This is the Biden thread. Post your TDS on the Trump thread.
I just posted on the Trump thread- you can debate me there. Thank you.
Lolz, just started catching up on today's posts.. clearly not a good day for the Trump lovers
Why not a good day for Trump? Just a continuation of his good luck. Mueller investigation - nothing there. 2 impeachments - 2 ACQUITTALS. So many other partisan investigations. Nothing. 98 indictments - ZERO convictions. 50 years conducting business in NYC - ZERO CONVICTIONS. He is as clean as they come. Stormy Daniels - hush money to a porn star. LOL. Just pathetic how low you guys sink to. He is batting 50-0. He is the Babe Ruth to Harry Colliflower (look that up). You guys are batting 0-200. Pathetic. Just pathetic.
Hey trumpers, whatever happened to Biden's impeachment or have you already moved on to anothed shiny object? Lolz, you were all very confident the Biden crime family was finally going to be exposed. Let me guess, just wait another 2 weeks?
Headlines yesterday. And we'd trade this for the criminal thug mob boss who cheats on every wife and is applauded for it by his people. Whose four years were miserable openly corrupt and divisive, ending in a coup attempt led by him.
‘Envy of the World’—U.S. Economy Expected to Keep Powering Higher Economists lift their growth forecasts in latest Wall Street Journal survey
Homicides Are Plummeting in American Cities
US Retail Sales Top Forecasts as Consumers Keep Fueling Growth
This sums up the trial and the politics pretty well. Although it leaves out the crime of falsely manipulating business records.
Aaron Blake @AaronBlake Only ~1/3 of Americans believe Trump did something illegal in the hush-money case. But when you take Trump out of it and ask about the substance of the charges -- whether it's a crime to "to pay someone to remain silent about an issue that may affect the outcome of an election" -- as many as 7 in 10 have said that's a crime.
This sums up the trial and the politics pretty well. Although it leaves out the crime of falsely manipulating business records.
Aaron Blake @AaronBlake Only ~1/3 of Americans believe Trump did something illegal in the hush-money case. But when you take Trump out of it and ask about the substance of the charges -- whether it's a crime to "to pay someone to remain silent about an issue that may affect the outcome of an election" -- as many as 7 in 10 have said that's a crime.
Well we’ve just got to see. this is a charge that has never been attempted on a US Citizen. She says nothing happened. interesting develop in the disease.
This sums up the trial and the politics pretty well. Although it leaves out the crime of falsely manipulating business records.
Aaron Blake @AaronBlake Only ~1/3 of Americans believe Trump did something illegal in the hush-money case. But when you take Trump out of it and ask about the substance of the charges -- whether it's a crime to "to pay someone to remain silent about an issue that may affect the outcome of an election" -- as many as 7 in 10 have said that's a crime.
Well we’ve just got to see. this is a charge that has never been attempted on a US Citizen. She says nothing happened. interesting develop in the disease.
Well we’ve just got to see. this is a charge that has never been attempted on a US Citizen. She says nothing happened. interesting develop in the disease.
liar. of course.
If you only knew what that word meant, lol. this disease has taken you to new depths. she 100% said it never happened and the flip from misdemeanor (expired) to this new charge is paving new ground. it’s just a development in the disease you have succumbed to. it’s fun as heck from the outside looking in. Free commercials for Trump
This sums up the trial and the politics pretty well. Although it leaves out the crime of falsely manipulating business records.
Aaron Blake @AaronBlake Only ~1/3 of Americans believe Trump did something illegal in the hush-money case. But when you take Trump out of it and ask about the substance of the charges -- whether it's a crime to "to pay someone to remain silent about an issue that may affect the outcome of an election" -- as many as 7 in 10 have said that's a crime.
"...that may affect the outcome of an election" - Trump is the only person capable of affecting the outcome of an election."
Well we’ve just got to see. this is a charge that has never been attempted on a US Citizen. She says nothing happened. interesting develop in the disease.
liar. of course.
