Why is everyone so obsessed with Gabby Petito?

fada tyme wrote:

marginal at best wrote:

You seem to have very little understanding of how this all works. T

I know exactly how it works. Right now he's not getting convicted based on what is publicly known. Is there information we haven't been told that ties him to the actual death and eliminates most "probables" and makes them "beyond a reasonable doubt"...I hope so. We don't know that there is.

There was one poster claiming running off to home was enough. That is way short of enough.

Do you want to bet that he gets convicted (assuming he doesn't commit suicide)?

marginal at besters wrote:

fada tyme wrote:

I know exactly how it works. Right now he's not getting convicted based on what is publicly known. Is there information we haven't been told that ties him to the actual death and eliminates most "probables" and makes them "beyond a reasonable doubt"...I hope so. We don't know that there is.

There was one poster claiming running off to home was enough. That is way short of enough.

Do you want to bet that he gets convicted (assuming he doesn't commit suicide)?

Today's SKOSSY award winner.

A few more outdoorsy acquaintances basically said the guy is either dead or he never went to the reserve. It would be near impossible to survive in that area without some pretty significant materials to camp not usually limited to one person setups. If he did just go there with a backpack, they are probably looking more for the backpack than him.

Discusss wrote:

I’m guessing they went with debit card theft instead of auto theft because the latter would be difficult to show proof of crime to get a warrant. He clearly had access to her van with her permission, and if something did happen to her, he’d be i reasonably expected to bring the van back as he did instead of abandoning it.

If they could get an autopsy forensic report limiting the time range of death, and he used her card after that date, she couldn’t have provided consent, hence crime.

Another hypothesis: they consider him a suicide risk and think a card theft charge is more likely to help them catch him alive.

FWIW, Nate the Lawyer pointed out these the District Court issued warrant made a stupid mistake on issuing the warrant for an obviously wrong charge even though the FBI’s indictment seeking the warrant had the right charge code on it.

Discusss wrote:

FWIW, Nate the Lawyer pointed out these the District Court issued warrant made a stupid mistake on issuing the warrant for an obviously wrong charge even though the FBI’s indictment seeking the warrant had the right charge code on it.

The warrant is pursuant to a Grand Jury indictment regarding credit card fraud. Is this Nate the "lawyer" claiming he know more about the evidence than a Grand Jury?

fada tyme wrote:

A few more outdoorsy acquaintances basically said the guy is either dead or he never went to the reserve. It would be near impossible to survive in that area without some pretty significant materials to camp not usually limited to one person setups. If he did just go there with a backpack, they are probably looking more for the backpack than him.

He didn't take his phone or wallet (not that they would help him survive in the wild) but he could always just be hiding in a family member's house or a close friend's house.

1500-3000-5000 wrote:

fada tyme wrote:

A few more outdoorsy acquaintances basically said the guy is either dead or he never went to the reserve. It would be near impossible to survive in that area without some pretty significant materials to camp not usually limited to one person setups. If he did just go there with a backpack, they are probably looking more for the backpack than him.

He didn't take his phone or wallet (not that they would help him survive in the wild) but he could always just be hiding in a family member's house or a close friend's house.

If he left the area, he couldn't use his phone. Harboring a fugitive is illegal so I don't know if a friend or family member would be willing to help him out. A spouse might be vehemently opposed to having him there as well. If he was my relative, I wouldn't help him. Would you?

SDSU Aztec wrote:

Harboring a fugitive is illegal so I don't know if a friend or family member would be willing to help him out. A spouse might be vehemently opposed to having him there as well. If he was my relative, I wouldn't help him. Would you?

The indictment of card theft is the only one actually brought against him thus far. Harboring someone wanted for that is unlikely to actually get law enforcement to come for the friend or family member. They’d have to prove that you knew there was a warrant out for him. It’s simply not going to be worth their while once he’s actually found.

