My g0d, leftists are so simpleminded that they can't trust their own intellect. They can't simply read and make up their own mind. They are so desperate to try to discredit Childrens Health Defense that they use biased 'fact-checkers' ad nauseam.
. . .
Why are [leftists] so afraid of open dialogue?
"Leftist," my ass. I've been a voter for 25+ years and not once have I cast a ballot on the Democratic line--for any office, in any election.
And I *do* trust my own intellect, thanks. That's what made me skeptical of the "news" from CHD. (MBFC just gives a pretty good summary of why CHD shouldn't be trusted.) I start from a position of skepticism about most of what I read, and *especially* if it seems to fit my preconceptions too neatly. Seems like a lot of people do they opposite: actively and uncritically search for anything that will *support* their preconceptions. Critical thinking, that ain't.
I get input from a variety of sources. (Well, not CNN and MSNBC--years ago, people I've learned to trust told me that that "news" was mostly "Orange man bad!" Boring, if nothing else.) I then form tentative opinions based on that input, and I'm ready to change those opinions--and have--based on getting additional *reliable* information.
CHD's grifting history of lies does not make it a generally reliable source. I'll read what it has to say, but I'll take it with a shaker of salt.
Yet you do not point to one thing CHD has claimed and shown it to be wrong.
Or even attempte to do so.
But accuse them of a grifting history of lies!
Not Big Pharma -- which has been caught in lies numerous times and been fined several billions over their dishonesty.
But CHD -- an organization that exposes Big Pharma's lies.
And this is why people think you're a troll: They think you're too smart *not* to know that something like CHD is utterly bogus.
"Overall, we rate the Children’s Health Defense a strong conspiracy and quackery level advocacy group that frequently promotes unsupported claims. We also rate them low for factual reporting due to the promotion of propaganda and several failed fact checks."
Sample failed fact checks:
Williamson Misleads on Children’s Health, Vaccines – False “Vaccine Injuries Ratio: One for Every 39 Vaccines Administered” – Unsupported “the autoimmune diseases and menstrual cycle problems and fertility problems […] and all of the other things that we’ve now seen are associated with the [HPV] vaccine” – Unsupported “[It] is nearly impossible to categorize post-vaccine deaths as vaccine-related” – Unsupported Vaccinated children are more likely to have adverse health outcomes like developmental delays, asthma, and ear infections compared to unvaccinated children. – Unsupported “vaccinated children appear to be significantly less healthy than the unvaccinated” – Unsupported “Thousands of COVID Vaccine Injuries and 13 U.S. Deaths Reported in December Alone”; “In December, 3,916 COVID vaccine-related adverse events, including 13 deaths, were reported to VAERS” – Unsupported U.S. Government Secretly Paid Major Media Outlets to Promote COVID Vaccines, Suppress Negative Coverage – False Inhaled Microplastics Found in Lung Tissue—Are Face Masks Contributing to the Problem? – False
My g0d, leftists are so simpleminded that they can't trust their own intellect. They can't simply read and make up their own mind. They are so desperate to try to discredit Childrens Health Defense that they use biased 'fact-checkers' ad nauseam.
They absolutely attacked Kennedy's most recent book, The Real Anthony Fauci, by releasing more than a dozen "review" books which they marketed in a way to try to fool people into buying them rather than the actual book.
The only people that believe fact-checker sites and review books are the people that write them.
Why are leftist so afraid of open dialogue?
Because Leftists believe in an authoritarian government. They believe in suppression of free speech & trashing the Bill of Rights. Recall all the governors & mayors that went mandate crazy. Forget informed consent & freedom of choice on the vaccines with the radical left.
One particular Leftist governor of an Eastern coastal state even went so far as saying in response to the unconstitutionality of the lockdowns that knowing the Bill of Rights "was above his pay grade." Lol.
We're not talking about moderate Democrats here but the radical left faction of the Democratic party that is dividing & destroying this country. But as I said previously, there's hope with the mid-terms.
My g0d, leftists are so simpleminded that they can't trust their own intellect. They can't simply read and make up their own mind. They are so desperate to try to discredit Childrens Health Defense that they use biased 'fact-checkers' ad nauseam.
They absolutely attacked Kennedy's most recent book, The Real Anthony Fauci, by releasing more than a dozen "review" books which they marketed in a way to try to fool people into buying them rather than the actual book.