You’re on a 9 year run thinking Trump has committed a crime. lol. Fun to watch
You’re on a 9 year run thinking Trump has committed a crime. lol. Fun to watch
Which, of course, libs will roll about 15 years of their lives invested into the bizarre notion that Trump has committed one crime after another, even creating new crimes to try out.
Trump has given you libs reason to live, which is incredible. You owe him greatly.
If you only knew what that word meant, lol. this disease has taken you to new depths. she 100% said it never happened and the flip from misdemeanor (expired) to this new charge is paving new ground. it’s just a development in the disease you have succumbed to. it’s fun as heck from the outside looking in. Free commercials for Trump
She first denied it and then now says it happened.
but the point is the payoff, coverup and financial crime, not whether or not they did the thing.
and anyway, you would believe that biden is a child molester and that trump is not a criminal, so whatever you think is just a mush of gorgonzola that has been left in the sun too long.
NPR:
Daniels said she had sex with Trump, despite not wanting to or being physically attracted to him, because she felt trapped once she went back to his hotel room alone. Daniels was 27 years old at the time, and Trump was 60.
PBS:
In the interview, Daniels described a sexual encounter with Trump that began with him talking about himself and showing her an issue of a magazine with his picture on the cover. She said she asked, “Does this … does this normally work for you?” He was taken aback, she says. “And I was like, ‘Someone should take that magazine and spank you with it.'” She says she then ordered him to drop his pants and, in a playful manner, “I just gave him a couple swats.” She said they talked some more, although he quit talking about himself, and that she became more comfortable. “He was like, ‘Wow, you — you are special. You remind me of my daughter.’ You know — he was like, ‘You’re smart and beautiful, and a woman to be reckoned with, and I like you. I like you.'” She said after dinner in Trump’s room, they had sex. He didn’t use a condom, she said, and she didn’t ask him to. Afterward, he asked to see her again, she said.
Washington CNN — Stormy Daniels was “truthful about having unprotected vaginal intercourse with Donald Trump in July 2006,” according to a polygraph test report from 2011.[ The report states that the “probability of deception was measured to be less than 1%.”
This post was edited 3 minutes after it was posted.
You’re on a 9 year run thinking Trump has committed a crime. lol. Fun to watch
Which, of course, libs will roll about 15 years of their lives invested into the bizarre notion that Trump has committed one crime after another, even creating new crimes to try out.
Trump has given you libs reason to live, which is incredible. You owe him greatly.
morans like this one are dumb enough to think trump hires criminals, works with criminals, gives raises to criminals, has had many of his circle go to jail, and praises criminals...but isn't one himself. They will openly ignore his obvious tax crimes, sedition crimes, financial crimes, document crimes...get this...they'll even say it's not a crime to pressure state workers into falsely changing vote totals.
gentlemen, I give you m'aga.
This post was edited 1 minute after it was posted.
If you only knew what that word meant, lol. this disease has taken you to new depths. she 100% said it never happened and the flip from misdemeanor (expired) to this new charge is paving new ground. it’s just a development in the disease you have succumbed to. it’s fun as heck from the outside looking in. Free commercials for Trump
She first denied it and then now says it happened.
but the point is the payoff, not whether or not they did the thing.
and anyway, you would believe that biden is a child molester and that trump is not a criminal, so whatever you think is just a mush of gorgonzola that has been left in the sun too long.
NPR:
Daniels said she had sex with Trump, despite not wanting to or being physically attracted to him, because she felt trapped once she went back to his hotel room alone. Daniels was 27 years old at the time, and Trump was 60.
PBS:
In the interview, Daniels described a sexual encounter with Trump that began with him talking about himself and showing her an issue of a magazine with his picture on the cover. She said she asked, “Does this … does this normally work for you?” He was taken aback, she says. “And I was like, ‘Someone should take that magazine and spank you with it.'” She says she then ordered him to drop his pants and, in a playful manner, “I just gave him a couple swats.” She said they talked some more, although he quit talking about himself, and that she became more comfortable. “He was like, ‘Wow, you — you are special. You remind me of my daughter.’ You know — he was like, ‘You’re smart and beautiful, and a woman to be reckoned with, and I like you. I like you.'” She said after dinner in Trump’s room, they had sex. He didn’t use a condom, she said, and she didn’t ask him to. Afterward, he asked to see her again, she said.
