Another day, another corrupt deal between government officials and pharmaceutical executives. The global establishment doing what it does best. Try to scare us with the latest Covid "variant" while in the background, they engage in their standard modus operandi of graft and palm greasing. What else is new.
-
74
-
fisky wrote:
Steve Kirsche has commissioned three surveys since June 25. Participants were selected randomly and the poll was conducted by a professional polling company. 1.5% of respondents reported that they were disabled to the point that they could not work due to the vaccine. (Of course, surveys like this are subject to what I call the YELP effect with a higher percentage of people with negative experiences being motivated to fill out the survey. Still, it provides a ballpark number to begin the discussion.) (A link follows that contains a link to all three surveys.)
If you extrapolate this 1.5% to the vaxxed population, it would be about 3.7M newly disabled people. The US Bureau of Labor Statistics data confirms this disability increase. (See second link) From 2011 to 2016, disability claims increased about 500k/year. From 2017 to Dec 2020, claims were flat. Beginning January 2021, disability claims stood at 29.8M. In June 2022, claims were 32.9M. That's 3.1M since vaccines began and an annualized rate of >2M per year... far more than any previous 1.5 year increase in history. I suppose some of this increase could be attributed to "noise" in the data fluctuations, but even a casual glance at the chart below shows a dramatic and non-random increase.
Surely it's the vaccine and not the 100M+ COVID infections that might be driving disability causes.
But in reality it's likely, COVID-data-reporting backlog, aging population, change in definitions?
32 -
Steve Kirsch is a dogmatic troll who twists and contorts data to fit his extremely narrow goal.
14 -
3 doses (still) work excellently at preventing severe disease and death from Omicron.
14 -
not real data wrote:
fisky wrote:
Steve Kirsche has commissioned three surveys since June 25. Participants were selected randomly and the poll was conducted by a professional polling company. 1.5% of respondents reported that they were disabled to the point that they could not work due to the vaccine. (Of course, surveys like this are subject to what I call the YELP effect with a higher percentage of people with negative experiences being motivated to fill out the survey. Still, it provides a ballpark number to begin the discussion.) (A link follows that contains a link to all three surveys.)
If you extrapolate this 1.5% to the vaxxed population, it would be about 3.7M newly disabled people. The US Bureau of Labor Statistics data confirms this disability increase. (See second link) From 2011 to 2016, disability claims increased about 500k/year. From 2017 to Dec 2020, claims were flat. Beginning January 2021, disability claims stood at 29.8M. In June 2022, claims were 32.9M. That's 3.1M since vaccines began and an annualized rate of >2M per year... far more than any previous 1.5 year increase in history. I suppose some of this increase could be attributed to "noise" in the data fluctuations, but even a casual glance at the chart below shows a dramatic and non-random increase.
Surely it's the vaccine and not the 100M+ COVID infections that might be driving disability causes.
But in reality it's likely, COVID-data-reporting backlog, aging population, change in definitions?
Thanks for bumping this back to the top so more runners will see it. Let's address your rationalizations. The BLS has reported disability claim data for years. It's a government program and easy to track. The BLS FRED data shows that disability claims rose about 0.5M/year for the past decade or so. Then, starting immediately with the the date of the vaccine rollout, disability claims spiked upwards dramatically and as more working adults got vaccinated, disability claims continued to rise.... 3.1M new claims since Jan 2021. A backlog might have accounted for 6 months or so of rise, but not for 18 months. Plus, the rate of increase is 2M/year. In the past, the rate of increase was only 0.5M/year. The workforce did not suddenly get older on Jan 1, 2021. There has been no change in definitions of disability or applications policy, to my knowledge.
Since only 60-65% of adults are in the workforce, that extrapolates to 5M adult disabilities in the total adult population since the vaccine rollout.
And regarding your second post, "When you can't rebut the message, attack the messenger." Note that Kirsch sites research and articles by others on this unprecedented rise in disability claims. In fact, the person who posted the FRED data originally wasn't Kirsch. It was another substack poster.
In short, in spite of lack of transparency by the CDC, Fauci, and Pfizer, they can't hide all the data. All they can do is refuse to acknowledge it.
Here's another link to Kirsch's substack. He lists 70+ reasons to be skeptical of the "safe and effective" mantra. Ask yourself, "How many of these 70+ concerns would have to be valid before I would get boosted? How many would have to be valid before I allowed my 0.5 to 5 year old to get vaccinated?"
