Sir Mo falls short of British Record while Tommy Hughes strikes again with a 71:09 age 60+ WR!

dude, please wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

Speaking of no argument - you have nothing that can explain Hughes' outlier performances other than that he is fast because he is clean. That isn't an argument - it is a conclusion that begs its premise. I dont expect a gladiator like you to understand that.

You need to get out more.

Like you? So why are you here?

Armstronglivs wrote:

dude, please wrote:

You need to get out more.

Like you? So why are you here?

Yes, like me, I'm almost 58 years old and I'm exactly the same height as I was when I was 22.

My cardiovascular system is doing just fine up to now.

If Tommy is ageing as well as me...?

Now get off the board and do something physical, because your body and mind are not something you should waste.

Armstronglivs wrote:

Dope Hardstrong wrote:

Nope. Every performance is "impossible" until someone does it. Remember the 4 minute mile? I think you do.

This Gladiator gets it.

Still, various iterations of 'ur dumb" are not evidence.

Be better.

Better is out of your reach.

Your "impossible" feat argument is no argument. 9.79 for the 100m was "impossible" till Ben Johnson ran it. Then he tested positive. Lance Armstrong's 7 yellow jerseys was also "impossible". Anything that is "impossible" is just as likely to be the result of doping. If it looks too good to be true it probably is.

Your own standards have no bearing on any of this. If Hughes is in the arena, you are still in a playpen.

I get better every day.

Try it.

I would crush Hughes in my arena. Horses for courses

Some horses never leave the stable. That would be you know who.

Be better, and not just at constructing strawmen.

I think it's impossible for you to stop your habit though.

tis a life thou shouldst get wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

Like you? So why are you here?

Yes, like me, I'm almost 58 years old and I'm exactly the same height as I was when I was 22.

My cardiovascular system is doing just fine up to now.

If Tommy is ageing as well as me...?

Now get off the board and do something physical, because your body and mind are not something you should waste.

So you are 5'2"?

Somehow I feel if I did what you do then that would be as big a waste of my time as I could imagine.

Dope Hardstrong wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

Better is out of your reach.

Your "impossible" feat argument is no argument. 9.79 for the 100m was "impossible" till Ben Johnson ran it. Then he tested positive. Lance Armstrong's 7 yellow jerseys was also "impossible". Anything that is "impossible" is just as likely to be the result of doping. If it looks too good to be true it probably is.

Your own standards have no bearing on any of this. If Hughes is in the arena, you are still in a playpen.

I get better every day.

Try it.

I would crush Hughes in my arena. Horses for courses

Some horses never leave the stable. That would be you know who.

Be better, and not just at constructing strawmen.

I think it's impossible for you to stop your habit though.

Speaking of horses, I think you would be very familiar with what comes out their rear end. You're full of it.

Dope Hardstrong wrote:

I would crush Hughes in my arena.

That's fighting talk. What arena is that and how old are you?

Armstronglivs wrote:

So you are 5'2"?

Somehow I feel if I did what you do then that would be as big a waste of my time as I could imagine.

So do you work here then? How's the pay? Paid leave?

Is trolling 12 hours a day here, every day really the life you want?

And btw I'm exactly 1.90m tall. All of your claims about rate of decline are exaggerated

What really frustrates you is that Tommy looks even older than you. That's the truth isn't it?

Armstronglivs wrote:

Dope Hardstrong wrote:

I get better every day.

Try it.

I would crush Hughes in my arena. Horses for courses

Some horses never leave the stable. That would be you know who.

Be better, and not just at constructing strawmen.

I think it's impossible for you to stop your habit though.

Speaking of horses, I think you would be very familiar with what comes out their rear end. You're full of it.

Yes, I was a horse trainer.

Keep up the ad hominem and strawman work. It's all you have left.

Dope Hardstrong wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

Speaking of horses, I think you would be very familiar with what comes out their rear end. You're full of it.

Yes, I was a horse trainer.

Keep up the ad hominem and strawman work. It's all you have left.

You never had anything else.

But I'm sure you can sweep stables.

tis a life thou shouldst get wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

So you are 5'2"?

Somehow I feel if I did what you do then that would be as big a waste of my time as I could imagine.

So do you work here then? How's the pay? Paid leave?