Washington CNN — Stormy Daniels was “truthful about having unprotected vaginal intercourse with Donald Trump in July 2006,” according to a polygraph test report from 2011.[ The report states that the “probability of deception was measured to be less than 1%.”
Agip - do you REALLY care about someone paying a porn star money to not go blabbing about the dalliance? Is it really important in the grand scheme of things or you only care because it is yet another attempt to keep Trump off the ballot?
She first denied it and then now says it happened.
but the point is the payoff, not whether or not they did the thing.
and anyway, you would believe that biden is a child molester and that trump is not a criminal, so whatever you think is just a mush of gorgonzola that has been left in the sun too long.
NPR:
Daniels said she had sex with Trump, despite not wanting to or being physically attracted to him, because she felt trapped once she went back to his hotel room alone. Daniels was 27 years old at the time, and Trump was 60.
PBS:
In the interview, Daniels described a sexual encounter with Trump that began with him talking about himself and showing her an issue of a magazine with his picture on the cover. She said she asked, “Does this … does this normally work for you?” He was taken aback, she says. “And I was like, ‘Someone should take that magazine and spank you with it.'” She says she then ordered him to drop his pants and, in a playful manner, “I just gave him a couple swats.” She said they talked some more, although he quit talking about himself, and that she became more comfortable. “He was like, ‘Wow, you — you are special. You remind me of my daughter.’ You know — he was like, ‘You’re smart and beautiful, and a woman to be reckoned with, and I like you. I like you.'” She said after dinner in Trump’s room, they had sex. He didn’t use a condom, she said, and she didn’t ask him to. Afterward, he asked to see her again, she said.
Washington CNN — Stormy Daniels was “truthful about having unprotected vaginal intercourse with Donald Trump in July 2006,” according to a polygraph test report from 2011.[ The report states that the “probability of deception was measured to be less than 1%.”
Agip - do you REALLY care about someone paying a porn star money to not go blabbing about the dalliance? Is it really important in the grand scheme of things or you only care because it is yet another attempt to keep Trump off the ballot?
this is a fair question. Thank you Sally.
I go a few ways here.
first off, we have campaign finance rules for a reason. Voters are entitled to know important information about candidates. That is why the laws are there
Second off, we have financial recording laws for a reason. You can't just write whatever yiou want into books. There are laws to keep the system working. If financial books were nonsense, then the financial system would freeze up because banks would not trust anyone.
Trump clearly broke both of these laws. Clearly. Indisputably. He hid the payments from voters and he cooked the books. Done. Laws broken.
HOWEVER, and this is personal...I think the 'hide the affair from the spouse' excuse is a strong one. You get a lot of leeway when hiding affairs from your family.
That said, we know trump did not hide his affairs and his family knew all about them for decades as he openly cheated on his family over and over.
So he only was trying to hide this from the Christian voters, not from his family.
So the 'hide from spouse' exemption isn't very powerful in this case.
the payoff WAS primarily to mislead voters, which makes the charge much more valid.
This post was edited 1 minute after it was posted.
This sums up the trial and the politics pretty well. Although it leaves out the crime of falsely manipulating business records.
Aaron Blake @AaronBlake Only ~1/3 of Americans believe Trump did something illegal in the hush-money case. But when you take Trump out of it and ask about the substance of the charges -- whether it's a crime to "to pay someone to remain silent about an issue that may affect the outcome of an election" -- as many as 7 in 10 have said that's a crime.
The actual crime here was extortion and the perpetrators were a porn star and a sleazy Democrat lawyer who's currently sitting in prison for stealing money from the client he tried to extort Trump with.
Daniels signed an NDA and violated that NDA because Trump was running for office and knew she could have a payday.
He paid the wh*re for the sex and he paid the wh*re for the NDA long before he entered politics.
No one with an IQ over 85 thinks this case has any merit whatsoever.