Would all 70+ have to be true about the vaccine's adverse effects before it would change your opinion of whether to get vaccinated or boosted now? Of course not. How about 35? 10? 2?
How bad would the risk of disability have to be before you wouldn't consider getting your next booster? 1 in a million? 1 in 100,000? 1 in 100?
I strongly suggest that everyone reading this set aside confirmation bias and look at Kirsch's list. It is mind-boggling and horrific... 400% increase in demand for caskets for young people. Two insurance companies reporting unprecedented rise in life insurance claims. The rise of "sudden adult death syndrome." It's 70+ concerns... read them.
Then, pick several points that concern you and read the links in those concerns. Then, read the links in those links. The disability concern is currently point #12 on the list below.
Do not fall for the trick of attacking the messenger. Read this list.
83 -
Not effective.
Not safe.
62 -
Many real doctors and scientists know the truth. Here's another one.
"Emergency admissions & deaths are higher among the vaccinated."
"Follow the evidence..."
112 -
The fear mongering continues.
123 -
fisky wrote:
Steve Kirsch has reported the results of additional random surveys conducted by a professional third party polling company. Rather than present his summary, here are some key results from the poll itself. Note that polls suffer from the YELP effect... negative and very positive experiences are more likely to be reported.
Question 1 (Q1) Are you vaxxed? 25% no 31% 3 or more times
Q3: Injured from vaxx? Yes 9.38%
If yes, do injury result in hospital stay? Yes 61%
Q11 and Q12: How serious was your injury? Multiple choice on Q12. 2 reported that they could not work. 4 reported that they could not work a full day. 6 felt the injury would shorten their lifespan.
Q22: Did members of your household (HH) die from vaxx? Yes 8.62%
Q24: Did members of your HH die from covid? Yes 9.14%
Q25: Did member who died get at least one vaxx? Yes 66%
Q25: Did member who died get Remdesivir? Yes 28%
Q30: Will you get vaxxed in the future? Yes 47%
Here is my top takeaway from this survey.
Deaths from the vaccine and from covid are reported at higher than actual rates due to the YELP effect, but the ratio is important. Note that vaxx deaths and covid deaths are about equal. This data is similar to Kirsch's previous surveys. To me, this indicates that deaths from the vaccine are more common than the official reports.
Died with Covid - average age > average life expectancy
Died from Vaxx - average age = what?
Covid kills the nearly dead.
Vaxx kills the young and healthy.
82 -
113
-
32
-
If he sneaks over the Southern border with the Mexicans, then no problem. The USA will welcome him with open arms.
62 -
I got a cold in mid-December, it was probably Omicron. Haven't caught anything cold-like or flu-like since.
I remain happily unvaxxed, no flu shot ever and my natural immunity remains undefeated.
83 -
41
-
So, it WAS a plandemic. Arrest Fraudci.
61 -
At this point, the establishment is desperately clutching pharmaceutical straws. Pathetic and lame.
*******
"Measurements of vaccine effectiveness have been complicated by the number of unvaccinated people who have been infected by the virus, especially during the wintertime surge of Omicron cases."
"Those prior infections give people some protection against Covid. As a result, in studies like the C.D.C.’s that compare outcomes from the virus in vaccinated and unvaccinated people, the vaccines appear less protective than they really are."
02 -
DanM wrote:
At this point, the establishment is desperately clutching pharmaceutical straws. Pathetic and lame.
*******
"Measurements of vaccine effectiveness have been complicated by the number of unvaccinated people who have been infected by the virus, especially during the wintertime surge of Omicron cases."
"Those prior infections give people some protection against Covid. As a result, in studies like the C.D.C.’s that compare outcomes from the virus in vaccinated and unvaccinated people, the vaccines appear less protective than they really are."
Except nothing you quoted is inaccurate. Kooky antivaxxers love to argue that getting vaccinated is useless or makes you more likely to suffer severe outcomes relative to remaining unvaccinated based on ignoring this very confounder. That, or they will advocate increasing your risk of infection to have that good ol' natural munity', which typically requires severe infections (if death doesn't result) to build decent protection. Either way, antivaxxers have to make themselves look insane to defend the indefensible.
48
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun