boomers. He fails to dispute that the unvaccinated are dying a 10X higher rate than the vaccinated.
