LateRunnerPhil wrote:
Wrist/armband never worked very accurately, and should not be used.
YES & NO
I started off with a chest strap and knew how to properly use it so had a good baseline and backlog of data. Then i got a new garmin watch and thought optimistically i would be able to use its wrist HR at least for my regular steady jogs, then switch to the more accurate chest strap for workout runs. WRONG, the Wrist was terrible for me, and i tried wearing it several different ways in hope of finding a sweet-spot, but nope.
The drawbacks on Chest strap(Garmin Dual/Premium) for me were:
- I'm skinny so it would creep/slide down when running sweaty track workouts in the summer which got to be real annoying.
- Having to wet the contacts was annoying. I have below average perspiration. Winter/cold usage was tricky
- Overall it was inconvenient and took away from my running enjoyment.
Then i got the PolarOH1 Arm Band.
I tested it thoroughly side-by-side with the chest strap for accuracy "DCRainmaker style" and it exceeded my expectations. It hit anything i threw at it; 200's 400's, tempo runs, time trials. Also tested on the bike outdoors doing 30sec max efforts and all good. Only difference i could detect was a ~2-5sec lag in HR ramp-up when initiating an effort which i was fine with. It is very convenient & comfortable. Much so that I utilize it all the time including races. I wear it above my bicep and have its tension set just right to be snug enough to make full contact. Winter performance is no diff. Its under my tight sleeve so theoretically that could increase performance for someone not wearing it snug enough since the sleeve helps to keep any outside light from reaching the sensor. There is a couple other arm-band variants from Scosche & Wahoo but i choose the Polar since it it the most simple/light/comfortable design that disappears on your arm.