Armstronglivs wrote:
rekrunner wrote:
*If" they are faster?
It would be more credible if you could form a conclusion that wasn't also your assumption.
My philosophy is to follow the science.
Your own statement above, that suggests doping hasn't had an affect on times, is an assumption, Einstein. "If" athletes are not faster than what they would have run clean then doping has no effect. Another assumption. But that conclusion is consistent with your delusions, that you pretentiously label a "philosophy". The doping equivalent of a Covid denier.
On the contrary, in my statement above, I explicitly assumed powerful, rampant, and undetected doping, before counting 35 years of historical results since Ingrid Kristiansen.
You are not very strong in reading comprehension.