Vaccination coercion at universities

Gotta love the "Political" stance.. One side listens to science.. while the other.... It's all about your rights!

Remember the days when Everyone took the Polio shot or Measles and it Wasn't political? It was about science and what was best for the population.

GORP wrote:

Gotta love the "Political" stance.. One side listens to science.. while the other.... It's all about your rights!

Remember the days when Everyone took the Polio shot or Measles and it Wasn't political? It was about science and what was best for the population.

because one group is a bunch of feckless, selfish morons

screw everyone else, it's all about me

Scott Peters wrote:

Vaccines that have never been evaluated for long-term adverse reactions cannot be deemed safe by any means.

I'm curious what your end game is here if the vaccines are considered unsafe until they've been vetted more? Like how will we ever get through a Pandemic if there's just not enough time to determine the safety of a vaccine? You do know that they've been working on this vaccine for years now right? They just tailored it to the specifics of Covid 19. You do also know that we've had millions of people receive this vaccine with a VERY Low percentages of serious side-effects right? What more do you need to declare it "Safe"?

Scott Peters wrote:

Vaccines that have never been evaluated for long-term adverse reactions cannot be deemed safe by any means.

So this seems like a totally logical point. I will continue to rely on my natural Antibodies that will attach themselves to parts of viruses and alerts white blood cells to come in, attack and eliminate the virus.

This has worked pretty well for the last 10,000 years or so.....

Scott Peters wrote:

Vaccines that have never been evaluated for long-term adverse reactions cannot be deemed safe by any means.

What about COVID? Sure seems like it's causing long term adverse reactions in lots of people.

Why does that get a pass?

Also the precedent for vaccines with minimal short-term toxicity having lots of long-term effects is... zero.

Enough with the fearmongering.

wazzu1452 wrote:

Scott Peters wrote:

Vaccines that have never been evaluated for long-term adverse reactions cannot be deemed safe by any means.

So this seems like a totally logical point. I will continue to rely on my natural Antibodies that will attach themselves to parts of viruses and alerts white blood cells to come in, attack and eliminate the virus.

This has worked pretty well for the last 10,000 years or so.....

Yeah, true. Infectious disease kills basically nobody.

Seriously this is your dumbest post yet, I think.

Speed over 60 wrote:

Sure... let's have the Covid Varient run a monk on college campuses this fall.

Which variant? Will the Media still be pushing the delta variant this Fall or will it be a new one.

Remember when Covid ran amok on college campuses last Fall?

No?

Me neither.

It's all fear mongering BS to push the vaccines

wazzu1452 wrote:

Scott Peters wrote:

Vaccines that have never been evaluated for long-term adverse reactions cannot be deemed safe by any means.

So this seems like a totally logical point.

... until you realize that the vaccines have of course been evaluated for long-term adverse reactions.

Harambe wrote:

wazzu1452 wrote:

So this seems like a totally logical point. I will continue to rely on my natural Antibodies that will attach themselves to parts of viruses and alerts white blood cells to come in, attack and eliminate the virus.

This has worked pretty well for the last 10,000 years or so.....

Yeah, true. Infectious disease kills basically nobody.

Seriously this is your dumbest post yet, I think.

Yet every single one of your posts is dumber than his.

You are now in denial of the existence of the human immune system?

I like the term vaccine coercion. It is accurate. Unlike the BS media term vaccine "hesitation".

I come here for the comedy wrote:

wazzu1452 wrote:

So this seems like a totally logical point.

... until you realize that the vaccines have of course been evaluated for long-term adverse reactions.

They have? How? The work began on vaccines in he Spring of 2020 and they were 'approved" by year's end.

How did they evaluate long term adverse outcomes?

