1. Vachik Mangassarian, actor. Who? We are supposed to have heard of this guy? Mangassarian, a character actor who appeared on “NCIS: Los Angeles” and “The Mentalist,” was vaccinated, his manager Valerie McCaffrey told CNN. Not well known enough to find out about his health pre Covid -- he was 78.
2. Ex-Washington State Trooper Robert LaMay. Who? Again, not a known person so cannot find out about any health isssues.
3. Kelly Ernby. Who?
4. Marcus Lamb. Who?
5. Bob Enyart. Who?
6 - 11. Marc Bernier, Phillip Valentine, Dick Farrel, Todd Tucker, Jimmy De Young, and Caleb Wallace. Who, who, who, who, who, and who.
12. Herman Cain. Finally someone we have heard of. Unfortunately, he was far from healthy prior to Covid. In 2006, he was diagnosed with stage IV liver and colon cancer.. near miracle he survived to 2020. To blame his death on Covid is disinfgenuous.
So 11 people virtually nobody had heard of and so we cannot find out about their health pre Covid and one guy with two deadly cancers.
Not one healthy famous person on that list
Similar to a list of "Celebrities running the New York Marathon", most are people I have never heard of. Herman Cain is the most famous person they can find and he was a cancer patient for 14 years. Remember how the fascists were telling the unvaxxed we were going to end up like Herman Cain ? Ask them about that now and they will tell you they were always advocates for medical freedom.
she was. DanM posted a link to wejo talking about a perma ban
I did not post that link, but it would satisfy the curiosity of many here if the BroJos could confirm the status of prolific posters who suddenly disappeared from LetsRun. Dead, banned, whatever.
News articles promoted by the petro-chemical clot shot corporations are quite simply propaganda and have nothing to do with the truth, which is that no virus has ever been isolated from uncontaminated material, which is a requirement to prove that a virus exists, and which kind of blows the theory that millions of people have died from one.
I'm not sure I follow your logic. Viral infection would require virions or viral genes to be present, correct? And materials with virions or viral genes present would be considered "contaminated", would they not? So the idea of isolating virions or viral genes from materials that are not contaminated - i.e. that do not have virions or viral genes in them - is ridiculous. You would be searching for viral material in a place that you have already explicitly qualified as viral-material-free. Am I misunderstanding your logic? It seems boneheaded.
Mumble jumble, shell game nonsense.
The bottom line is that if you can't isolate a virus apart from contaminated material, which you can't, then you cannot prove the existence of a virus.
Saying that a virus has been isolated without actually isolating one is total BS. Likewise saying there's a virus without ever having proved there's a virus is nonsense.
The bottom line is that if you can't isolate a virus apart from contaminated material, which you can't, then you cannot prove the existence of a virus.
Saying that a virus has been isolated without actually isolating one is total BS. Likewise saying there's a virus without ever having proved there's a virus is nonsense.
Obtaining virions or viral genes from material that does not have virions or viral material in it is impossible. I think the reason that it is impossible is obvious, but in case it's not, let me explain. You can't find something in a place if that thing is not there.
However, viruses can be isolated from material that does have viral material in it. In fact, it's quite easy! You could do it yourself if you wanted to. Then you could do a number of things with the virus. You could sequence its genome, you could take pictures of it with an electron microscope, or you could use it to infect fresh cells. All of these things can be done with commercially available kits. They are standard procedure in the biotech industry.
The bottom line is that if you can't isolate a virus apart from contaminated material, which you can't, then you cannot prove the existence of a virus.
Saying that a virus has been isolated without actually isolating one is total BS. Likewise saying there's a virus without ever having proved there's a virus is nonsense.
Obtaining virions or viral genes from material that does not have virions or viral material in it is impossible. I think the reason that it is impossible is obvious, but in case it's not, let me explain. You can't find something in a place if that thing is not there.
Exactly. The reason it can't be done is because there's no such thing as a virus.
Obtaining virions or viral genes from material that does not have virions or viral material in it is impossible. I think the reason that it is impossible is obvious, but in case it's not, let me explain. You can't find something in a place if that thing is not there.
Exactly. The reason it can't be done is because there's no such thing as a virus.
Starving and killing cells with antibiotics and then trying to say they were killed with viruses is total nonsense.
Similarly, tying elderly people down, paralyzing them with drugs against their will, cramming a tube down their throats to interfere with their breathing, choking and starving them to death with the use of antibiotic drugs is a barbaric criminal process and has nothing to do with a virus.
A new study covered by retired English nursing professor John Campbell has demonstrated a correlation between countries with high COVID vaccination levels an...
Starving and killing cells with antibiotics and then trying to say they were killed with viruses is total nonsense.
Similarly, tying elderly people down, paralyzing them with drugs against their will, cramming a tube down their throats to interfere with their breathing, choking and starving them to death with the use of antibiotic drugs is a barbaric criminal process and has nothing to do with a virus.
Okay. Again - what proof would you need to accept that viruses exist?
Starving and killing cells with antibiotics and then trying to say they were killed with viruses is total nonsense.
Similarly, tying elderly people down, paralyzing them with drugs against their will, cramming a tube down their throats to interfere with their breathing, choking and starving them to death with the use of antibiotic drugs is a barbaric criminal process and has nothing to do with a virus.
Okay. Again - what proof would you need to accept that viruses exist?
“Viruses don’t exist” started with HIV deniers, not wanting to believe that the “gay plague” - AIDS was anything but “immorality” being punished.
Once many mechanistic inhibitors of the HIV life cycle:
Entry inhibitors, Reverse Transcriptase inhibitors, Integrase inhibitors, and protease inhibitors
All effectively cured AIDS patients it became very hard to argue that a virus/ conserved infectious agent wasn’t the cause - even if you ignore the direct causative evidence from virology!