high school xc coach wrote:
swings and misses wrote:
Feel free to show me some brazenly false leftist threads started so far today.
I don't need to show you a thread, there is a liberal mainstream media article posted in THIS thread with a perfect fake news title.
So we are in agreement that leftist Letsrun posters don’t stoop as low?
Who wouldn't trust the Jerusalem Post?
swings and misses wrote:
high school xc coach wrote:
I don't need to show you a thread, there is a liberal mainstream media article posted in THIS thread with a perfect fake news title.
So we are in agreement that leftist Letsrun posters don’t stoop as low?
You are delusional if you think you have won this argument. Your attempt to move the goal posts and claim victory is cringeworthy
Professional rioters excluded, of course.
Patrick O'Connor, a solicitor and coroner based in Mayo, said that Ireland's daily reported coronavirus deaths "do not have a scientific basis".
The Irish Government has reported 4,831 deaths linked to the virus since the outbreak of the pandemic and O'Connor, who serves as public information officer for the Coroner's Society of Ireland, said that he questions the accuracy of NPHET's reporting when the virus is recorded as the principal cause of death in terminally ill patients.
He stressed that there was a difference between dying from the virus and dying with it.
"When a person is suffering from a number of medical conditions which will or may lead to their death at some short time in the future, if they are unlucky enough to be infected by the COVID virus then at death if they prove to be COVID positive in a test, it is that which is recorded as the principal cause of death — even though that person may have been terminally ill with a short life-expectancy prior to such testing," O'Connor told the Irish Independent.
Meanwhile, Kildare coroner Dr. Denis Cusack said that 99% of the 230 coronavirus deaths reported in Kildare had underlying conditions - a total of 228 people.
Of those 228 deaths, 132 had a cardiovascular condition, 120 had dementia, 58 had respiratory problems, 36 had cancer, 30 had a neurological condition, 25 had diabetes, and 23 had kidney problems.
ummmmm wrote:
swings and misses wrote:
So we are in agreement that leftist Letsrun posters don’t stoop as low?
You are delusional if you think you have won this argument. Your attempt to move the goal posts and claim victory is cringeworthy
Feel free to back up your rebukes with examples, while we post back and forth on another patently false right wing thread.
The Unkle wrote:
Patrick O'Connor, a solicitor and coroner based in Mayo, said that Ireland's daily reported coronavirus deaths "do not have a scientific basis".
The Irish Government has reported 4,831 deaths linked to the virus since the outbreak of the pandemic and O'Connor, who serves as public information officer for the Coroner's Society of Ireland, said that he questions the accuracy of NPHET's reporting when the virus is recorded as the principal cause of death in terminally ill patients.
He stressed that there was a difference between dying from the virus and dying with it.
"When a person is suffering from a number of medical conditions which will or may lead to their death at some short time in the future, if they are unlucky enough to be infected by the COVID virus then at death if they prove to be COVID positive in a test, it is that which is recorded as the principal cause of death — even though that person may have been terminally ill with a short life-expectancy prior to such testing," O'Connor told the Irish Independent.
Meanwhile, Kildare coroner Dr. Denis Cusack said that 99% of the 230 coronavirus deaths reported in Kildare had underlying conditions - a total of 228 people.
Of those 228 deaths, 132 had a cardiovascular condition, 120 had dementia, 58 had respiratory problems, 36 had cancer, 30 had a neurological condition, 25 had diabetes, and 23 had kidney problems.
The forgotten truth of this “pandemic”
That’s fine. I don’t live in Oregon and have no reason to visit Oregon. They can do whatever they want. If the voters don’t like it, vote someone else in. Otherwise, carry on with your lives.
SDSU Aztec wrote:
ummmmm wrote:
I’m against masks but I just reported your post. The article clearly says they are “mulling it over”. They did not make a permanent mandate yet
This is the intent:
" A top health official is considering indefinitely extending rules requiring masks and social distancing in all workplaces in the state. The proposal would keep the rules in place until they're “no longer necessary."
Until no longer necessary and permanently, do not mean the same thing.