The only people that believe fact-checker sites and review books are the people that write them.
Why are leftist so afraid of open dialogue?
Because Leftists believe in an authoritarian government. They believe in suppression of free speech & trashing the Bill of Rights. Recall all the governors & mayors that went mandate crazy. Forget informed consent & freedom of choice on the vaccines with the radical left.
One particular Leftist governor of an Eastern coastal state even went so far as saying in response to the unconstitutionality of the lockdowns that knowing the Bill of Rights "was above his pay grade." Lol.
We're not talking about moderate Democrats here but the radical left faction of the Democratic party that is dividing & destroying this country. But as I said previously, there's hope with the mid-terms.
Lockdowns were crude and not-very-effective in the US. Most states did not have strict lockdowns after early summer 2020.
Authoritarianism is bad - agree. If you get the right-wingers to stop trying to pass laws forcing private companies to host content they don't want to, then I will believe you are truly anti-authoritarian.
If you get the right-wingers to stop trying to pass laws forcing private companies to host content they don't want to, then I will believe you are truly anti-authoritarian.
Terrible example. I'm old enough to remember the 90s when half the countries in Africa were alarmingly reported to have HIV rates of 20, 30, even 35%. At the time I remember thinking, since the infected must be mostly from 18-40, since this is more than half of that demographic... And since they can't afford drugs, these countries would have populations more than 50% lower today. Nope. No change in populations. Barely a blip on the growth charts. Hmmmm. Now I wonder what killed all the gays in America. HIV or the treatment?
Life expectancies for countries heavily hit bit HIV/AIDS fell dramatically in the mid and late 90's, take a look at Botswana for example. The impact was huge. Thanks to aggressive public health efforts and distribution of scary Big Pharma drugs, many countries have bounced back.
Your argument proves my point. These countries were on track for demographic disaster were it not for effective AIDS therapies. Big Pharma wins again...
Color me shocked that you goal-seeked with your "research". Here's another chart for Botswana based on UN data that shows only positive population growth every year single year going back to 1960.
Interestingly, Botswana is still somehow miraculously over 20% HIV infected. Yet somehow, year after year, the population just keeps growing. But, but, but, they're getting magic Johnson's drug cocktail to keep them alive... lol. Clearly you have never been to Africa. The "infected" would sooner spend any money they had on shoelaces in a dried lizard tail from the local witch doctor then drugs from Big pharma. But for arguments sake, let's say they did believe in Western medicine. Remind me again how much big pharma's drug treatment for HIV costs?
Exact same astonishing lack of deaths can be found for any sub-Saharan country.
Much has been made about how there are false claims being made that most COVID deaths are in people with several comorbidities.
But what IS the actual percent of the general population, and of unvaccinated people, who have died without a comorbidity? I know CDC is on record saying 75% of vaccinated people who died have 4+ comorbidities. But I struggle finding any legit data about the rest of the population.
A parade of prominent people take 4 shots of mRNA goop, get infected with Covid, claim to have mild symptoms, start taking antiviral medication, then proclaim that the 4 shots are preventing their hospitalization and possible death.
I am unvaccinated. I was infected with the Omicron variant in January. I had mild symptoms. I did not take any medication. I did not go to a hospital. I did not die. The mild symptoms were gone in 2 days, followed by 10 days of a gradually clearing head cold.
Why the same outcome for them (four doses plus an antiviral) and me (zero doses, no antiviral) ?
20% lower sperm count among men that got the vaxx. Near as I can tell, this is great news… men who follow and are simpleminded enough to trust big pharma and government policy wonks about what they put into their bodies should not reproduce.
Mayim Bialik on Monday revealed her positive COVID diagnosis to fans on Instagram, explaining that she had contracted the virus after being vaccinated and boosted
Yes, suicide, chronic illness, and cancer in included in this papers analysis of "heart deaths."
Waiting to see if the people upset about 'with COVID' deaths being miscoded as 'from COVID' (they weren't except in very rare cases) will also take issue with this.
Color me shocked that you goal-seeked with your "research". Here's another chart for Botswana based on UN data that shows only positive population growth every year single year going back to 1960.