Just 0.05% of healthy under-70s who get Covid-19 will die from the disease

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8843927/Just-0-05-healthy-70s-Covid-19-die-disease-study-claims.html

Progressive 'men'

https://images.app.goo.gl/fu3hkH7qYWM8P4qY8

wazzu1452 wrote:

just 0.05% of healthy under-70s who get Covid-19 will die from the disease

god, you're just so so so stupid

first, there's a huge difference between "dying" and "getting sick"; just because someone doesn't die doesn't mean it's not an incredibly arduous thing that could be avoided, especially when no one knows the long-term impacts of it

second, people under-70, guess what, they have family who might be! and they might know people who have auto-immune issues or just generally don't want to get a virus that has killed 500,000 people in this country alone, your selfish idiot

i can't believe i'm even wasting time replying to someone so stupid

for the last time, it's not about you, it's about everyone else

you might be safe, others might not be -- therefore you need to think about other people for once in your life, it's not just about you and your pathetic, stupid, racist existence

wazzu1452 wrote:

Just 0.05% of healthy under-70s who get Covid-19 will die from the disease

Ask a 25 year old runner if missing 4 weeks of training due to COVID is a problem?

My guess is you've never run a step in your life so you wouldn't get it. (Or maybe a hobby jogger)

These vaccines should be contraindicated in anyone of the age of 30. Thus far over the last 6 months they are responsible for more reports of death and adverse reactions than all other vaccines combined in the USA over the last 24 years. COVID-19 vaccines have never been mandated in a university in United States until the pharmaceutical industry found it could make over $30 billion in profit by bribing educational institutions to mandate Covid-19 vaccines to colleges, universities, and schools aged students . Again, The clinical trials for these vaccines are not complete and will not be complete until 2022. These vaccines have not been evaluate for long-term adverse reactions, carcinogenesis, mutagenesis, or for long-term effects on fertility, add until then they cannot be deemed safe.

Harambe wrote:

[quote]wazzu1452 wrote:

Just 0.05% of healthy under-70s who get Covid-19 will die from the disease

Ask a 25 year old runner if missing 4 weeks of training due to COVID is a problem?

I would but I don't know any.

Do you?

How about 25 year olds who get cancer? Get in car wrecks? Have heart issues?

You know, things that actually happen?

Want to talk about them?

Scott Peters wrote:

These vaccines should be contraindicated in anyone of the age of 30. Thus far over the last 6 months they are responsible for more reports of death and adverse reactions than all other vaccines combined in the USA over the last 24 years. COVID-19 vaccines have never been mandated in a university in United States until the pharmaceutical industry found it could make over $30 billion in profit by bribing educational institutions to mandate Covid-19 vaccines to colleges, universities, and schools aged students . Again, The clinical trials for these vaccines are not complete and will not be complete until 2022. These vaccines have not been evaluate for long-term adverse reactions, carcinogenesis, mutagenesis, or for long-term effects on fertility, add until then they cannot be deemed safe.

You're wrong. VAERS can't be used to judge causality.

Has COVID been evaluated for carcinogenesis. Plenty of documented long term effects from the disease.

Yawn. This is basement-tier fearmongering. Send your kid to Liberty U if you're so upset lol

Covid-19 deaths in healthy people are very rare. Healthy athletes don’t need a vaccine or any other drugs. Count the number of high school or athletes who died from Covid -19 in the USA?

wazzu1452 wrote:

Scott Peters wrote:

Vaccines that have never been evaluated for long-term adverse reactions cannot be deemed safe by any means.

So this seems like a totally logical point. I will continue to rely on my natural Antibodies that will attach themselves to parts of viruses and alerts white blood cells to come in, attack and eliminate the virus.

This has worked pretty well for the last 10,000 years or so.....

You know your natural antibodies will be more effective if they've been exposed to the vaccine. The vaccine contains a dismembered part of the RNA of the virus, therefore your immune system will already have the correct T cells to stop the virus from infecting you, should you be exposed to it.

It's not the vaccine itself that's protecting you, it's your immune system having been trained to deal with it.

The first rudimentary vaccines for smallpox were used in the 14th century. They would take scabs from recently deceased smallpox victims, crush them up and blow the powder up the nose of others. Because the virus had decayed, it did not prevent serious infection but had a protective effect in the future because the immune system recognized an infection earlier, before the virus could cause disease.

If 14th century Chinese peasants could understand that, then so can you.

Then again it is likely that no more than 5% of negative outcomes following the VAX get reported to VAERS.

As to causation, let's take a page from the Covid hucksters and claim every bad outcome following the vax is due to the vax. Call it dying with the Vax.