FB is the new Josef Goebbels. Heil!
FB is the new Josef Goebbels. Heil!
23456 wrote:
I see we still have an uninformed person who thinks only 6% of Covid19 deaths were due to Covid19. All of the deaths were due to Covid19. Less than 10% didn't have a pre-existing condition. This was addressed hundreds of times, months ago.
Meaning you were proven wrong hundreds of times, months ago. Over and over again. Are you a glutton for punishment?
The thing we science people understand is that in the past, if you died of heart disease or old age, the doctors didn't blame it on flu just because that was the final nail in your coffin. They didn't even test for it.
New rules force them to blame these things on a particular coronavirus if they even suspect its involvement. Radically different methodology means radically different data and comparing the old to the new is an apples/oranges fallacy.
The truth of it wrote:
Even if it was true, 540,000 dead from covid, one dead from vaccine.
Massive overstatement of deaths due to Covid and massive understatement of deaths due to vaccine.
Bad Wigins wrote:
23456 wrote:
I see we still have an uninformed person who thinks only 6% of Covid19 deaths were due to Covid19. All of the deaths were due to Covid19. Less than 10% didn't have a pre-existing condition. This was addressed hundreds of times, months ago.
Meaning you were proven wrong hundreds of times, months ago. Over and over again. Are you a glutton for punishment?
The thing we science people understand is that in the past, if you died of heart disease or old age, the doctors didn't blame it on flu just because that was the final nail in your coffin. They didn't even test for it.
New rules force them to blame these things on a particular coronavirus if they even suspect its involvement. Radically different methodology means radically different data and comparing the old to the new is an apples/oranges fallacy.
COVID listed as the underlying cause of death on 92+% of death certificates involving COVID.
Your 6%-meme is so hilariously wrong it's now bordering 2600 cases as the dumbest thing you've said in the last 13 months. Keep it up baddie
Bad Wigins wrote:
23456 wrote:
I see we still have an uninformed person who thinks only 6% of Covid19 deaths were due to Covid19. All of the deaths were due to Covid19. Less than 10% didn't have a pre-existing condition. This was addressed hundreds of times, months ago.
Meaning you were proven wrong hundreds of times, months ago. Over and over again. Are you a glutton for punishment?
The thing we science people understand is that in the past, if you died of heart disease or old age, the doctors didn't blame it on flu just because that was the final nail in your coffin. They didn't even test for it.
New rules force them to blame these things on a particular coronavirus if they even suspect its involvement. Radically different methodology means radically different data and comparing the old to the new is an apples/oranges fallacy.
Given that 94% of "Covid deaths" has other life threatening conditions, that the median age is over 80, that 40% died in nursing homes where only a little more than 1/3rd of the people last a full year, and the way they count Covid (linked or related) deaths, I would say 6% of the official number of deaths is a pretty good guess as to the actual number
Harambe wrote:
Bad Wigins wrote:
Meaning you were proven wrong hundreds of times, months ago. Over and over again. Are you a glutton for punishment?
The thing we science people understand is that in the past, if you died of heart disease or old age, the doctors didn't blame it on flu just because that was the final nail in your coffin. They didn't even test for it.
New rules force them to blame these things on a particular coronavirus if they even suspect its involvement. Radically different methodology means radically different data and comparing the old to the new is an apples/oranges fallacy.
COVID listed as the underlying cause of death on 92+% of death certificates involving COVID.
Your 6%-meme is so hilariously wrong it's now bordering 2600 cases as the dumbest thing you've said in the last 13 months. Keep it up baddie
Notice how this guy never makes a logical argument? Just name calls and regurgitates the official talking points?
The Unkle wrote:
The truth of it wrote:
Even if it was true, 540,000 dead from covid, one dead from vaccine.
Massive overstatement of deaths due to Covid and massive understatement of deaths due to vaccine.
It took you 3 mins to log out of one handle and log back in with another?
Fact-Jack wrote:
The truth of it wrote:
Someone is using this site to spread dangerous misinformation. Even if it was true, 540,000 dead from covid, one dead from vaccine.
540,000 is a BS number. We all know that
0/10
Please try to make your troll posts more entertaining.
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htmThe Unkle wrote:
Harambe wrote:
COVID listed as the underlying cause of death on 92+% of death certificates involving COVID.
Your 6%-meme is so hilariously wrong it's now bordering 2600 cases as the dumbest thing you've said in the last 13 months. Keep it up baddie
Notice how this guy never makes a logical argument? Just name calls and regurgitates the official talking points?
Unk, we've been through this! You keep re-hashing the same material, you really need to inject some freshness into your troll posts. It's just not entertaining enough for me!
Simply repeating the same debunked fact is not creative trolling, my man.
Bad Wigins wrote:
23456 wrote:
I see we still have an uninformed person who thinks only 6% of Covid19 deaths were due to Covid19. All of the deaths were due to Covid19. Less than 10% didn't have a pre-existing condition. This was addressed hundreds of times, months ago.
Meaning you were proven wrong hundreds of times, months ago. Over and over again. Are you a glutton for punishment?
The thing we science people understand is that in the past, if you died of heart disease or old age, the doctors didn't blame it on flu just because that was the final nail in your coffin. They didn't even test for it.
New rules force them to blame these things on a particular coronavirus if they even suspect its involvement. Radically different methodology means radically different data and comparing the old to the new is an apples/oranges fallacy.
Hey bad, I know you're not a troll, just mentally handicapped.
Check out this website and get back to me
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htmHey Bad, I wonder if you remember posting this?
