So these con artist vaccine companies are not liable at all. Yet the government is trying to deflect blame and hold others accountable instead now. This is sickening! Wow.
STEVE THE ADDICT^^^^^^""""""""-- wrote:
So these con artist vaccine companies are not liable at all. Yet the government is trying to deflect blame and hold others accountable instead now. This is sickening! Wow.
Moderna has never brought a product to market... and then, magic!
burnin' down the house wrote:
STEVE THE ADDICT^^^^^^""""""""-- wrote:
So these con artist vaccine companies are not liable at all. Yet the government is trying to deflect blame and hold others accountable instead now. This is sickening! Wow.
Moderna has never brought a product to market... and then, magic!
This... is fun logic if you really subscribe to it. No company is allowed to make new things.
Harambe wrote:
https://www.hrdive.com/news/nearly-a-year-into-the-pandemic-employers-brace-for-coronavirus-lawsuits/594068/
Non sequitur... But thanks for playing
Via Wikipedia: "Natural News is a far-right, anti-vaccination conspiracy theory and fake news website known for promoting pseudoscience and far-right extremism."
1. Do you have anything from some source other than "natural news"?
2. Even at a workplace with *mandated* vaccines, nearly all people who get the vaccine will do so voluntarily or would have gotten it absent the mandate.
Is the employer on the hook for those too?
How do you identify and separate those who:
-Got willingly vaccinated and had a reaction
from those who
-Got vaccinated "under duress" and had a reaction?
colder and wiser wrote:
Via Wikipedia: "Natural News is a far-right, anti-vaccination conspiracy theory and fake news website known for promoting pseudoscience and far-right extremism."
I figured..
*fact check wrote:
Harambe wrote:
https://www.hrdive.com/news/nearly-a-year-into-the-pandemic-employers-brace-for-coronavirus-lawsuits/594068/Non sequitur... But thanks for playing
Think about it a little more
Wikipedia is left leaning. Unreliable source.
colder and wiser wrote:
Via Wikipedia: "Natural News is a far-right, anti-vaccination conspiracy theory and fake news website known for promoting pseudoscience and far-right extremism."
Any place that fearmongers GMOs is obviously trite garbage.
Nothing wrong with wanting to eat natural
BigYawn wrote:
Nothing wrong with wanting to eat natural
As long as you are ok with meaningless virtue signaling.
Lol, like I brag to my coworker if my food is gmo free. I eat gmo free when I can because I can. I’m sorry you are so damaged natural foods trigger you.
BigYawn wrote:
Lol, like I brag to my coworker if my food is gmo free. I eat gmo free when I can because I can. I’m sorry you are so damaged natural foods trigger you.
That's perfectly within your rights! However a source that openly fearmongers GMOs shows alarming misunderstanding of basic science, so probably is not a trustworthy place for vaccine information.
BigYawn wrote:
Lol, like I brag to my coworker if my food is gmo free. I eat gmo free when I can because I can. I’m sorry you are so damaged natural foods trigger you.
All crops are GMOs if you want to get specific. Selective breeding - how all crops were created over hundreds/thousands of years is a slower and more random process than modern GM techniques - and can lead to things like loss of nutritional value, toxicity, and disease susceptibility! Modern GMOs are better!
2600 bro wrote:
BigYawn wrote:
Lol, like I brag to my coworker if my food is gmo free. I eat gmo free when I can because I can. I’m sorry you are so damaged natural foods trigger you.
All crops are GMOs if you want to get specific. Selective breeding - how all crops were created over hundreds/thousands of years is a slower and more random process than modern GM techniques - and can lead to things like loss of nutritional value, toxicity, and disease susceptibility! Modern GMOs are better!
We can play word games all you want; of course evolution has changed plants. Modern gmos are certainly not better.
Submitted for the judgment of the LRC supremes... Another article: https://www.enr.com/articles/51691-osha-imposes-new-guidance-for-employer-required-covid-19-vaccines Link to OSHA COVID vaccine FAQhttps://www.osha.gov/coronavirus/faqs#vaccine I think I would need an lawyer to interpret whether this says employers are liable if vaccine is required. It does say the incident is recordable.
OSHA FAQ:
If you require your employees to be vaccinated as a condition of employment (i.e., for work-related reasons), then any adverse reaction to the COVID-19 vaccine is work-related. The adverse reaction is recordable if it is a new case under 29 CFR 1904.6 and meets one or more of the general recording criteria in 29 CFR 1904.7.
BigYawn wrote:
2600 bro wrote:
All crops are GMOs if you want to get specific. Selective breeding - how all crops were created over hundreds/thousands of years is a slower and more random process than modern GM techniques - and can lead to things like loss of nutritional value, toxicity, and disease susceptibility! Modern GMOs are better!
We can play word games all you want; of course evolution has changed plants. Modern gmos are certainly not better.
BigYawn wrote:
2600 bro wrote:
All crops are GMOs if you want to get specific. Selective breeding - how all crops were created over hundreds/thousands of years is a slower and more random process than modern GM techniques - and can lead to things like loss of nutritional value, toxicity, and disease susceptibility! Modern GMOs are better!
We can play word games all you want; of course evolution has changed plants. Modern gmos are certainly not better.
No no evolution and selective breeding are not the same thing.
Selective breeding is just praying you get the trait you want while stumbling blindly through all the other changes that come with it. Modern GM tech is precise! Literally a direct upgrade!