ahem, no wrote:
Nope. Put your glasses. It was an intentional short kick. The Vandy team swarmed where they knew the kick was headed. She did not carry through with the leg kick like she kicks in a soccer game (goalie for the NCAA champ Vandy team). The kick went far enough for Vandy to try to recover it. If the ball bounces upward Vandy had a chance to get the ball and score some points (they ended up being shut out).
bryan evans wrote:
Are you..... Are you trying to say that was an onside kick? If so, it was theWORST onside kick in the history of kicks. Even worse than if she was actually trying to kick it deep.
Bryan, I hope you know more about track than you do about football. There is a huge difference in an onside kick and an intentional short kick. As "ahem, no" pointed out, in an intentional short kick, the kick is done so in a manner that gives the kicking team a decent chance to recover the ball, while still kicking the ball further down the field than one would in a "traditional" onside kick.
Yes, much like an onside kick you're hoping for a weird bounce or bad handle of the ball by the receiving team, BUT you're guaranteeing that the receiving team starts deeper in their own side of the field if they properly receive the ball. The reason is that by the time they get the ball, the coverage from the kicking team is usually right on top of them, either forcing a fair catch, an immediate drop down to a knee or they are tackled almost instantly. If you do a traditional onside kick and you (the kicking team) don't recover, the opponent (the receiving team) has the ball 30 yards or so further up the field than in this intentional short kick and their chances for scoring either a touchdown or FG go way up.