Video Highlights 2015 Boston Marathon
April 20, 2015
iiagdtr wrote:
Nailed it.
If we need a voice-over for his Ironman vid I can do a passable Donald Duck imitation. Naturally Disco Duck will be the theme song.
ExpertKipWatcher wrote:I think he'd take to the swim stage like a Duck to water
unfortunately a deal has been signed with a certain entertainment/event company from philly for all of the coverage.
Mike will do the VO himself, naturally.
I think that calls for The Friday Rossi. Hold onto your...selves.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzhW4YAVqxo
somebloke wrote:
iiagdtr wrote:Nailed it.
If we need a voice-over for his Ironman vid I can do a passable Donald Duck imitation. Naturally Disco Duck will be the theme song.
unfortunately a deal has been signed with a certain entertainment/event company from philly for all of the coverage.
Mike will do the VO himself, naturally.
When I thought Mike couldn't sink any lower:
https://mobile.twitter.com/mikerossi22/status/657371527327948800
Apparently he's coming to SC to commit assault rather than train to win $100k. Of course he deleted that clear threat. Now there's one sharp cookie.
Loofa Dog wrote:
When I thought Mike couldn't sink any lower:
https://mobile.twitter.com/mikerossi22/status/657371527327948800
Loofa Dog wrote:
When I thought Mike couldn't sink any lower:
https://mobile.twitter.com/mikerossi22/status/657371527327948800
I don't get it. What's the answer? Him? Is he saying he's injured but running while he's in SC?
elephino wrote:
Loofa Dog wrote:When I thought Mike couldn't sink any lower:
https://mobile.twitter.com/mikerossi22/status/657371527327948800I don't get it. What's the answer? Him? Is he saying he's injured but running while he's in SC?
I am lost too. the one leg reference is?!
iiagdtr wrote:
Apparently he's coming to SC to commit assault rather than train to win $100k. Of course he deleted that clear threat. Now there's one sharp cookie.
Loofa Dog wrote:When I thought Mike couldn't sink any lower:
https://mobile.twitter.com/mikerossi22/status/657371527327948800
OK. My cookie sharpness order (from least to most) for those DIRECTLY involved (no Ken)
1. Barb McKeever - she makes money of race directing. Yet she is too incompetent to see a cheater.
2. Bart Yasso - self professed lover of the sport.... until a decision is too tough.
3. Mike Rossi - Yes. A cheater. But I would guess that he is one of those liars where everyone says "Oh, that's so Mike" - but it is a true sickness.
Has anyone seen his hideous new shoes he posted about on Facebook? He and one of his adoring fans are yukking it up about buying a pair for the person who he gives his bibs too. How long until he realized he is the joke.
finisher medal wrote:
SmartRunnr wrote:Pics, or it didn't happen, Ken!
PICS OR IT DIDN'T HAPPEN?
TELL THAT TO MIKE ROSSI AND HIS MAGIC DISAPPEARING ACT!
Plus why are you posting from Ken's house? I thought you were joking when you said they pass you around.
Please stop bringing Ken into this.
Look me up on twitter and you'll see. But let's keep the focus on topic on Cheater Mike.
somebloke wrote:
elephino wrote:I don't get it. What's the answer? Him? Is he saying he's injured but running while he's in SC?
I am lost too. the one leg reference is?!
The saddest thing about all of this is that non-cheating Mike Rossi is still faster than me :(
iiagdtr wrote:
Look me up on twitter and you'll see. But let's keep the focus on topic on Cheater Mike.
somebloke wrote:I am lost too. the one leg reference is?!
I did.
That is the lowest we have ever seen from this cheater.
And you know what? I think he will go even lower once he starts reading what has transpired today. He'll pull out his homewrecker-hater cards for sure.
[/quote]
I did.
That is the lowest we have ever seen from this cheater.[/quote]
elephino wrote:
You're right. "Just one of the 20+ runners I sometimes meet for a jog" is way different from "barely knew him and only did an occasional long run with him in a group".
Yes, thank you. One needs to have at least a rudimentary understanding of running (groups) to appreciate the differences between joining a track workout with runner A and "only" going for "an occasional long run" with a group that coincidentally include runner A.
elephino wrote:You said a guy in a black shirt in the middle of the race was Rossi. Rossi was photographed in a gray shirt at the start and finish. Therefore, you are saying he changed shirts.
Logical fallacy. You are mixing your personal (troll?) opinion (1) with my correct statement (2) in order to pretend that I made a nonsense claim.