Interestingly, Botswana is still somehow miraculously over 20% HIV infected. Yet somehow, year after year, the population just keeps growing. But, but, but, they're getting magic Johnson's drug cocktail to keep them alive... lol. Clearly you have never been to Africa. The "infected" would sooner spend any money they had on shoelaces in a dried lizard tail from the local witch doctor then drugs from Big pharma. But for arguments sake, let's say they did believe in Western medicine. Remind me again how much big pharma's drug treatment for HIV costs?
Exact same astonishing lack of deaths can be found for any sub-Saharan country.
Your data shows the population growth rate falling almost 3-fold as the AIDS epidemic unfolded in the late 80s and 90s. This proves my point already.
You claim there is an 'astonishing lack of deaths' when deaths of 15-49 year olds increased >3x from 1990-2002:
Your argument, from what I can comprehend of your babbling, is that unless population growth rate goes negative then AIDS isn't deadly. Even ignoring the median survival time of untreated AIDS (8-10 years), that's asinine and directly contradicted by the evidence. You are the one clinging to a single metric (growth rate) and claiming victory when it doesn't meet your ad-hoc, unsupported standard you literally made up on the spot.
AIDS drugs are provided at very low costs in many African countries, often subsidized by charities. The result has been hundreds of thousands of lives saved.
Of course the AIDS denier is also a babbling antivaxxer. Don't need many brain cells to fall into either group.
Why the same outcome for them (four doses plus an antiviral) and me (zero doses, no antiviral) ?
Because people are different and their responses to a virus (any virus) are different. But you knew that, right? Some people died from smallpox; others, apparently similar, survived. And so on.
My sister and I, very similar in many ways (and showing very similar responses to other viruses over the course of our lifetimes), had very different outcomes when we were infected with SARS-CoV-2: She nearly died and was hospitalized for a month; I had symptoms for 48 hours (or a little less).
But TBH our situations were not exactly similar: She was unvaccinated and I was vaccinated and boosted.
It’s awesome to watch the anti vaxxers slowly lose their grip on reality. I may need to buy more guns because any day now these freaks will start knocking on doors in an attempt to break up a sex trafficking ring in a pizzeria or something.
An excellent portrait of the LR vaxx fear mongers:
✅ Triple-vaxxed and excited about boosters ✅ Afraid of germs ✅ Scared to death of death ✅ Follows the $cience ✅ Follows the guidelines ✅ Makes sure to always fit and to never stand out ✅ Is a sucker for conformity ✅ Dead in spirit ✅ Wants to rule you pic.twitter.com/ohjKFvEP18
12% of the total US Army (Active, Guard & Reserve) have said No to Covid vaccine.
"Army Will Be ‘Combat-Ineffective’ Unless It Moves June 30 Deadline"
"According to the whistleblower though, the “real numbers of unvaccinated service members are way higher than anybody thought,” adding that while “everyone thought” the number of unvaccinated in the Army was approximately 8,000-10,000 members, it is actually around 120,000."
12% of the total US Army (Active, Guard & Reserve) have said No to Covid vaccine.
"Army Will Be ‘Combat-Ineffective’ Unless It Moves June 30 Deadline"
"According to the whistleblower though, the “real numbers of unvaccinated service members are way higher than anybody thought,” adding that while “everyone thought” the number of unvaccinated in the Army was approximately 8,000-10,000 members, it is actually around 120,000."
12% of the total US Army (Active, Guard & Reserve) have said No to Covid vaccine.
"Army Will Be ‘Combat-Ineffective’ Unless It Moves June 30 Deadline"
"According to the whistleblower though, the “real numbers of unvaccinated service members are way higher than anybody thought,” adding that while “everyone thought” the number of unvaccinated in the Army was approximately 8,000-10,000 members, it is actually around 120,000."
Why the same outcome for them (four doses plus an antiviral) and me (zero doses, no antiviral) ?
Because people are different and their responses to a virus (any virus) are different. But you knew that, right? Some people died from smallpox; others, apparently similar, survived. And so on.
My sister and I, very similar in many ways (and showing very similar responses to other viruses over the course of our lifetimes), had very different outcomes when we were infected with SARS-CoV-2: She nearly died and was hospitalized for a month; I had symptoms for 48 hours (or a little less).
But TBH our situations were not exactly similar: She was unvaccinated and I was vaccinated and boosted.
When was this?
I hope you're not claiming that Omicron nearly killed your sister.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():focal(764x289:766x291)/Mayim-Bialik-91211f7d276e44209cb28813d21ddb7a.jpg)
