Soon with wavelight. O-/U- 3 years? For me, under.
JAKOB MF INGEBRIGTSEN NEW WORLD RECORD!!!!! 7:54.11
Pro News/Info/Results
-
10
-
Ooops. Re: 12:29 5k
10 -
The observing northman wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
But very little about doping. He prefers not to think about it.
If doping is all you think about, like it seems, why do you bother follow this sport? Maybe badminton is more your thing? Or backgammon?
If there are Kenyans in badminton or backgammon there will be cheating and doping I'm afraid.
32 -
Armstronglivs wrote:
The observing northman wrote:
You didn’t answer my question. Why do you bother? What do you get out of this sport, if every athlet doing good is a doper?
You miss the point. I don't "get anything out of the sport". I think it is a farce, like most professional sport now. It is all been changed by doping. I don't care about the results but I certainly know what I'm seeing - just like a lot of other cr*p going on in the world. To not see it is to remain a Pollyannish dreamer.
"It has all been changed by doping"? So you think the sport was "clean" 20-30 years ago? Who is the dreamer here?
21 -
Can the brojos please add another important feature?
Automatic downvote added for Armstrong and Coevett everytime someone reads the thread? Would save us a lot of unnecessary voting.
They have clearly given us their view on doping, can we discourage them trolling on every thread please.
103 -
I am Sam wrote:
Can the brojos please add another important feature?
Automatic downvote added for Armstrong and Coevett everytime someone reads the thread? Would save us a lot of unnecessary voting.
They have clearly given us their view on doping, can we discourage them trolling on every thread please.
They spend so much time here, endorsing various drugs, it makes me wonder if they are getting paid enough by their sponsors?
21 -
THOUGHTSLEADER wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
You miss the point. I don't "get anything out of the sport". I think it is a farce, like most professional sport now. It is all been changed by doping. I don't care about the results but I certainly know what I'm seeing - just like a lot of other cr*p going on in the world. To not see it is to remain a Pollyannish dreamer.
So you basically hate-watch?
I watch with my eyes open. You?
22 -
The observing northman wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
You miss the point. I don't "get anything out of the sport". I think it is a farce, like most professional sport now. It is all been changed by doping. I don't care about the results but I certainly know what I'm seeing - just like a lot of other cr*p going on in the world. To not see it is to remain a Pollyannish dreamer.
"It has all been changed by doping"? So you think the sport was "clean" 20-30 years ago? Who is the dreamer here?
I didn't say that. I have never said it. A purely fanciful assumption on your part. Doping has increasingly become a feature in the sport for over half a century. It has become more and more sophisticated and remains ahead of antidoping. It is in every sport, and some more than others and some countries more than others. But it is certainly at the top. That's how you get to the top.
21 -
I am Sam wrote:
Can the brojos please add another important feature?
Automatic downvote added for Armstrong and Coevett everytime someone reads the thread? Would save us a lot of unnecessary voting.
They have clearly given us their view on doping, can we discourage them trolling on every thread please.
What are you doing to discourage doping? Oh, right - you don't want to talk about that.
11 -
Doping Endorsers Out wrote:
I am Sam wrote:
Can the brojos please add another important feature?
Automatic downvote added for Armstrong and Coevett everytime someone reads the thread? Would save us a lot of unnecessary voting.
They have clearly given us their view on doping, can we discourage them trolling on every thread please.
They spend so much time here, endorsing various drugs, it makes me wonder if they are getting paid enough by their sponsors?
Dopers don't need any endorsement. They do it because they get results. My view is to call out doping - not endorse it.
This post was edited 25 seconds after it was posted.21 -
Armstronglivs wrote:
Doping Endorsers Out wrote:
They spend so much time here, endorsing various drugs, it makes me wonder if they are getting paid enough by their sponsors?
Dopers don't need any endorsement. They do it because they get results. My view is to call out doping - not endorse it.
You're delusional.
13 -
The observing northman wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
There will be doping in those sports, too. But you prefer to hold on to your dreams in which your heroes don't know anything about doping.
You didn’t answer my question. Why do you bother? What do you get out of this sport, if every athlet doing good is a doper?
If asked some concrete question, he usually changes the subject, calls you some bad names, runs away. You will not get a serious answer.
41 -
Phil Ken Sebben wrote:
Soon with wavelight. O-/U- 3 years? For me, under.
It's you that were claiming that Katir will be caught in weeks in 2021.
Ma memory always stick on something important.
00 -
I am Sam wrote:
Can the brojos please add another important feature?
Automatic downvote added for Armstrong and Coevett everytime someone reads the thread? Would save us a lot of unnecessary voting.
They have clearly given us their view on doping, can we discourage them trolling on every thread please.
Only Coevett. I actually 👏 Armstronglivs [ though I don't agree with him] because he is at least being consistent by strongly accusing Jakob of doping. That's all I really wanted from him, consistency and lack of clear bias. He is demonstrating that.
Coevett OTOH......moron. he thinks PEDs are powerful cheat tools, that all the best Africans use them, but then this pure, pale Aryan white kid comes along and destroys them all, and mauls one of the most cherished "PED-enhanced" [ supposedly] records, and yet he's completely clean! Amazing!
The white westerner can destroy alllllll the dirty doped to the gills Africans. If they didn't all cheat he'd be lapping them with ease!
Talk about delusional bias.
41 -
81234567 wrote:
The observing northman wrote:
You didn’t answer my question. Why do you bother? What do you get out of this sport, if every athlet doing good is a doper?
If asked some concrete question, he usually changes the subject, calls you some bad names, runs away. You will not get a serious answer.
Liar soorer back again - under his 4000th handle. Nothing you say is worth discussing.
02 -
Doping Endorsers Out wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
Dopers don't need any endorsement. They do it because they get results. My view is to call out doping - not endorse it.
You're delusional.
Then apparently so are countless coaches, trainers, physicians and athletes, all involved in doping.
31 -
That's true.
I don't usually agree with you.
30 -
Armstronglivs wrote:
Doping Endorsers Out wrote:
You're delusional.
Then apparently so are countless coaches, trainers, physicians and athletes, all involved in doping.
You ruin every thread you enter. The contribution is 0. Its so boring to talk about. Please stop. Lets talk about track and field.
51 -
Armstronglivs wrote:
81234567 wrote:
If asked some concrete question, he usually changes the subject, calls you some bad names, runs away. You will not get a serious answer.
Liar soorer back again - under his 4000th handle. Nothing you say is worth discussing.
Yes, I stated a fact: if you are asked some concrete question, you usually change the subject, run away, call the questioner some bad names. No need to discuss it anymore.
21 -
LarsL11 wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
Then apparently so are countless coaches, trainers, physicians and athletes, all involved in doping.
You ruin every thread you enter. The contribution is 0. Its so boring to talk about. Please stop. Lets talk about track and field.
That's like talking about body-building without drugs. That's how WADA sess T and F.
01
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.