(1) being that there was a black (not dark gray) shirt in photo X, and (2) being that Rossi is in photo X, thusly "concluding" that I "claimed" that Rossi changed shirts from a dark gray one to a black one. But alas, I did not.
Read my statement again. Or, try to understand this: Rossi did not change shirts during his 3:11 marathon, and I never said he did.
elephino wrote:
Mike himself has backed off claiming those photos were of him.
Where, when? Did you make that one up too, or "concluded" that from a tweet where he didn't even mention photos?
Last, the photos were not "debunked"; they were just challenged by some basement trolls. Just trust the official lengthy and thorough investigation of experts with direct access to all the evidence.
finisher medal wrote:
$10K for 20 minutes work? I wish.
What kind of retard can't repeat a time he already ran for $100,000? He has a whole year!.
You are right on with the $10,000.
Show a bit more patience, there's still lots of time (until July 2016?), and Rossi already re-injured himself because of his type A personality.
As already discussed, in the end Rojo might have to pay $121,000, if I understand the challenge correctly: $10,000 for sub-20 or sub-70, and $10,000 for sub-3:25, and $100,000 for 3:11 or under, and $500 for his phone's data, and $500 for the photos.
However, considering his current injury, he really only has one shot left for the big prize, namely in the coming spring. So while success is quite likely, it is far from guaranteed. The remaining $21,000 of course are way too easy to earn for a 3:11 marathoni.
SmartRunnr wrote:
Show a bit more patience, there's still lots of time (until July 2016?), and Rossi already re-injured himself because of his type A personality.
Just wanted to say a sincere thank you. You're the best!
elephino wrote:
SmartRunnr wrote:Stop making stuff up.
RE: Bart Yasso enables cheater Mike Rossi 10/16/2015 10:30AM - in reply to Multivitamin
SmartRunnr
registered
Reply Return to Index Report Post
Multivitamin wrote:
If you two are such close budsWe are not. I never said we are. You fell for the troll(s) a la Trollminator/bored troller/trollthisandthat/finisher medal/LMR who constantly talk about sex with Mike. Well, just let them dream.
Mike is just one of the 20+ runners I sometimes meet for a jog.
Read more:
http://www.letsrun.com/forum/flat_read.php?thread=6479539&page=733#ixzz3pOHp2jik
You barely know the man, and yet he is your "clever hero." This sounds like an extremely one-sided relationship. You worship him, and he doesn't even know you exist. If you keep these feelings bottled up inside and keep admiring him from a distance, always afraid to approach him, they'll eat you up from the inside out. Yes, rejection is painful. It's like your heart has been run over, as a squirrel attempting to cross the I-78 might be by a giant pickup truck. But if you don't attempt to cross that highway, you'll be that squirrel staring at the other side of I-78, thinking, "I wonder if there are bigger nuts on the other side?"
Don't be that squirrel, Smarty.
If you skip all the Timing Mats of Opportunity, you get DQ'd from Love, man.
SmartRunnr wrote:
Well, who wants to get annoyed by basement trolls all the time? Just have a look how often and rude I get insulted here just because I sometimes remind people that the committee found no evidence of any wrongdoing by Rossi.
Furthermore Yasso knows not thinks that the 3:11 is legit, because he has seen all the evidence - without bias - in contrast to the trolls and to both of you who seriously still don't believe it.
And the committee also has found no evidence proving that George Washington never watched television.
But just as scientists know it's phsyically impossible for Washington to have watched television, excercise physiologists and running coaches like myself know it's physically impossible for Rossi to have run 3:11.
iiagdtr wrote:
I am certain had he cheated better and run 2:11:45 many of those same people would still believe him. They have near zero knowledge of the sport and give him props for the Madam Principal letter.
Great post. I never thought we'd be seeing a brilliant point I'd never thought of on post #14,800. Rossi's time might as well have been 2:11:45 and it wouldn't change anything. Those who don't understand running would still think it's possible he had the race of his life and those of us who understand running would be pulling our hair out trying to tell them it's not possible.
rojo wrote:
Rossi's time might as well have been 2:11:45 and it wouldn't change anything.
I don't agree. 2:11 is very hard and rare, as everyone can see, but 3:11? Over 1500 ran that time in one race in Chicago just a few weeks ago, but only 7 got a 2:11 or under, none of them being above 40.
3:11 "physically impossible" for a healthy guy who isn't even 50 yet? Don't make me laugh. Also, actions speak louder than words.