A bit surprised that the LR hawks have not picked up on the story (only the headline is a bombshell – and inaccurate at that) on the LR front page of the Iowa high school sprinter / football player who “de-committed to Yale” because he was recruited to play football, but wants to run track.
As reported in the Des Moines Register, there are so many inconsistencies that it is hard to know where to start.
The essence of the story is this: Aaron Smith has backed out of his admissions “commitment” to Yale because he wants to wants to run track instead of play football. A noble aim, many on LR would say. But, he did this without having a back-up. Leaving Yale (before arriving) without having another destination! At worst this sounds suspicious and at best it indicates several mis-understandings on the part of the Register, more used to covering Iowa and Iowa State than covering the Ivies.
First of all, the Ivy League does not use the national letter of intent which is a semi-binding commitment. Smith’s “commit” to Yale would be 1) apply, 2) be admitted by the Admissions Office, not by the football coach, 3) put down the required deposit to hold his place in the class of ’25, like any other applicant.
What’s more, at Yale Smith is not required to play football (or run track, or play in the band…) in order to keep his financial aid. The Ivies and some top D3 liberal arts colleges don’t work that way.
Smith could run track at Yale, or play football and run track, or do neither, and still be matriculated at Yale with full financial support.
What’s more, his high school times would seem to be better suited to Yale than to LSU, Florida or USC: 22.09 for the 200 and 49.37 for the 400. In the 2019 Ivy League Championships there were 11 runners under 22.00 and the winner ran 21.01. Good for young people who spend a lot of time in the library, but not going to scare anyone at the NCAAs.
All in all, it makes a good headline and an interesting story, but leaves some pretty basic questions unanswered.