Salvitore Stitchmo wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
My god - NOTHING on wavelight in terms of performance enhancement. Nothing.
Really? You can't think of anything? You mean it's harder to follow the runners in front of you than a light on a track?
Bro. You come on these boards portraying this sense of higher education and "facts" and the whole deal - and honestly some of your opinions are valid and I like your points of view.
But did you read this correctly before opening your mouth here? Did you see the point I was making in context?
The context was that while there is a large narrative that athletes are simply strapping on spikes (which I know for a fact have nothing new about them other than a lightweight foam that compresses easily and hence has allowed for cushioning in products that industry for decades didn't think was important - know this because I work on these products in one of the brand that creates these products) and believe that this is the primary reason for the destruction of multiple seconds off world records in distance events, I am saying that wavelight is comparatively a far bigger performance enhancer. Just read it mate. Reeeaaaaad.
What else can I think of? Doping - sure, great, way to state the obvious. I am going to assume in this case that if JC was doping during his WR races he either still is or even if he has stopped he effects of the training he did whilst doping (the real benefit) didn't disappear in 8 months so this to me is irrelevant.
I don't understand your point about following lights or runners but since I also was a professional athlete that ran maybe 80 or so races across my career including an Olympics, World Championships etc - following a light is considerably easier and more efficient than following a human athlete for a number of reasons. If you want that discussion just let me know.
Back to the original point - you know I find it ironic you come here and bash Americans with your self-righteous "center of the world" kiwi attitude but a lot of it is hypocrisy because you are just as bad (not reading, jumping to conclusions, being unnecessarily antagonistic etc)
How does that feel? Ya muppet.[/quote]
Strangely, I don't feel much at all. But I am also trying to unravel what you said to discover a coherent point buried in there somewhere.
The only point I was making was that in the context of performance it tends to overstate the issue to say nothing exceeds the effect of wave light, as you said, when doping is still arguably the far greater performance enhancer. It also overstates the case for wavelight to say that it exceeds human pacing when there are extant world records (the 1500, mile and 3k) made without it, and it is just as likely that the latest records were the result more of doping than pacing technology. You have gotten yourself a little overexcited - about everything.