Someone linking a article they didn't read seems to happen more often from people on the right
Wearing masks has decimated the cases of flu this winter. Flu illnesses are contained to anti-mask areas. Businesses are likely to want employees to wear masks to avoid the cost of sick days.
Got up too lazy to s have, oh yeah.....a mask...cool!
Anyone freaking out over a mask, hahahaha!!!!!!
[quote]flu be gone wrote:
Wearing masks has decimated the cases of flu this winter. Flu illnesses are contained to anti-mask areas.
Which areas are those? What are the stats?
ummmmm wrote:
Of those 228 deaths, 132 had a cardiovascular condition, 120 had dementia, 58 had respiratory problems, 36 had cancer, 30 had a neurological condition, 25 had diabetes, and 23 had kidney problems.
The forgotten truth of this “pandemic”[/quote]
Sure, and they person who was in a major car accident, who died in the hospital, and had an underlying heart condition died of the heart condition. That their chest was crushed in the accident was not the cause of death. A crushed heart that was unhealthy was the "real" cause of death.
CarbonFiberJoe wrote:
Exactly, my title is basically a re-wording of the Associated Press's title.
A re-wording of a misleading title does not make it true. Oregon law appears to require a mandate to be called permanent to extend it. Conservative reporters saw the word "permanent", pleasured themselves and put it in the title.
It was the same thing with the OP that claimed the BLM founder purchased a home in Malibu even though the article stated the house was located halfway between Malibu and Calabasas.
SDSU Aztec wrote:
CarbonFiberJoe wrote:
Exactly, my title is basically a re-wording of the Associated Press's title.
A re-wording of a misleading title does not make it true. Oregon law appears to require a mandate to be called permanent to extend it. Conservative reporters saw the word "permanent", pleasured themselves and put it in the title.
It was the same thing with the OP that claimed the BLM founder purchased a home in Malibu even though the article stated the house was located halfway between Malibu and Calabasas.
It’s a trend around here.
swings and misses wrote:
SDSU Aztec wrote:
A re-wording of a misleading title does not make it true. Oregon law appears to require a mandate to be called permanent to extend it. Conservative reporters saw the word "permanent", pleasured themselves and put it in the title.
It was the same thing with the OP that claimed the BLM founder purchased a home in Malibu even though the article stated the house was located halfway between Malibu and Calabasas.
It’s a trend around here.
Well actually the cited article in the original post did not put it incorrectly, but the OP did. The AP article is actually the one who made the misleading article title, which is a progressive leaning source.
ummmmm wrote:
swings and misses wrote:
It’s a trend around here.
Well actually the cited article in the original post did not put it incorrectly, but the OP did. The AP article is actually the one who made the misleading article title, which is a progressive leaning source.
That’s why I said, “around here”.
SDSU Aztec wrote:
CarbonFiberJoe wrote:
Exactly, my title is basically a re-wording of the Associated Press's title.
A re-wording of a misleading title does not make it true. Oregon law appears to require a mandate to be called permanent to extend it. Conservative reporters saw the word "permanent", pleasured themselves and put it in the title.
It was the same thing with the OP that claimed the BLM founder purchased a home in Malibu even though the article stated the house was located halfway between Malibu and Calabasas.
I wouldn't call it "misleading" because it will happen in 2 or 3 days anyway. So in the end you'll just be nitpicking.
PS this isn't a "conservative" or "leftist" thread. I did not vote for either party in the previous elections.
CarbonFiberJoe wrote:
SDSU Aztec wrote:
A re-wording of a misleading title does not make it true. Oregon law appears to require a mandate to be called permanent to extend it. Conservative reporters saw the word "permanent", pleasured themselves and put it in the title.
It was the same thing with the OP that claimed the BLM founder purchased a home in Malibu even though the article stated the house was located halfway between Malibu and Calabasas.
I wouldn't call it "misleading" because it will happen in 2 or 3 days anyway. So in the end you'll just be nitpicking.
There will never be a permanent requirement to wear masks. That's common sense and is why the thread title triggered my bullsh*t meter.
SDSU Aztec wrote:
There will never be a permanent requirement to wear masks. That's common sense and is why the thread title triggered my bullsh*t meter.
Right, there will just be "temporary" requirements that never go away.