On the other hand, he himself is unlikely to trust anyone except his parents, or perhaps not even his parents, at this point. From the timeline of events, it seems likely that his parents knew he was in serious trouble and helped him escape. It also seems unlikely that law enforcement can bring any charge against his parents given that, by bringing the card theft warrant, they themselves have effectively admitted that they don’t yet have probable cause to suspect he killed her, so why would the parents have had any reason to think he committed any crime?

SDSU Aztec wrote:

1500-3000-5000 wrote:

He didn't take his phone or wallet (not that they would help him survive in the wild) but he could always just be hiding in a family member's house or a close friend's house.

If he left the area, he couldn't use his phone. Harboring a fugitive is illegal so I don't know if a friend or family member would be willing to help him out. A spouse might be vehemently opposed to having him there as well. If he was my relative, I wouldn't help him. Would you?

Yes, if he's alive he's probably relying on a burner phone, cash, and bartering with people for food and supplies.

He's probably also several states away, nowhere near Florida, and was probably beyond Alabama or the Carolinas as soon as the day after he disappeared from his folks' home.

The only legit reason to scour the Carlton Reserve is if they believe he committed suicide there. But I'm not convinced this whole situation isn't some kind of cover to decoy, track down or stop some unassociated organized crime.

Go ahead and call this crazy, but I'm not even convinced Petito and Laundrie are real people, that the people we see in video and pictures aren't actors, and the CIA didn't make this whole thing up. Think about it: How have we not heard anything from childhood friends, associates or anyone who previously knew either person about who they were or what they were like? Their lives didn't begin when Petito started that (strangely thin in content) IG account let alone when they took that trip.

I think you are...um....on to something.

This would also explain why this case is getting more attention from the mainstream media than the missing cases of indigenous people or poc. It is because the msm is working with the CIA. Hmm....

Don't worry everyone. Dog the Bounty Hunter is on the case!

It's only a matter of time now.

SDSU Aztec wrote:

1500-3000-5000 wrote:

He didn't take his phone or wallet (not that they would help him survive in the wild) but he could always just be hiding in a family member's house or a close friend's house.

If he left the area, he couldn't use his phone. Harboring a fugitive is illegal so I don't know if a friend or family member would be willing to help him out. A spouse might be vehemently opposed to having him there as well. If he was my relative, I wouldn't help him. Would you?

I wouldn't help him either.

1500-3000-5000 wrote:

SDSU Aztec wrote:

If he left the area, he couldn't use his phone. Harboring a fugitive is illegal so I don't know if a friend or family member would be willing to help him out. A spouse might be vehemently opposed to having him there as well. If he was my relative, I wouldn't help him. Would you?

I wouldn't help him either.

I’d help any guy who gives some Stacy foid what she deserves.

this guy got gabby petito to bang him. i'm sure he can get his friends to hide him.

dude must be a charisma supernova.

There is an article where one of Petito's friends talks about Laundrie and Petito's relationship, it says that Laundrie was a bit off and that he was annoyed when Petito got a job because he couldn't keep watch her.

blunkered wrote:

Discusss wrote:

FWIW, Nate the Lawyer pointed out these the District Court issued warrant made a stupid mistake on issuing the warrant for an obviously wrong charge even though the FBI’s indictment seeking the warrant had the right charge code on it.

The warrant is pursuant to a Grand Jury indictment regarding credit card fraud. Is this Nate the "lawyer" claiming he know more about the evidence than a Grand Jury?

*knows

That went from reasonable to “Shouldn’t you be on the flat earth thread?” Really fast.

1500-3000-5000 wrote:

fada tyme wrote:

I think you are...um....on to something.

There is an article where one of Petito's friends talks about Laundrie and Petito's relationship, it says that Laundrie was a bit off and that he was annoyed when Petito got a job because he couldn't keep watch her.

saw the one vid that has a screen shot that possibly shows the pregnancy pics laying on a log.

so two theories

1) she dropped the news she was preg and he lost his sh*t cause he didnt want to be a dad, and killed her

2)she dropped the news she was preg and he knew it wasnt his so he lost it jealousy style rage and killed her