It is simple enough to have each submit its runners and order an hour before the race. Then once they are all in they are made public.
It is simple enough to have each submit its runners and order an hour before the race. Then once they are all in they are made public.
John Wesley Harding wrote:
YARLY wrote:
2.5 miles isn't a joke distance. I've long felt that having 5k xc be the distance in high school, and moving up to 8k in college prohibited speed types from competing. The advantage is still to the person with more endurance but it makes things interesting.
Who’s talking about 2.5 miles? 2.5km = ~1.55 miles. And it’s not so much the distance (or lack thereof) that makes it a joke as the fact that nobody races 2.5k, there’s no historical precedent and so it’s tougher to judge the strength of the performance. If someone tells me they’ve run an impressive time for 2.5 K, I’m gonna narrow my eyes and think “run a real distance and get back to me.”
I think a 4x5K makes a lot of sense. Even non-runners are familiar enough with a 5K to get a sense of it.
Tribe wrote:
I disagree with this. I tune in to watch the cross country skiing relays every olympics. They’re super exciting. I’ve even started watching them on you tube. I’ve never cross country ski’d in my life.
Dr Yuengling wrote:
The argument that this will somehow be more attractive to the "casual fan" is ridiculous. The average person isn't going to give a sh!t about cross country whether it's a relay or a 10k. They might watch it if it happens to be on, the same way that I occasionally watch curling if it comes on right after a popular event. Nobody is tuning in specifically to watch cross country except hardcore running fans- a group that almost 100% prefers a regular 10k race.
Not sure you still qualify as a "casual fan" to be honest.
Hoka One One Napali wrote:
So can we just add a mountainous 100 mile trail race too? That would be far better because it would be a far better story for non-runners than “fast dudes run for 30 minutes on grass”. I’m serious.
The 100 mile race is just stupid. It should be a 16 day endurance race. When the torch is lit the race starts and then the closing cermonies mark the end. What could be more exciting than watching a bunch of slugs walk around for 16 days?
Luv2Run wrote:
John Wesley Harding wrote:
Who’s talking about 2.5 miles? 2.5km = ~1.55 miles. And it’s not so much the distance (or lack thereof) that makes it a joke as the fact that nobody races 2.5k, there’s no historical precedent and so it’s tougher to judge the strength of the performance. If someone tells me they’ve run an impressive time for 2.5 K, I’m gonna narrow my eyes and think “run a real distance and get back to me.”
I think a 4x5K makes a lot of sense. Even non-runners are familiar enough with a 5K to get a sense of it.
You are doubling the time of the event and taking something that could be done in 25 minutes (which would already be a stretch) to making it last for an hour? If you have any rationale of trying to attract casual fans that is not the way to do it.
People always like to say that XC is not about times so why does it matter that they are racing a 5k. The course will always be different depending on what country is hosting so make it a arbitrary distance like 2.5k. Casual fans can relate it to being half of a 5k but they likely won't care.
dadsfadsfdasfdsafdas wrote:
Hoka One One Napali wrote:
So can we just add a mountainous 100 mile trail race too? That would be far better because it would be a far better story for non-runners than “fast dudes run for 30 minutes on grass”. I’m serious.
The 100 mile race is just stupid. It should be a 16 day endurance race. When the torch is lit the race starts and then the closing cermonies mark the end. What could be more exciting than watching a bunch of slugs walk around for 16 days?
You may be on to something here. However, I think it should be a race of a distance that’s bound to take the winners 10-12 days to complete. It would start on day two or three, allowing time after the opening ceremonies for the athletes to be flown about 1,000 miles away from the host city to the start-site of their race, and then get stretched out.
For Tokyo, athletes could start in Fukuoka and run north for nearly the length of mainland Japan, passing through several major cities before doubling back south to finish in Tokyo.
For Paris, athletes could run from Warsaw or Minsk back to Paris.
For L.A., athletes could run from Denver/Boulder back to L.A. via SLC & Vegas or Albuquerque & Phoenix.
Make the coverage as basic and inexpensive as possible, but constantly available should someone care to check in. Various storylines are bound to develop, and I think the slow-burning and borderline sadistic nature of the event could draw a cult following.
I’m a D2 female runner. Our coach explicitly told us not to visit LetsRun forums.
Great interview with Steve Cram - says Jakob has no chance of WRs this year
RENATO can you talk about the preparation of Emile Cairess 2:06
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion
adizero Road to Records with Yomif Kejelcha, Agnes Ngetich, Hobbs Kessler & many more is Saturday
Hats off to my dad. He just ran a 1:42 Half Marathon and turns 75 in 2 months!