Bad Wigins wrote:
You all think you can make every other fact go away by just attacking me, as usual. I'm surprised you haven't accused me of making all the posts on this thread.
What's really stupid is that this one prediction (of many I've made) is well within an order of magnitude of the probable eventual result. For cases to reach even 10,000 by April would require sustained 8% growth: 1.08^17 = 3.7. Only way that happens is if they ramp up testing even more, and if they do that, down goes the death rate. No cherry-picking.
Everyone saying a million or even 100,000 was utterly clueless by comparison.
Gosh, you really are a moron.
Conservative Christian wrote:
Hey Bad, I wonder if you remember posting this?
Bad Wigins wrote:
You all think you can make every other fact go away by just attacking me, as usual. I'm surprised you haven't accused me of making all the posts on this thread.
What's really stupid is that this one prediction (of many I've made) is well within an order of magnitude of the probable eventual result. For cases to reach even 10,000 by April would require sustained 8% growth: 1.08^17 = 3.7. Only way that happens is if they ramp up testing even more, and if they do that, down goes the death rate. No cherry-picking.
Everyone saying a million or even 100,000 was utterly clueless by comparison.
Gosh, you really are a moron.
He's gone from the thread now. One mention of 2600 and he flees
The truth of it wrote:
Yeah, about that... wrote:
Wow indeed.
"Overall, we rate The BL . . . Biased and Questionable based on the promotion of conspiracy theories, . . . propaganda, the use of poor sources, a lack of transparency, and false or misleading information."
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-bl/Someone is using this site to spread dangerous misinformation. Even if it was true, 540,000 dead from covid, one dead from vaccine.
So what are you saying? Fact checkers proved something by mocking the source? Is that all it takes now to be considered dangerous misinformation? Are you saying this woan did not die, did not get the vaccine and have her complaints flagged on facebook by people like yourself. Do you consider knowledge of such occurances as dangerous to your naive view of reality? What is it that is dangerous or misinformation? I know plenty of people that were wrecked by the jj vaccine, are they lying to me and spreading dangerous info by saying they felt horrible for weeks?
Lead Foil Hat III wrote:
The truth of it wrote:
Someone is using this site to spread dangerous misinformation. Even if it was true, 540,000 dead from covid, one dead from vaccine.
So what are you saying? Fact checkers proved something by mocking the source? Is that all it takes now to be considered dangerous misinformation? Are you saying this woan did not die, did not get the vaccine and have her complaints flagged on facebook by people like yourself. Do you consider knowledge of such occurances as dangerous to your naive view of reality? What is it that is dangerous or misinformation? I know plenty of people that were wrecked by the jj vaccine, are they lying to me and spreading dangerous info by saying they felt horrible for weeks?
Where is the fact check of mediabiasfactcheck, are they just spreading propaganda "misinfo"?
and brojos support unequivocal lies and disinformation, they say in the name of free speech, but in reality they are just bad folks
Harambe wrote:
Bad Wigins wrote:
Meaning you were proven wrong hundreds of times, months ago. Over and over again. Are you a glutton for punishment?
The thing we science people understand is that in the past, if you died of heart disease or old age, the doctors didn't blame it on flu just because that was the final nail in your coffin. They didn't even test for it.
New rules force them to blame these things on a particular coronavirus if they even suspect its involvement. Radically different methodology means radically different data and comparing the old to the new is an apples/oranges fallacy.
COVID listed as the underlying cause of death on 92+% of death certificates involving COVID.
Your 6%-meme is so hilariously wrong it's now bordering 2600 cases as the dumbest thing you've said in the last 13 months. Keep it up baddie
Dear 23456, please just accept that Harambe is a very naive and stupid manchild and you will be ok. He believes what he is told despite mountains of reason that say it makes no sense. It is ok, we will be ok even if Harambe does not smarten up.
Why? Is it because you need the cnn reality to be true and they let people say that they don't buy it? Living must be hard for you. I am sorry.
Conservative Christian wrote:
Bad Wigins wrote:
Meaning you were proven wrong hundreds of times, months ago. Over and over again. Are you a glutton for punishment?
The thing we science people understand is that in the past, if you died of heart disease or old age, the doctors didn't blame it on flu just because that was the final nail in your coffin. They didn't even test for it.
New rules force them to blame these things on a particular coronavirus if they even suspect its involvement. Radically different methodology means radically different data and comparing the old to the new is an apples/oranges fallacy.
Hey bad, I know you're not a troll, just mentally handicapped.
Check out this website and get back to me
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htm
Excess deaths is a scam The cdc dropped their estimate is deaths per week by 2000 in March 2020. Why would they do that so suddenly if it was anything other than political? Excess deaths are likely half to a third of the declared number, many of which are people who died avoiding the health care system.
Harambe wrote:
Conservative Christian wrote:
Hey Bad, I wonder if you remember posting this?
Gosh, you really are a moron.
He's gone from the thread now. One mention of 2600 and he flees
This does not change the fact that you are still an idiot shill for the left wing propaganda arm.
LMAO what about Harambe's positions on various issues could possibly be construed as "left-wing." "Anyone who disagrees with me is a leftist" Also the excess death threshold change is CLEARLY laid out in the modeling paper we've linked you to many times. Even if the drop of 2k per week was "political" that only accounts for ~60000k excess deaths! Harambe demonstrated that a simple linear regression still shows enormous (450k+) excess deaths for 2020 - if that floats your boat.
Lead Foil Hat III wrote:
Harambe wrote:
He's gone from the thread now. One mention of 2600 and he flees
This does not change the fact that you are still an idiot shill for the left wing propaganda arm.