Is trolling 12 hours a day here, every day really the life you want?

And btw I'm exactly 1.90m tall. All of your claims about rate of decline are exaggerated

What really frustrates you is that Tommy looks even older than you. That's the truth isn't it?

1.90m tall. You sounded so much like you have a small man's complex. It's a shame that intelligence isn't measured in centimeters.

I was going to suggest that the award for dumbest poster should go to Dope Hardstrong. I've changed my mind. With you we have a winner.

Armstronglivs wrote:

Dope Hardstrong wrote:

Yes, I was a horse trainer.

Keep up the ad hominem and strawman work. It's all you have left.

You never had anything else.

But I'm sure you can sweep stables.

Except performance in the arena.

Yes, I am an excellent sweeper. I excel at everything I put effort into.

Dope Hardstrong wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

You never had anything else.

But I'm sure you can sweep stables.

Except performance in the arena.

Yes, I am an excellent sweeper. I excel at everything I put effort into.

I'm sure you are a good sweeper. Even humble tasks can be done well. And you have so much to be humble about.

Armstronglivs wrote:

I'm sure you are a good sweeper. Even humble tasks can be done well. And you have so much to be humble about.

Correct. The list is endless.

Dope Hardstrong wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

I'm sure you are a good sweeper. Even humble tasks can be done well. And you have so much to be humble about.

Correct. The list is endless.

Irony - the feature of a sophisticated intellect - is not part of your tool-kit. And neither is humility, apparently.

You just went on about "humble". That's humility.

Isn't it ironic?

"I think ur dumb therefore Tommy is doping" repeated for 100 posts is not exactly the intelligent argument you are supposing.

Dope Hardstrong wrote:

You just went on about "humble". That's humility.

Isn't it ironic?

"I think ur dumb therefore Tommy is doping" repeated for 100 posts is not exactly the intelligent argument you are supposing.

That really shows how dumb you are, that you think that is the argument.

I gave reasons for why I find Hughes' performances dubious.

That you are as thick as a bunch of planks is an entirely independent argument. What makes it easy is that you provide the proof. Again and again.

Armstronglivs wrote:

Dope Hardstrong wrote:

You just went on about "humble". That's humility.

Isn't it ironic?

"I think ur dumb therefore Tommy is doping" repeated for 100 posts is not exactly the intelligent argument you are supposing.

That really shows how dumb you are, that you think that is the argument.

I gave reasons for why I find Hughes' performances dubious.

That you are as thick as a bunch of planks is an entirely independent argument. What makes it easy is that you provide the proof. Again and again.

The "reason" being that you are weak therefore Tommy should be too.

Get some grit.

Besides all your arguments on here degenerate to "ur dumb". Time to grow up a little gramps.

I bet you won't and you'll show it again and again and again.

Dope Hardstrong wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

That really shows how dumb you are, that you think that is the argument.

I gave reasons for why I find Hughes' performances dubious.

That you are as thick as a bunch of planks is an entirely independent argument. What makes it easy is that you provide the proof. Again and again.

The "reason" being that you are weak therefore Tommy should be too.

Get some grit.

Besides all your arguments on here degenerate to "ur dumb". Time to grow up a little gramps.

I bet you won't and you'll show it again and again and again.

You keep proving my argument about your stupidity by failing to understand my argument about Hughes. I'm even feeling a little sorry for you. Not only are you a dullard out of his depth in a discussion, you are also nowhere near being Hughes' level as an athlete; you lose on both counts.

Armstronglivs wrote:

You keep proving my argument about your stupidity by failing to understand my argument about Hughes. I'm even feeling a little sorry for you. Not only are you a dullard out of his depth in a discussion, you are also nowhere near being Hughes' level as an athlete; you lose on both counts.

Nope. I fully understand it, I just don't believe you are right. That's what grinds your gears.

EVERY discussion you are involved in one here involves you getting all riled because people don't share your opinion.

Tennis, Track, Ageing, US politics, Racism, Boxing etc. You're the only one on Earth who understands these things according to you.

Look at your response to the 58 year old above and tell me you're normal. It's a disorder of some sort. Get help. I think you maybe have some sort of pugilistic dementia from your boxing "career".

Were you like this in everyday life before you had the internet to vent on?